Use of Self-Monitoring to Maintain Program Fidelity of Multi-Tiered Interventions

Multi-tiered system of supports represents one of the most significant advancements in improving the outcomes of students for whom typical instruction is not effective. While many practices need to be in place to make multi-tiered systems of support effective, accurate implementation of evidence-based practices by individuals at all tiers is critical to obtain student outcomes. Effective strategies to achieve program fidelity are available; however, maintaining program fidelity at the individual level remains elusive. Lessons drawn from medicine indicate strategies to maintain program fidelity should address the implementer. Medical practitioners have used self-monitoring checklists to maintain fidelity with striking results. Research evaluating strategies to maintain program fidelity at the individual level represents an important next step in the field of education. Recommendations for a systematic research agenda focused on self-monitoring checklists are presented.

[1]  F. Gresham Responsiveness to intervention: an alternative approach to the identification of learning disabilities. , 2002 .

[2]  Karen A. Blase,et al.  Implementation research: A synthesis of the literature (No. 231). University of South Florida, Louis de la Parte Florida Mental Health Implementation Research Network. , 2012 .

[3]  K. Gansle,et al.  Assuring the Form Has Substance , 2006 .

[4]  M. Wolf,et al.  Good behavior game: effects of individual contingencies for group consequences on disruptive behavior in a classroom. , 1969, Journal of applied behavior analysis.

[5]  J. Durlak,et al.  Implementation Matters: A Review of Research on the Influence of Implementation on Program Outcomes and the Factors Affecting Implementation , 2008, American journal of community psychology.

[6]  A. Bandura Social cognitive theory of self-regulation☆ , 1991 .

[7]  C. Hollinger,et al.  Fidelity of Problem-Solving Implementation and Relationship to Student Performance , 2000 .

[8]  Robin S. Codding,et al.  Using performance feedback to improve treatment integrity of classwide behavior plans: an investigation of observer reactivity. , 2008, Journal of applied behavior analysis.

[9]  Mathea Falco,et al.  A review of research on fidelity of implementation: implications for drug abuse prevention in school settings. , 2003, Health education research.

[10]  A. Odden,et al.  Inside the Black Box of School District Spending on Professional Development: Lessons from Comparing Five Urban Districts , 2004 .

[11]  Ava E. Kleinmann,et al.  A comparison of performance feedback procedures on teachers' treatment implementation integrity and students' inappropriate behavior in special education classrooms. , 2007, Journal of applied behavior analysis.

[12]  John M Ellison,et al.  Assessing glucose monitor performance--a standardized approach. , 2007, Diabetes technology & therapeutics.

[13]  P. Friman,et al.  The Effects of Observational Feedback on Treatment Integrity in School-Based Behavioral Consultation. , 1997 .

[14]  H. Adelman,et al.  Systemic Change for School Improvement , 2007 .

[15]  M. Gulliford,et al.  Self‐monitoring in Type 2 diabetes mellitus: a meta‐analysis , 2000, Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association.

[16]  Deborah Bybee,et al.  Fidelity Criteria: Development, Measurement, and Validation , 2003 .

[17]  D. Gottfredson,et al.  Managing Adolescent Behavior A Multiyear, Multischool Study , 1993 .

[18]  E. Fox,et al.  Metacognition and Self-Regulation in James, Piaget, and Vygotsky , 2008 .

[19]  Louis Danielson,et al.  Identification of learning disabilities : research to practice , 2002 .

[20]  Karen A. Blase,et al.  Implementation Research: A Synthesis of the , 2005 .

[21]  E. Zamir,et al.  Intraocular lens confusions: a preventable "never event" - The Royal Victorian Eye and Ear Hospital protocol. , 2012, Survey of ophthalmology.

[22]  K. Stowman World health statistics. , 1949, The Milbank Memorial Fund quarterly.

[23]  J. Witt,et al.  TEACHER USE OF INTERVENTIONS IN GENERAL EDUCATION SETTINGS: MEASUREMENT AND ANALYSIS OF THE INDEPENDENT VARIABLE , 1997 .

[24]  T. Kratochwill Theories of Change and Adoption of Innovations: The Evolving Evidence-Based Intervention and Practic , 2005 .

[25]  Alicia M. Alvero,et al.  An Objective Review of the Effectiveness and Essential Characteristics of Performance Feedback in Organizational Settings (1985-1998) , 2001 .

[26]  S. Sheridan,et al.  Is Consultation Effective? , 1996 .

[27]  J. Luiselli,et al.  Effects of Verbal and Graphic Performance Feedback on Behavior Support Plan Implementation in a Public Elementary School , 2007, Behavior modification.

[28]  Thomas R. Kratochwill,et al.  Toward Developing a Science of Treatment Integrity: Introduction to the Special Series. , 2009 .

[29]  D. Gilbertson,et al.  Increasing teacher intervention implementation in general education settings through consultation and performance feedback. , 1997 .

[30]  W. Berry,et al.  A Surgical Safety Checklist to Reduce Morbidity and Mortality in a Global Population , 2009, The New England journal of medicine.

[31]  James K. McAfee,et al.  Providing Performance Feedback to Teachers: A Review , 2004 .

[32]  L. Burgio,et al.  Teaching and maintaining behavior management skills with nursing assistants in a nursing home. , 1998, The Gerontologist.

[33]  A. Long,et al.  Applying adult behavior change theory to support mediator-based intervention implementation. , 2013, School psychology quarterly : the official journal of the Division of School Psychology, American Psychological Association.