An improved process‐based representation of stream solute transport in the soil and water assessment tools

Hydrological models have long been used to study the interactions between land, surface and groundwater systems, and to predict and manage water quantity and quality. The soil and water assessment tool (SWAT), a widely used hydrological model, can simulate various ecohydrological processes on land and subsequently route the water quality constituents through surface and subsurface waters. So far, in‐stream solute transport algorithms of the SWAT model have only been minimally revised, even though it has been acknowledged that an improvement of in‐stream process representation can contribute to better model performance with respect to water quality. In this study, we aim to incorporate a new and improved solute transport model into the SWAT model framework. The new process‐based model was developed using in‐stream process equations from two well established models—the One‐dimensional Transport with Inflow and Storage model and the Enhanced Stream Water Quality Model. The modified SWAT model (Mir‐SWAT) was tested for water quality predictions in a study watershed in Germany. Compared to the standard SWAT model, Mir‐SWAT improved dissolved oxygen (DO) predictions by removing extreme low values of DO (<6 mg/L) simulated by SWAT. Phosphate concentration peaks were reduced during high flows and a better match of daily predicted and measured values was attained using the Mir‐SWAT model (R2 = 0.17, NSE = −0.65, RSR = 1.29 with SWAT; R2 = 0.28, NSE = −0.04, RSR = 1.02 with Mir‐SWAT). In addition, Mir‐SWAT performed better than the SWAT model in terms of Chlorophyll‐a content particularly during winter months, improving the NSE and RSR for monthly average Chl‐a by 74 and 42%, respectively. With the new model improvements, we aim to increase confidence in the stream solute transport component of the model, improve the understanding of nutrient dynamics in the stream, and to extend the applicability of SWAT for reach‐scale analysis and management.

[1]  N. Fohrer,et al.  Identifying the most important spatially distributed variables for explaining land use patterns in a rural lowland catchment in Germany , 2019, Journal of Geographical Sciences.

[2]  P. V. Femeena,et al.  Simple regression models can act as calibration-substitute to approximate transient storage parameters in streams , 2019, Advances in Water Resources.

[3]  N. Fohrer,et al.  Characterisation of the water and nutrient balance in the small rural lowland catchment of the Kielstau , 2018 .

[4]  Joseph S. Shapiro,et al.  Consequences of the Clean Water Act and the Demand for Water Quality , 2017, The Quarterly Journal of Economics.

[5]  Xiaodong Zhang,et al.  Modeling Water Quantity and Sulfate Concentrations in the Devils Lake Watershed Using Coupled SWAT and CE‐QUAL‐W2 , 2017 .

[6]  N. Fohrer,et al.  Assessing the impacts of Best Management Practices on nitrate pollution in an agricultural dominated lowland catchment considering environmental protection versus economic development. , 2017, Journal of environmental management.

[7]  Indrajeet Chaubey,et al.  Perennial rhizomatous grasses as bioenergy feedstock in SWAT: parameter development and model improvement , 2015 .

[8]  C. Ritsema,et al.  Emerging pollutants in the environment: A challenge for water resource management , 2015, International Soil and Water Conservation Research.

[9]  N. Fohrer,et al.  Smart low flow signature metrics for an improved overall performance evaluation of hydrological models , 2014 .

[10]  Karl Schneider,et al.  Development of a new downscaling method for hydrologic assessment of climate change impacts in data scarce regions and its application in the Western Ghats, India , 2015, Regional Environmental Change.

[11]  R. Govindaraju,et al.  How Do Land-Use and Climate Change Affect Watershed Health? A Scenario-Based Analysis , 2014, Water Quality, Exposure and Health.

[12]  Seong Joon Kim,et al.  Assessment of Future Climate Change Impact on Water Quality of Chungju Lake, South Korea, Using WASP Coupled with SWAT , 2013 .

[13]  Nicola Fohrer,et al.  Modeling daily chlorophyll a dynamics in a German lowland river using artificial neural networks and multiple linear regression approaches , 2013, Limnology.

[14]  Indrajeet Chaubey,et al.  Simulated watershed scale impacts of corn stover removal for biofuel on hydrology and water quality , 2012 .

[15]  Jeffrey G. Arnold,et al.  Soil and Water Assessment Tool Theoretical Documentation Version 2009 , 2011 .

[16]  Kyle R. Douglas-Mankin,et al.  Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) Hydrologic/Water Quality Model: Extended Capability and Wider Adoption , 2011 .

[17]  REPORT FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND THE COUNCIL , 2011 .

[18]  Nicola Fohrer,et al.  Incorporating landscape depressions and tile drainages of a northern German lowland catchment into a semi‐distributed model , 2010 .

[19]  N. Fohrer,et al.  Ecohydrological research in the German lowland catchment Kielstau , 2010 .

[20]  Jeffrey G. Arnold,et al.  New Developments in the SWAT Ecohydrology Model , 2010 .

[21]  Jeffrey G. Arnold,et al.  Differentiating Impacts of Land Use Changes from Pasture Management in a CEAP Watershed Using the SWAT Model , 2010 .

[22]  Raghavan Srinivasan,et al.  Coupling upland watershed and downstream waterbody hydrodynamic and water quality models (SWAT and CE-QUAL-W2) for better water resources management in complex river basins , 2008 .

[23]  Indrajeet Chaubey,et al.  Evaluation of landscape and instream modeling to predict watershed nutrient yields , 2007, Environ. Model. Softw..

[24]  Jeffrey G. Arnold,et al.  The Soil and Water Assessment Tool: Historical Development, Applications, and Future Research Directions , 2007 .

[25]  Jasper A Vrugt,et al.  Improved evolutionary optimization from genetically adaptive multimethod search , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[26]  R. Schwarzenbach,et al.  The Challenge of Micropollutants in Aquatic Systems , 2006, Science.

[27]  T. O. Barnwell,et al.  Importance of Field Data in Stream Water Quality Modeling Using QUAL2E-UNCAS , 2004 .

[28]  A. Saleh,et al.  EVALUATION OF SWAT AND HSPF WITHIN BASINS PROGRAM FOR THE UPPER NORTH BOSQUE RIVER WATERSHED IN CENTRAL TEXAS , 2004 .

[29]  R. Muir.  The Evaluation of Landscape , 1999 .

[30]  John R. Williams,et al.  LARGE AREA HYDROLOGIC MODELING AND ASSESSMENT PART I: MODEL DEVELOPMENT 1 , 1998 .

[31]  Robert L. Runkel,et al.  One-Dimensional Transport with Inflow and Storage (OTIS): A Solute Transport Model for Streams and Rivers , 1998 .

[32]  Scott A. Wells,et al.  CE-QUAL-W2: A Two-dimensional, Laterally Averaged, Hydrodynamic and Water Quality Model, Version 3.5 , 2006 .

[33]  J. L. Kittle,et al.  Hydrological simulation program: Fortran. User's manual for release 10 , 1993 .

[34]  R. Runkel,et al.  One-Dimensional Transport with Inflow and Storage (OTIS): A Solute Transport Model for Small Streams , 1991 .

[35]  Tim A. Wool,et al.  WASP4, a hydrodynamic and water-quality model - model theory, user's manual, and programmer's guide , 1988 .

[36]  Roy A. Walters,et al.  Simulation of solute transport in a mountain pool‐and‐riffle stream: A transient storage model , 1983 .

[37]  B. Bache,et al.  Soil and Water , 1971, Nature.

[38]  Emerging pollutants in the environment , 2022 .