On Progressive Failure Study of Composite Hypar Shell Roofs

Hyperbolic paraboloid (hypar) shell bounded by straight edges, an aesthetically appealing doubly curved anticlastic surface, which is easy to fabricate being doubly ruled, and is preferred as roofing units in many practical situations demanding large column free spaces. The skewed hypar shells are architecturally beautiful, easy to cast and are often preferred as roofing units. Laminated composite shells are frequently used in various engineering applications including aerospace, mechanical, marine and automotive engineering. Laminated composites gained popularity in civil engineering structures as use of these materials results in reduced mass and mass induced forces like seismic forces. Failure study of these materials is necessary, which includes the load value (first ply failure load) at which failure initiates and the failure propagation location and the ultimate load carrying capacity. The present article aims to study a comparative failure propagation of uniformly loaded simply supported hypar shells of different stacking orders using finite element method . An eight noded curved quadratic isoparametric shell element is used to develop the finite element program and validated through solution of benchmark problems. Well accepted failure criteria are used to evaluate the failure loads and failure propagation from engineering standpoint. While obtaining the failure loads, each lamina is considered to be under plane stress condition i.e. no transverse stresses are considered to act on any lamina. The results are analysed thoroughly and the paper ends with a number of conclusions of design significance.

[1]  Anand Srivastava,et al.  First ply failure analysis of laminated stiffened plates , 2003 .

[2]  S. Bhattacharyya,et al.  Progressive Failure Analysis of Cross-ply Laminated Composite Plates by Finite Element Method , 2007 .

[3]  T. Y. Kam,et al.  First-ply failure analysis of laminated composite plates based on the layerwise linear displacement theory , 1995 .

[4]  Dai Ying Liu,et al.  Progressive failure and post-buckling response of tapered composite plates , 2006 .

[5]  Chaitali Ray,et al.  Progressive Failure Analysis of Laminated Composite Plates by Finite Element Method , 2002 .

[6]  B. Gangadhara Prusty,et al.  Progressive Failure Analysis of Laminated Unstiffened and Stiffened Composite Panels , 2005 .

[7]  Ashwini Kumar,et al.  Postbuckling response and failure of symmetric laminates under in-plane shear , 1998 .

[8]  Tai-Yan Kam,et al.  Predictions of deflection and first-ply failure load of thin laminated composite plates via the finite element approach , 1996 .

[9]  A. K. Pandey,et al.  A first-ply failure analysis of composite laminates , 1987 .

[10]  A. K. Pandey,et al.  A post first-ply failure analysis of composite laminates , 1987 .

[11]  G. Akhras,et al.  Progressive failure analysis of thick composite plates using the spline finite strip method , 2007 .

[12]  D. Chakravorty,et al.  FiniteElement Vibration Characteristics of Composite Hypar Shallow Shells with Various Edge Supports , 2005 .

[13]  S. K. Satsangi,et al.  First ply failure analysis of stiffened panels – a finite element approach , 2001 .