The geographical dimension of innovation collaboration: Networking and innovation in Norway

This paper looks at the geographical dimension of firm networking in Norway, by examining the impact of manager-level, firm-level and regional-level variables on the decisions of firms to collaborate with partners at different levels of geographical distance. Using data stemming from a survey of 1604 businesses in five Norwegian city-regions, we model firms’ use of partners located within the region, elsewhere in the country and abroad, respectively. The results indicate that collaboration is affected in different ways by variables related to all three levels. At the level of the manager, trust is an important predictor of regional and national collaboration, but has no significant effect on the formation of international partnerships, which are fundamentally associated with factors such as education and the open-mindedness of managers. At the regional level, R&D expenditure tends to increase collaboration between regional actors, but reduces the likelihood of engagement with international partners. Education, by contrast, has the opposite effect: it encourages international collaboration at the expense of local links. The results highlight the need to balance policies for boosting regional social capital and R&D with investments in education and fostering open-mindedness as a means to prevent lock-in and develop innovation-enhancing global pipelines.

[1]  K. Morgan The Learning Region: Institutions, Innovation and Regional Renewal , 1997 .

[2]  Michael Fritsch,et al.  Determinants of the Efficiency of Regional Innovation Systems , 2011 .

[3]  R. Boschma Proximity and Innovation: A Critical Assessment , 2005 .

[4]  Y. Gingras,et al.  The place of universities in the system of knowledge production , 2000 .

[5]  Jeroen P.J. de Jong,et al.  Absorptive capacity and the reach of collaboration in high technology small firms , 2010 .

[6]  B. Ebersberger,et al.  Industrial Innovation Collaboration in a Capital Region Context , 2011 .

[7]  G. Hofstede THE INTERACTION BETWEEN NATIONAL AND ORGANIZATIONAL VALUE SYSTEMS[1] , 1985 .

[8]  E. Malecki Everywhere? The Geography of Knowledge , 2010 .

[9]  A. Rodríguez‐Pose,et al.  Innovation Prone and Innovation Averse Societies: Economic Performance in Europe , 1999 .

[10]  Bj⊘rn Asheim,et al.  Face-to-Face, Buzz, and Knowledge Bases: Sociospatial Implications for Learning, Innovation, and Innovation Policy , 2007 .

[11]  Cristina Chaminade,et al.  Globalisation of knowledge production and regional innovation policy: Supporting specialized hubs in the Bangalore software industry , 2008 .

[12]  L. Leydesdorff,et al.  The dynamics of innovation: from National Systems and , 2000 .

[13]  R. Putnam,et al.  Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy. , 1994 .

[14]  Gregory G. Dess,et al.  Clarifying the Entrepreneurial Orientation Construct and Linking It To Performance , 1996 .

[15]  B. Asheim,et al.  Regional Innovation Systems: The Integration of Local ‘Sticky’ and Global ‘Ubiquitous’ Knowledge , 2002 .

[16]  G. Duranton,et al.  Diversity and Specialisation in Cities: Why, Where and When Does it Matter? , 1999 .

[17]  E. Glaeser,et al.  Learning cities , 2018, Learning Cities in Late Antiquity.

[18]  H. Bathelt,et al.  Clusters and knowledge: local buzz, global pipelines and the process of knowledge creation , 2004 .

[19]  Jerker Moodysson,et al.  Principles and Practices of Knowledge Creation: On the Organization of “Buzz” and “Pipelines” in Life Science Communities , 2008 .

[20]  Philip Cooke,et al.  Knowledge Economies: Clusters, Learning and Cooperative Advantage , 2001 .

[21]  P. Cooke,et al.  The Associational Economy: Firms, Regions, and Innovation , 2000 .

[22]  Andrés Rodríguez-Pose,et al.  When local interaction does not suffice : Sources of firm innovation in urban Norway , 2011 .

[23]  H. Bathelt,et al.  International Trade Fairs and Global Buzz, Part I: Ecology of Global Buzz , 2010 .

[24]  A. Salter,et al.  Exploring the Effect of Geographical Proximity and University Quality on University–Industry Collaboration in the United Kingdom , 2011 .

[25]  A. Torre,et al.  Is geographical proximity necessary in the innovation networks in the era of global economy? , 1999 .

[26]  Marco Bellandi,et al.  Innovation and Change in the Marshallian Industrial District , 1996 .

[27]  J. Henderson Marshall&Apos;S Economies , 1999 .

[28]  A. Amin,et al.  Architectures of Knowledge: Firms, Capabilities, and Communities , 2004 .

[29]  F. Tödtling,et al.  Knowledge Sourcing Beyond Buzz and Pipelines: Evidence from the Vienna Software Sector , 2009 .

[30]  H. Etzkowitz Innovation in Innovation: The Triple Helix of University-Industry-Government Relations , 2002 .

[31]  S. Rosenthal,et al.  The attenuation of human capital spillovers , 2008 .

[32]  Rolf Sternberg,et al.  Do Manufacturing Firms Profit from Intraregional Innovation Linkages? An Empirical Based Answer , 2000 .

[33]  A. Torre On the Role Played by Temporary Geographical Proximity in Knowledge Transmission , 2008 .

[34]  A. Venables,et al.  Buzz: face-to-face contact and the urban economy , 2004 .

[35]  Michael Fritsch,et al.  Does R&D-Cooperation Behavior Differ between Regions? , 2003 .

[36]  E. Glaeser,et al.  Urban Resurgence and the Consumer City , 2006 .

[37]  H. Bathelt,et al.  International Trade Fairs and Global Buzz. Part II: Practices of Global Buzz , 2011 .

[38]  E. Glaeser,et al.  Growth in Cities , 1991, Journal of Political Economy.

[39]  Meric S. Gertler,et al.  Local Nodes in Global Networks: The Geography of Knowledge Flows in Biotechnology Innovation , 2005 .

[40]  J. Johanson,et al.  The Internationalization Process of the Firm—A Model of Knowledge Development and Increasing Foreign Market Commitments , 1977 .

[41]  E. Malecki,et al.  Extroverts and introverts: small manufacturers and their information sources , 1999 .

[42]  Loet Leydesdorff,et al.  Measuring the knowledge base of an economy in terms of triple-helix relations among 'technology, organization, and territory' , 2004, 0911.3414.

[43]  Loet Leydesdorff,et al.  Measuring the knowledge base of regional innovation systems in Germany in terms of a Triple Helix dynamics, Research Policy (forthcoming). , 2006 .

[44]  Anders Malmberg,et al.  Building global knowledge pipelines: The role of temporary clusters , 2006 .

[45]  André Torre,et al.  Proximity and Localization , 2005 .

[46]  Michaela Trippl Developing Cross‐Border Regional Innovation Systems: Key Factors And Challenges , 2010 .

[47]  G. Knight,et al.  Innovation, organizational capabilities, and the born-global firm , 2004 .

[48]  H. Kaiser The Application of Electronic Computers to Factor Analysis , 1960 .

[49]  Michael Fritsch,et al.  Who cooperates on R&D? , 2001 .

[50]  J. Barney,et al.  Organizational Culture: Can It Be a Source of Sustained Competitive Advantage? , 1986 .

[51]  Jill R. Kickul,et al.  Prospecting for Strategic Advantage: The Proactive Entrepreneurial Personality and Small Firm Innovation , 2002 .

[52]  A. Spithoven,et al.  The Spatial Organization of Innovation: Open Innovation, External Knowledge Relations and Urban Structure , 2008 .

[53]  Harald Bathelt,et al.  Buzz-and-Pipeline Dynamics: Towards a Knowledge-Based Multiplier Model of Clusters , 2007 .

[54]  Pablo D'Este,et al.  Papers in Evolutionary Economic Geography # 11 . 06 Shaping the formation of university-industry research collaborations : what type of proximity does really matter ? , 2011 .

[55]  Richard Shearmur Space, place and innovation: a distance‐based approach , 2010 .

[56]  L. Leydesdorff The triple helix: an evolutionary model of innovations , 2000 .

[57]  J. Coleman,et al.  Social Capital in the Creation of Human Capital , 1988, American Journal of Sociology.

[58]  R. Florida,et al.  Inside the Black Box of Regional Development - human capital, the creative class and tolerance , 2008 .

[59]  P. P. McDougall,et al.  Toward a theory of international new ventures , 1994 .

[60]  Mark Lorenzen,et al.  Social Capital and Localised Learning: Proximity and Place in Technological and Institutional Dynamics , 2007 .

[61]  B. Lundvall,et al.  The Learning Economy , 1994 .

[62]  Jan Schnellenbach,et al.  What do we know about geographical knowledge spillovers and regional growth?: A survey of the literature , 2006 .

[63]  B. Ebersberger,et al.  Go abroad or have strangers visit? On organizational search spaces and local linkages , 2012 .

[64]  M. Storper,et al.  The Increasing Importance of Geographical Proximity in Knowledge Production: An Analysis of US Patent Citations, 1975–1997 , 2008 .

[65]  T. Bunnell,et al.  Spaces and scales of innovation , 2001 .

[66]  A. Neely,et al.  Gaining from interactions with universities: multiple methods for nurturing absorptive capacity , 2008 .

[67]  Melvin M. Mark,et al.  The Relevance of Firm-Learning Theories to the Design and Evaluation of Manufacturing Modernization Programs , 1998 .