Technology-push and demand-pull factors in emerging sectors: evidence from the electric vehicle market

Abstract Despite consensus on the mutual dependence of the technology-push and demand-pull factors, their interactions can depend on industry life cycles and domestic market status. Using patent and Google search traffic data, this study brings robust evidence supporting the hypothesis that technology development occurs ahead of market demand in the U.S. electric vehicle sector, while this is not the case in Germany. Market demand does not precede technology development in either country. This shows the importance of the technology-push factor and the role of the lead market in the electric vehicle sector. This study elaborates technology-push and demand-pull hypotheses with a focus on industry life cycles and domestic market status and contributes to the discussion on technology-push, demand-pull and mixed policies in emerging sectors.

[1]  Paul Israel,et al.  The Sources of Innovation , 1990 .

[2]  B. Wee,et al.  The influence of financial incentives and other socio-economic factors on electric vehicle adoption , 2014 .

[3]  Clayton M. Christensen,et al.  CUSTOMER POWER, STRATEGIC INVESTMENT, AND THE FAILURE OF LEADING FIRMS , 1996 .

[4]  Philip M. Parker,et al.  "Globalization": Modeling Technology Adoption Timing Across Countries , 1997 .

[5]  G. Nemet.  Demand-pull, technology-push, and government-led incentives for non-incremental technical change , 2009 .

[6]  G. Judge,et al.  Searching for the picture: forecasting UK cinema admissions using Google Trends data , 2012 .

[7]  G. D. Stefano,et al.  Technology Push and Demand Pull Perspectives in Innovation Studies: Current Findings and Future Research Directions , 2012 .

[8]  Alan Pilkington,et al.  Innovation in disruptive regulatory environments: A patent study of electric vehicle technology development , 2006 .

[9]  Joeri Wesseling,et al.  Explaining variance in national electric vehicle policies , 2016 .

[10]  Christopher Lettl,et al.  Management of "technology push" development projects , 2004, International Journal of Technology Management.

[11]  P. Wells,et al.  Transition failure: Understanding continuity in the automotive industry , 2012 .

[12]  S. J. Kline,et al.  Innovation Is Not a Linear Process , 1985 .

[13]  Masaru Yarime,et al.  The emergence of hybrid-electric cars: Innovation path creation through co- evolution of supply and demand , 2010 .

[14]  Sonali K. Shah,et al.  How Communities Support Innovative Activities: An Exploration of Assistance and Sharing Among End-Users , 2003 .

[15]  Bart Verspagen,et al.  Demand and Innovation: Schmookler re-examined , 1990 .

[16]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  Demand Heterogeneity and Technology Evolution: Implications for Product and Process Innovation , 2001, Manag. Sci..

[17]  M. M. Andersen,et al.  Sectoral patterns versus firm-level heterogeneity - The dynamics of eco-innovation strategies in the automotive sector , 2017 .

[18]  Yan Carrière-Swallow,et al.  Nowcasting With Google Trends in an Emerging Market , 2013 .

[19]  Thomas Magnusson,et al.  Entering an era of ferment – radical vs incrementalist strategies in automotive power train development , 2011, Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag..

[20]  Wendy K. Smith,et al.  A Structural Approach to Assessing Innovation: Construct Development of Innovation Locus, Type, and Characteristics , 2002, Manag. Sci..

[21]  Christoph Hienerth,et al.  Exploring How Peer Communities Enable Lead User Innovations to Become Standard Equipment in the Industry: Community Pull Effects , 2011 .

[22]  Klaus Rennings,et al.  The impact of national environmental policy on the global success of next-generation automobiles , 2004 .

[23]  Jacob Schmookler,et al.  Invention and Economic Growth , 1967 .

[24]  Benyamin B. Lichtenstein,et al.  The Role of Organizational Learning in the Opportunity–Recognition Process , 2005 .

[25]  LevinthalDaniel,et al.  Demand Heterogeneity and Technology Evolution , 2001 .

[26]  G. Judge,et al.  Searching for the picture : forecasting UK cinema admissions making use of Google Trends data , 2010 .

[27]  David K. Guilkey,et al.  Small Sample Properties of Three Tests for Granger-Causal Ordering in a Bivariate Stochastic System , 1982 .

[28]  L. Orsenigo,et al.  In Defence of the Linear Model: An Essay , 2010 .

[29]  N. Park,et al.  Do the Performances of Innovative Firms Differ Depending on Market-oriented or Technology-oriented Strategies? , 2012 .

[30]  Christopher Lettl,et al.  Management of "technology push" development projects , 2004, Int. J. Technol. Manag..

[31]  Nathan,et al.  The influence of market demand upon innovation: A critical review of some recent empirical studies , 1993 .

[32]  Eric A. von Hippel,et al.  How Open Source Software Works: 'Free' User-to-User Assistance? , 2000 .

[33]  C. Granger.  Investigating causal relations by econometric models and cross-spectral methods , 1969 .

[34]  Vanessa Oltra,et al.  Variety of technological trajectories in low emission vehicles (LEVs) : a patent data analysis. , 2006 .

[35]  J. P. Lane,et al.  Pushes and Pulls , 2013 .

[36]  Malte Schneider,et al.  The Two Faces of Market Support , 2012 .

[37]  Jaeyong Song,et al.  The paradox of technological capabilities: a study of knowledge sourcing from host countries of overseas R&D operations , 2008 .

[38]  E. Andersen,et al.  National Systems of Innovation: Towards a Theory of Innovation and Interactive Learning , 1992 .

[39]  Wilfred Dolfsma,et al.  Technology-push, demand-pull and the shaping of technological paradigms - Patterns in the development of computing technology , 2002 .

[40]  C. Granger.  Investigating Causal Relations by Econometric Models and Cross-Spectral Methods , 1969 .

[41]  Lutz Kilian,et al.  A Practitioner's Guide to Lag-Order Selection for Vector Autoregressions , 2001 .

[42]  V. Costantini,et al.  Characterizing the policy mix and its impact on eco-innovation: A patent analysis of energy-efficient technologies , 2017 .

[43]  L. Anadón,et al.  The role of the complementary sector and its relationship with network formation and government policies in emerging sectors: : The case of solar photovoltaics between 2001 and 2009 , 2014 .

[44]  Mark P. Rice,et al.  Opportunity Recognition and Breakthrough Innovation in Large Established Firms , 2001 .

[45]  Lawrence M. Wein,et al.  Economics of Product Development by Users: the Impact of Sticky Local Information , 1998 .

[46]  J. Eliashberg,et al.  Demand and Supply Dynamics for Sequentially Released Products in International Markets: The Case of Motion Pictures , 2003 .

[47]  Jonathan Mellon,et al.  Where and When Can We Use Google Trends to Measure Issue Salience? , 2013, PS: Political Science & Politics.

[48]  M. Beise.  Lead markets: country-specific drivers of the global diffusion of innovations , 2004 .

[49]  E. von Hippel,et al.  Sources of Innovation , 2016 .

[50]  S. Wheelwright,et al.  Restoring Our Competitive Edge: Competing Through Manufacturing , 1984 .

[51]  John Geweke,et al.  Comparing alternative tests of causality in temporal systems: Analytic results and experimental evidence☆ , 1983 .

[52]  K. Zhou,et al.  The Effects of Strategic Orientations on Technology- and Market-Based Breakthrough Innovations , 2005 .

[53]  V. Hoffmann,et al.  The two faces of market support—How deployment policies affect technological exploration and exploitation in the solar photovoltaic industry , 2013 .

[54]  John Cantwell,et al.  MNE competence‐creating subsidiary mandates , 2005 .

[55]  Seung-Pyo Jun,et al.  A study of the method using search traffic to analyze new technology adoption , 2014 .

[56]  C. Granger,et al.  Co-integration and error correction: representation, estimation and testing , 1987 .

[57]  Mooweon Rhee,et al.  Great Vessels Take a Long Time to Mature: Early Success Traps and Competences in Exploitation and Exploration , 2015, Organ. Sci..

[58]  John A. Mathews,et al.  Knowledge flows in the solar photovoltaic industry: Insights from patenting by Taiwan, Korea, and China , 2012 .