Selection of Authentic Modelling Practices as Contexts for Chemistry Education

In science education, students should come to understand the nature and significance of models. In the case of chemistry education it is argued that the present use of models is often not meaningful from the students' perspective. A strategy to overcome this problem is to use an authentic chemical modelling practice as a context for a curriculum unit. The theoretical framework for this strategy is activity theory rooted in socio‐cultural theories on learning. An authentic chemical modelling practice is characterized by a set of motives for model development through a well‐defined modelling procedure using only relevant issue knowledge. The aim of this study was to explore, analyse, and select authentic chemical modelling practices for use in chemistry education. The suitability of the practices was reviewed by applying a stepwise procedure focused on criteria such as students' interest and ownership, modelling procedure, issue knowledge, and feasibility of the laboratory work in the classroom. It was concluded that modelling drinking‐water treatment and human exposure assessment are both suitable to serve as contexts, because both practices exhibit clear motives for model construction and the applied modelling procedures are in line with students' pre‐existing procedural modelling knowledge. The issue knowledge involved is consistent with present Dutch science curriculum, and it is possible to carry out experimental work in the classroom for model calibration and validation. The method described here to select and evaluate practices for use as contexts in chemistry education can also be used in other science domains.

[1]  David F. Treagust,et al.  Students' understanding of the role of scientific models in learning science , 2002 .

[2]  Mary E. Webb.  Beginning computer-based modelling in primary schools , 1994 .

[3]  Derek Hodson,et al.  In search of a meaningful relationship: an exploration of some issues relating to integration in science and science education , 1992 .

[4]  Piet Lijnse,et al.  “Developmental research” as a way to an empirically based “didactical structure” of science , 1995 .

[5]  John R. Anderson,et al.  The generality/specificity of expertise in scientific reasoning , 1999, Cogn. Sci..

[6]  J. Gilbert.  On the Nature of “Context” in Chemical Education , 2006 .

[7]  David F. Treagust,et al.  Secondary students' mental models of atoms and molecules: Implications for teaching chemistry , 1996 .

[8]  Albert Pilot,et al.  Approach to Designing Chemistry Education using Authentic Practices as Contexts , 2013 .

[9]  Albert Pilot,et al.  Characteristics of Meaningful Chemistry Education , 2005 .

[10]  Richard Lehrer,et al.  From Physical Models to Biomechanics: A Design-Based Modeling Approach. , 1998 .

[11]  Nico Verloop,et al.  Experienced teachers' knowledge of teaching and learning of models and modelling in science education , 2002 .

[12]  Joke Van Aalsvoort.  Activity theory as a tool to address the problem of chemistry's lack of relevance in secondary school chemical education , 2004 .

[13]  Bert van Oers,et al.  From context to contextualizing , 1998 .

[14]  R. Duschl,et al.  Strategies and Challenges to Changing the Focus of Assessment and Instruction in Science Classrooms. , 1997 .

[15]  Sibel Erduran,et al.  Philosophy of Chemistry: An Emerging Field with Implications for Chemistry Education. , 2001 .

[16]  K. Korb.  Explaining Science* , 1991, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science.

[17]  D. Kuhn.  Children and adults as intuitive scientists. , 1989, Psychological review.

[18]  Wolff-Michael Rolf.  Knowledge Diffusion in a Grade 4-5 Classroom during a Unit on Civil Engineering: An Analysis of a Classroom Community in Terms of Its Changing Resources and Practices. , 1996 .

[19]  David F. Treagust,et al.  A typology of school science models , 2000 .

[20]  Cindy E. Hmelo-Silver,et al.  ''It's Harder than We Thought It Would be": A Comparative Case Study of Expert---Novice Experimentation Strategies , 2002 .

[21]  J. Gilbert,et al.  Developing Models in Science Education , 2000 .

[22]  Wolff-Michael Roth,et al.  Where is the Context in Contextual Word Problems?: Mathematical Practices and Products in Grade 8 Students' Answers to Story Problems. , 1996 .

[23]  L. S. Vygotskiĭ,et al.  Mind in society : the development of higher psychological processes , 1978 .

[24]  Rosária Justi,et al.  Modelling, teachers' views on the nature of modelling, and implications for the education of modellers , 2002 .

[25]  Giorgio De Michelis,et al.  Designing for Communities , 2000, D-CSCW.

[26]  John K. Gilbert,et al.  The use of analogue models by students of chemistry at higher education level , 1991 .

[27]  N. Psarros.  What has Philosophy to Offer to Chemistry? , 1998 .

[28]  Albert Pilot,et al.  The Use of “Contexts” as a Challenge for the Chemistry Curriculum: Its successes and the need for further development and understanding , 2006 .

[29]  A. N. Leont’ev,et al.  Activity, consciousness, and personality , 1978 .

[30]  W. Robinson,et al.  Teaching Science Problem Solving: An Overview of Experimental Work , 2001 .

[31]  L. Schauble,et al.  Students' transition from an engineering model to a science model of experimentation , 1991 .

[32]  Nora H. Sabelli.  On Using Technology for Understanding Science , 1994, Interact. Learn. Environ..

[33]  John K. Gilbert,et al.  Learning Science Through Models and Modelling , 1998 .

[34]  J. L. Smith,et al.  Semi-Structured Interviewing and Qualitative Analysis , 1995 .

[35]  den E.D. Aantrekker.  Recontamination in food processing : quantitative modelling for risk assessment , 2002 .

[36]  Susan B. Shipley.  The research approach. , 1980, AORN journal.

[37]  Judith Bennett,et al.  Context-Based Approaches to the Teaching of Chemistry: What are They and What Are Their Effects? , 2002 .

[38]  Carol L. Smith,et al.  Understanding models and their use in science: Conceptions of middle and high school students and experts , 1991 .

[39]  J. Donnelly,et al.  Contested terrain or unified project? 'The nature of science' in the National Curriculum for England and Wales , 2001 .

[40]  Veen Mp van.  CONSEXPO 3.0, consumer exposure and uptake models , 2001 .

[41]  J. A. Caldwell.  WATER-FILTRATION , 1889, Science.

[42]  J. Osborne,et al.  Pupils' views of the role and value of the science curriculum: A focus-group study , 2001 .

[43]  Janice D. Gobert,et al.  Introduction to model-based teaching and learning in science education , 2000 .

[44]  M. Cole,et al.  Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. L. S. Vygotsky. , 1978 .

[45]  S. Erduran,et al.  Interdisciplinary Characterizations of Models and the Nature of Chemical Knowledge in the Classroom , 2004 .

[46]  Amy Pallant,et al.  Fostering Students' Epistemologies of Models via Authentic Model-Based Tasks , 2004 .