1-D modelling of conveyance, boundary shear and sediment transport in overbank flow

Several sets of experimental data on conveyance capacity, the division of flow between a main river channel and its floodplains, boundary shear, and sediment transport in overbank flow are presented. The strengths and weaknesses of various 1-D modelling approaches are highlighted. The coherence method (COHM) of Ackers [J. Hydraul. Res. 31 (1993) 509] and the weighted divided channel method (WDCM) of Lambert and Myers [Proc. Inst. Civil Engineers Water Maritime Energy 130 (1998) 84] are shown to be two useful 1-D methods for dealing with overbank flows. They are relatively simple to apply, and give not only the stage–discharge relationship, but also the division of flow between the main channel and the floodplains. Their general validity has been extended by testing the two methods against data sets other than those used in their original formulation.A modified version of the WDCM is presented that gives better predictions for homogeneously roughened channels. It is shown that the WDCM does not give good predictions for heterogeneously roughened compound channels. A comparison is made between the COHM and WDCM concerning their relative accuracy and ease of application for conveyance and boundary shear calculations. Finally, the COHM is applied to some mobile boundary compound channel data and shows that once the total and zonal channel discharges are calculated correctly, the sediment transport concentration may be predicted reasonably well for high discharges but not so well for low discharges and shallow floodplain depths, unless the boundary shear stress on the main channel bed is specified or calculated.

[1]  Donald W. Knight,et al.  The SERC Flood Channel Facility , 1987 .

[2]  Donald W. Knight,et al.  Resistance studies of overbank flow in rivers with sediment using the flood channel , 2001 .

[3]  Martin F. Lambert,et al.  ESTIMATING THE DISCHARGE CAPACITY IN STRAIGHT COMPOUND CHANNELS. , 1998 .

[4]  D. Knight,et al.  Boundary Shear in Symmetrical Compound Channels , 1984 .

[5]  D. Knight,et al.  Flood Plain and Main Channel Flow Interaction , 1983 .

[6]  Donald W. Knight,et al.  Sediment Transport in River Models with Overbank Flows , 2006 .

[7]  Donald W. Knight,et al.  REFINED CALIBRATION OF A DEPTH-AVERAGED MODEL FOR TURBULENT FLOW IN A COMPOUND CHANNEL. , 1996 .

[8]  D. Knight,et al.  Turbulence measurements in a shear layer region of a compound channel , 1990 .

[9]  Donald W. Knight,et al.  Stage-discharge prediction for rivers in flood applying a depth-averaged model , 2004 .

[10]  D. Knight,et al.  Turbulent open-channel flows with variable depth across the channel , 1991, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[11]  P. Ackers Flow formulae for straight two-stage channels , 1993 .

[12]  P Ackers,et al.  SEDIMENT TRANSPORT IN OPEN CHANNELS: ACKERS AND WHITE UPDATE. TECHNICAL NOTE. , 1993 .

[13]  D. Knight,et al.  Stage Discharge Relationships for Compound Channels , 1984 .

[14]  Influence of a mobile bed on the boundary shear in a compound channel , 2004 .

[15]  Peter Ackers,et al.  Sediment Transport: New Approach and Analysis , 1973 .

[16]  D. Knight,et al.  Wave speed–discharge relationship from cross-section survey , 2001 .

[17]  P. Ackers,et al.  1992 GERALD LACEY MEMORIAL LECTURE. CANAL AND RIVER REGIME IN THEORY AND PRACTICE: 1929-92. , 1992 .

[18]  J. Bathurst,et al.  The response of straight mobile bed channels to inbank and overbank flows , 1999 .