Pre-flight qualification test procedure for nanosatellites using sounding rockets

Abstract This work presents an innovative procedure to test nanosatellites subsystems on board sounding rockets. The procedure allows the subsystems to save their telemetry data during the whole rocket flight phases (including at the rocket lift-off). The subsystems of the FloripaSat (1U CubeSat) engineering model have been tested on board a VSB-30 rocket in order to validate their design and integration process. A dedicated embedded system has been proposed to operate as an electronic interface between the nanosatellite subsystems and the rocket electronics. Also, a system to process telemetry data was implemented on the ground station. The test procedure validates data frame definition, communication protocol specification, hardware integration specification, among other functionalities. Three FloripaSat subsystems have been tested: Electrical Power Subsystem (EPS); Telemetry, Tracking and Command (TTC and On Board Data Handling (OBDH). Several nanosatellites’ functions have been evaluated, including: battery monitoring; inertial measurement unit; temperature measurements; radio transceiver; and beacon. The flight results were considerably different from the results obtained at the laboratory. This has allowed important modifications to be made on the design of the CubeSat flight model as the revision on the radio circuit on TT&C and the implementation of an external battery charger circuit for the EPS.

[1]  Sabrina Corpino,et al.  Verification of a CubeSat via hardware-in-the-loop simulation , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems.

[2]  Renuganth Varatharajoo,et al.  Methodology for the development of combined energy and attitude control systems for satellites , 2002 .

[3]  Adnane Addaim,et al.  DSP implementation of integrated store-and-forward APRS payload and OBDH subsystems for low-cost small satellite , 2008 .

[4]  Hicham Chaoui,et al.  Adaptive State of Charge Estimation of Lithium-Ion Batteries With Parameter and Thermal Uncertainties , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology.

[5]  Alessandro Golkar,et al.  CubeSat evolution: Analyzing CubeSat capabilities for conducting science missions , 2017 .

[6]  Jian Guo,et al.  Survey of worldwide pico- and nanosatellite missions, distributions and subsystem technology , 2010 .

[7]  E. Glenn Lightsey,et al.  CubeSat mission design software tool for risk estimating relationships , 2014 .

[8]  Xibin Cao,et al.  Flexible platform based micro-satellite design method , 2016 .

[9]  Leonardo Kessler Slongo,et al.  Experimental testing of mini heat pipes under microgravity conditions aboard a suborbital rocket , 2015 .

[10]  Leonardo Maria Reyneri,et al.  Design of a University Nano-Satellite: the PiCPoT Case , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems.

[11]  Yasuyuki Miyazaki,et al.  A practical education of space engineering by using CanSat and pico-satellite - Fruitful collaboration with UNISEC for success of student satellite program - , 2013, 2013 6th International Conference on Recent Advances in Space Technologies (RAST).

[12]  Koji Nakaya,et al.  Titech micro-satellite model: CanSat for sub-orbital flight , 2000, 2000 IEEE Aerospace Conference. Proceedings (Cat. No.00TH8484).