An analysis of anatomic landmark mobility and setup deviations in radiotherapy for lung cancer.

PURPOSE To identify thoracic structures that exhibit little internal motion during irradiation and to determine setup variations in patients with lung cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS Intrafractional images were generated with an electronic portal-imaging device from the AP fields of 10 patients, during several fractions. To determine the intrafractional mobility of thoracic structures, visible structures were contoured in every image and matched with a reference image by means of a cross-correlation algorithm. Setup variations were determined by comparing portal images with the digitized simulator films using the stable structures as landmarks. RESULTS Mobility was limited in the lateral direction for the trachea, thoracic wall, paraspinal line, and aortic notch, and in the craniocaudal direction for the clavicle, aortic notch, and thoracic.wall. Analysis of patient setup revealed random deviations of 2.0 mm (1 SD) in the lateral direction and 2.8 mm in the craniocaudal direction, while the systematic deviations were 2.5 and 2.0 mm (1 SD) respectively. CONCLUSIONS We have identified thoracic structures that exhibit little internal motion in the frontal plane, and recommend that these structures be used for verifying patient setup during radiotherapy. The daily variation in the setup of lung cancer patients at our center appears to be acceptable.

[1]  M van Herk,et al.  A verification procedure to improve patient set-up accuracy using portal images. , 1993, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[2]  A G Visser,et al.  Quality assurance using portal imaging: the accuracy of patient positioning in irradiation of breast cancer. , 1993, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[3]  K L Lam,et al.  Measurement of patient setup errors using port films and a computer-aided graphical alignment tool. , 1996, Medical dosimetry : official journal of the American Association of Medical Dosimetrists.

[4]  J C Leong,et al.  Visualization of internal motion within a treatment portal during a radiation therapy treatment. , 1987, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[5]  A G Visser,et al.  A quality control study of the accuracy of patient positioning in irradiation of pelvic fields. , 1996, International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics.

[6]  J. Cox,et al.  Weekly localization films and detection of field placement errors. , 1978, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[7]  J Pouliot,et al.  The role of electronic portal imaging in tangential breast irradiation: a prospective study. , 1995, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[8]  A R Smith,et al.  Improved methods for determination of variability in patient positioning for radiation therapy using simulation and serial portal film measurements. , 1992, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[9]  Mageras,et al.  Control, Correction, and Modeling of Setup Errors and Organ Motion. , 1995, Seminars in radiation oncology.

[10]  R K Valicenti,et al.  Is weekly port filming adequate for verifying patient position in modern radiation therapy? , 1994, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[11]  P. Rodrigus,et al.  The value of treatment portal films in radiotherapy for bronchial carcinoma. , 1987, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[12]  T E Schultheiss,et al.  Intra- and interfractional reproducibility of tangential breast fields: a prospective on-line portal imaging study. , 1996, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[13]  J W Denham,et al.  Objective decision-making following a portal film: the results of a pilot study. , 1993, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[14]  M. Goitein,et al.  Accuracy of radiation field alignment in clinical practice. , 1985, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[15]  J Bijhold,et al.  Maximizing setup accuracy using portal images as applied to a conformal boost technique for prostatic cancer. , 1992, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[16]  A G Visser,et al.  Accuracy in radiation field alignment in head and neck cancer: a prospective study. , 1988, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.