Delaying judgments of learning affects memory, not metamemory
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] Robert A. Bjork,et al. Learning from tests: Effects of spacing , 1977 .
[2] A. Koriat. How do we know that we know? The accessibility model of the feeling of knowing. , 1993 .
[3] Gregg T. Vesonder,et al. On the ability to predict one's own responses while learning , 1985 .
[4] R. G. Crowder. Principles of learning and memory , 1977 .
[5] T. O. Nelson,et al. How Shall We Explain the Delayed-Judgment-Of-Learning Effect? , 1992 .
[6] A. Glenberg,et al. Component-levels theory of the effects of spacing of repetitions on recall and recognition , 1979, Memory & cognition.
[7] D. S. Lindsay,et al. Remembering Mistaken for Knowing: Ease of Retrieval as a Basis for Confidence in Answers to General Knowledge Questions , 1993 .
[8] Douglas L. Hintzman,et al. Theoretical implications of the spacing effect. , 1974 .
[9] D. L. Hintzman. Repetition and Memory1 , 1976 .
[10] R. Bjork,et al. The mismeasure of memory: when retrieval fluency is misleading as a metamnemonic index. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. General.
[11] Robert L. Greene,et al. Spacing effects in memory: evidence for a two-process account , 1989 .
[12] Ian Begg,et al. Memory predictions are based on ease of processing , 1989 .
[13] G. A. Allen,et al. Effects of recall tests on long-term retention of paired associates , 1969 .
[14] Lisa K. Son,et al. Metacognitive and control strategies in study-time allocation. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.
[15] John Dunlosky,et al. Does the Sensitivity of Judgments of Learning (JOLs) to the Effects of Various Study Activities Depend on When the JOLs Occur , 1994 .
[16] J. Metcalfe,et al. The cue-familiarity heuristic in metacognition. , 1993, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.
[17] T. O. Nelson. Metamemory: A Theoretical Framework and New Findings , 1990 .
[18] John Dunlosky,et al. Utilization of Metacognitive Judgments in the Allocation of Study During Multitrial Learning , 1994 .
[19] T. O. Nelson,et al. Importance of the kind of cue for judgments of learning (JOL) and the delayed-JOL effect , 1992, Memory & cognition.
[20] Thomas Sanocki,et al. Enhancing Calibration of Comprehension , 1987 .
[21] T. O. Nelson,et al. Judgments of learning are affected by the kind of encoding in ways that cannot be attributed to the level of recall. , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.
[22] Barbara A. Spellman,et al. When Predictions Create Reality: Judgments of Learning May Alter What They Are Intended to Assess , 1992 .
[23] C. A. Weaver,et al. Enhanced metamemory at delays: why do judgments of learning improve over time? , 1997, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.
[24] F. Craik,et al. Aging and metamemory: the roles of relatedness and imagery. , 1982, Journal of gerontology.
[25] C. A. Weaver,et al. Judgments of Learning at Delays: Shifts in Response Patterns or Increased Metamemory Accuracy? , 1997 .
[26] A. Koriat. Monitoring one's own knowledge during study : A cue-utilization approach to judgments of learning , 1997 .
[27] Janet Metcalfe,et al. Is study time allocated selectively to a region of proximal learning? , 2002, Journal of experimental psychology. General.
[28] T. O. Nelson,et al. When People's Judgments of Learning (JOLs) are Extremely Accurate at Predicting Subsequent Recall: The “Delayed-JOL Effect” , 1991 .
[29] T. O. Nelson,et al. A comparison of current measures of the accuracy of feeling-of-knowing predictions. , 1984, Psychological bulletin.
[30] Similarity between the Cue for Judgments of Learning (JOL) and the Cue for Test Is Not the Primary Determinant of JOL Accuracy , 1997 .
[31] R. L. Solso. Theories in cognitive psychology : the Loyola symposium , 1975 .