论文信息 - A criticism of studies comparing item-weighting methods. - 字舞流文

A criticism of studies comparing item-weighting methods.

Robert L. Mccornack | Robert L. McCornack

[1] J. Stalnaker. Weighting questions in the essay-type examination. , 1938 .

[2] D. Perry. Forced-choice vs. L-I-D response items in vocational interest measurement. , 1955 .

[3] J. W. Dunlap,et al. A simplified method for scoring the Strong Vocational Interest Blank. , 1941 .

[4] C. Jurgensen. Item weights in employee rating scales. , 1955 .

[5] M. Kendall,et al. An Introduction to the Theory of Statistics. , 1911 .

[6] Jack W. Dunlap,et al. Derivation and application of a unit scoring system for the strong vocational interest blank for women , 1942 .

[7] Sam C. Webb,et al. A Generalized Scale for Measuring Interest in Science Subjects , 1951 .

[8] J. Strong. Weighted vs. unit scales. , 1945 .

[9] A. J. Phillips. Further Evidence Regarding Weighted Versus Unweighted Scoring of Examinations , 1943 .

[10] E. Strong,et al. Efficiency plus economy in scoring an interest test. , 1935 .

[11] S. B. Sells,et al. A note on alternative methods for estimating factor scores. , 1955 .