Reduced sampling schedule for the glucose minimal model: importance of Bayesian estimation.

The minimal model (MM) of glucose kinetics during an intravenous glucose tolerance test (IVGTT) is widely used in clinical studies to measure metabolic indexes such as glucose effectiveness (S(G)) and insulin sensitivity (S(I)). The standard (frequent) IVGTT sampling schedule (FSS) for MM identification consists of 30 points over 4 h. To facilitate clinical application of the MM, reduced sampling schedules (RSS) of 13-14 samples have also been derived for normal subjects. These RSS are especially appealing in large-scale studies. However, with RSS, the precision of S(G) and S(I) estimates deteriorates and, in certain cases, becomes unacceptably poor. To overcome this difficulty, population approaches such as the iterative two-stage (ITS) approach have been recently proposed, but, besides leaving some theoretical issues open, they appear to be oversized for the problem at hand. Here, we show that a Bayesian methodology operating at the single individual level allows an accurate determination of MM parameter estimates together with a credible measure of their precision. Results of 16 subjects show that, in passing from FSS to RSS, there are no significant changes of point estimates in nearly all of the subjects and that only a limited deterioration of parameter precision occurs. In addition, in contrast with the previously proposed ITS method, credible confidence intervals (e.g., excluding negative values) are obtained. They can be crucial for a subsequent use of the estimated MM parameters, such as in classification, clustering, regression, or risk analysis.

[1]  R. Bellazzi,et al.  Compartmental model identification based on an empirical Bayesian approach: The case of thiamine kinetics in rats , 2001, Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing.

[2]  J F Boisvieux,et al.  Alternative approaches to estimation of population pharmacokinetic parameters: comparison with the nonlinear mixed-effect model. , 1984, Drug metabolism reviews.

[3]  Y. Z. Ider,et al.  Quantitative estimation of insulin sensitivity. , 1979, The American journal of physiology.

[4]  P Vicini,et al.  The iterative two-stage population approach to IVGTT minimal modeling: improved precision with reduced sampling. Intravenous glucose tolerance test. , 2001, American journal of physiology. Endocrinology and metabolism.

[5]  S. E. Ahmed,et al.  Markov Chain Monte Carlo: Stochastic Simulation for Bayesian Inference , 2008, Technometrics.

[6]  B. Dimitrov,et al.  Predicting end-stage renal disease: Bayesian perspective of information transfer in the clinical decision-making process at the individual level. , 2003, Kidney international.

[7]  C. Cobelli,et al.  A reduced sampling schedule for estimating the parameters of the glucose minimal model from a labeled IVGTT , 1991, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[8]  Giovanni Sparacino,et al.  Numerical non-identifiability regions of the minimal model of glucose kinetics: superiority of Bayesian estimation. , 2003, Mathematical biosciences.

[9]  Richard N Bergman,et al.  Reduced Sample Number for Calculation of Insulin Sensitivity and Glucose Effectiveness From the Minimal Model: Suitability for Use in Population Studies , 1993, Diabetes.

[10]  Ewart R. Carson,et al.  The mathematical modeling of metabolic and endocrine systems : model formulation, identification, and validation , 1983 .

[11]  C Cobelli,et al.  SAAM II: Simulation, Analysis, and Modeling Software for tracer and pharmacokinetic studies. , 1998, Metabolism: clinical and experimental.

[12]  David B. Dunson,et al.  Bayesian Data Analysis , 2010 .

[13]  M. Laakso,et al.  Long-term association of cardiovascular risk factors with impaired insulin secretion and insulin resistance. , 2000, Metabolism: clinical and experimental.

[14]  Gelfand,et al.  AD-A 254 769 BAYESIAN ANALYSIS OF LINEAR AND NONLINEAR POPULATION MODELS USING THE GIBBS SAMPLER , 2022 .

[15]  Adrian F. M. Smith,et al.  Bayesian Analysis of Linear and Non‐Linear Population Models by Using the Gibbs Sampler , 1994 .

[16]  Marie Davidian,et al.  Nonlinear Models for Repeated Measurement Data , 1995 .

[17]  R. Jacobs,et al.  Bayesian inference for hierarchical mixtures-of-experts with applications to regression and classification , 1996, Statistical methods in medical research.

[18]  Peter Green,et al.  Markov chain Monte Carlo in Practice , 1996 .

[19]  Giuseppe De Nicolao,et al.  Bayesian Function Learning Using MCMC Methods , 1998, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[20]  Giovanni Sparacino,et al.  Minimal model S(I)=0 problem in NIDDM subjects: nonzero Bayesian estimates with credible confidence intervals. , 2002, American journal of physiology. Endocrinology and metabolism.