AI to support decision making in collision risk assessment

This paper introduces an Artificial Intelligence(AI)-based system to support operators to manage the risk of collisions. The system implements an Artificial Neural Network (ANN) based technique to predict the risk of collision between two space objects, where one of the two is an operational satellite and the other one is a piece of space debris. The ANN-based technique provides a prediction of the Probability of Collision (PC), MOID and B-parameter between a primary satellite and a set of space debris objects during an interval of time starting from a database including the initial states synthetic space objects. Results of the system over a database of synthetic objects not previously seen during training show the good accuracy predicting the evolution of the aforementioned variables. The achieved results suggest that the proposed system can be able to implement in collision assessment as a method to identify - quickly, accurately and automatically - possible conjunctions between space objects in an interval of time with no use of dynamic models or orbit propagators. A revised calculation of the PC is also proposed to mitigate the Dilution of Probability that affects the usual definition of this quantity. This phenomenon gives the counterintuitive idea that the lower the quality of the data (or amount of information available to the operators), the smaller the probability of collision, which can lead to a false confidence in the likelihood of a collision or forces operators to accept very large margins. The method presented here will account for epistemic uncertainty under the assumption of Dempster-Shaffer’s Theory of Evidence which leads to the definition of confidence intervals on the probability of a collision. Confidence intervals incorporate the dependency of the probability of collision on the amount and quality of the available information, using the concepts of Belief and Plausibility introduced in Theory of Evidence. The result of this revised calculation of the PC is a more informed decision. At the same time, a lack of information can lead to a higher uncertainty on the decision to be made. Thus the paper will propose a possible approach to make optimal decisions under epistemic uncertainty where the cost of the decision is the risk associated with the decision are concurrently taken into account.

[1]  Aude Rondepierre,et al.  Fast and Accurate Computation of Orbital Collision Probability for Short-Term Encounters , 2016 .

[2]  Giovanni F. Gronchi On the Stationary Points of the Squared Distance between Two Ellipses with a Common Focus , 2002, SIAM J. Sci. Comput..

[3]  Holger Krag,et al.  SENSITIVITY OF THE SPACE DEBRIS ENVIRONMENT TO LARGE CONSTELLATIONS AND SMALL SATELLITES , 2017 .

[4]  Michael P. Gleason Establishing space traffic management standards, guidelines and best practices , 2020 .

[5]  P. L. Rosin,et al.  Improving neural network generalisation , 1995, 1995 International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium, IGARSS '95. Quantitative Remote Sensing for Science and Applications.

[6]  Kari Sentz,et al.  Combination of Evidence in Dempster-Shafer Theory , 2002 .

[7]  Jon C. Helton,et al.  Investigation of Evidence Theory for Engineering Applications , 2002 .

[8]  Giovanni F. Gronchi,et al.  An Algebraic Method to Compute the Critical Points of the Distance Function Between Two Keplerian Orbits , 2005 .

[9]  Hao Peng,et al.  Exploring Capability of Support Vector Machine for Improving Satellite Orbit Prediction Accuracy , 2018 .

[10]  Ramana V. Grandhi,et al.  Comparison of evidence theory and Bayesian theory for uncertainty modeling , 2004, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[11]  R. Patera General Method for Calculating Satellite Collision Probability , 2001 .

[12]  Lyle H. Ungar,et al.  A hybrid neural network‐first principles approach to process modeling , 1992 .

[13]  Scott Ferson,et al.  Satellite conjunction analysis and the false confidence theorem , 2017, Proceedings of the Royal Society A.

[14]  T.,et al.  Training Feedforward Networks with the Marquardt Algorithm , 2004 .

[15]  Salvatore Alfano,et al.  Probability of Collision: Valuation, variability, visualization, and validity , 2018 .

[16]  Hao Peng,et al.  Artificial Neural Network–Based Machine Learning Approach to Improve Orbit Prediction Accuracy , 2018 .

[17]  D. Vallado Fundamentals of Astrodynamics and Applications , 1997 .

[18]  Glenn Shafer,et al.  A Mathematical Theory of Evidence , 2020, A Mathematical Theory of Evidence.

[19]  Norbert Jankowski,et al.  Survey of Neural Transfer Functions , 1999 .

[20]  J. C. Helton,et al.  Uncertainty and sensitivity analysis in the presence of stochastic and subjective uncertainty , 1997 .

[21]  Dario Izzo,et al.  A survey on artificial intelligence trends in spacecraft guidance dynamics and control , 2018, Astrodynamics.

[22]  George Cybenko,et al.  Approximation by superpositions of a sigmoidal function , 1989, Math. Control. Signals Syst..

[23]  Massimiliano Vasile,et al.  Artificial intelligence in support to space traffic management , 2018 .

[24]  S. Flegel,et al.  Space debris collision probability analysis for proposed global broadband constellations , 2018, Acta Astronautica.

[25]  Matthew D. Hejduk,et al.  Evolution and Implementation of the NASA Robotic Conjunction Assessment Risk Analysis Concept of Operations , 2014 .

[26]  Moriba Jah DERIVATION OF THE B-PLANE (BODY PLANE) AND ITS ASSOCIATED PARAMETERS , 2002 .