Clinical investigation of the safety and efficacy of a cervical intraepithelial neoplasia treatment using a hyperthermia device that uses heat induced by alternating magnetic fields.

Multiple techniques have been used for the conservative treatment of high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (HG-CIN) in women of fertile age. Conization has been associated with stenosis of the cervix and a decrease in cervical mucus secretion, in addition to the increase in the risk of cervical canal shortening and problems during the perinatal period, including premature birth and premature rupture of membranes. Although the laser transpiration technique does not cause shortening of the cervical canal, it is associated with the recurrent risk of deep residual disease. The present study aimed to investigate the therapeutic safety and efficacy of the therapy performed using the transaction magnetic field induction heating device, AMTC400, in fertile patients with HG-CIN (excluding carcinoma in situ). Four premenopausal patients with CIN3 and high-risk human papilloma virus (HPV)-positive were treated using an AMTC400. Chronological colposcopic findings, high-risk HPV, final histological findings with conization and follow-up data were evaluated. All the treatments were successfully performed on the in-patients without anesthesia. Intra- and postoperative complications included minor pain and bleeding in all cases. Two of the cases (50%) were high-risk HPV-negative following the treatments. All cases exhibited a change in the observed color (to white), and subsequent epithelization following treatment. Although cytological analysis at 5 weeks following the treatment confirmed the cases were negative for intraepithelial lesions and malignancies, a definitive histology with conization 6 weeks following the treatment confirmed CIN1 and koilocytosis in all cases. The assessment of treatment effectiveness was determined as a moderate improvement in all cases. In conclusion, thermotherapy applied using AMTC400 represented a safe and effective treatment for HG-CIN in women of fertile age. However, additional improvements associated with the site of puncture needles are required. Further studies are required to confirm the long-term efficacy and reproductive outcomes.

[1]  S. Kōzuma,et al.  High‐risk human papillomavirus correlates with recurrence after laser ablation for treatment of patients with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 3: A long‐term follow‐up retrospective study , 2014, The journal of obstetrics and gynaecology research.

[2]  J. Biggio,et al.  Cervical conization and the risk of preterm delivery. , 2011, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[3]  W. Prendiville,et al.  Perinatal mortality and other severe adverse pregnancy outcomes associated with treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: meta-analysis , 2008, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[4]  Charlotte Paul,et al.  Natural history of cervical neoplasia and risk of invasive cancer in women with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 3: a retrospective cohort study. , 2008, The Lancet. Oncology.

[5]  William P Soutter,et al.  Incomplete excision of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and risk of treatment failure: a meta-analysis. , 2007, The Lancet. Oncology.

[6]  I. Milsom,et al.  Long term risk of invasive cancer after treatment for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3: population based cohort study , 2007, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[7]  P. Sasieni,et al.  Long‐term risk of invasive cervical cancer after treatment of squamous cervical intraepithelial neoplasia , 2006, International journal of cancer.

[8]  Y. Terai,et al.  Diagnostic and therapeutic laser conization for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. , 2006, Gynecologic oncology.

[9]  W. Melchers,et al.  Long-term follow-up after large-loop excision of the transformation zone: evaluation of 22 years treatment of high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia , 2005, International Journal of Gynecologic Cancer.

[10]  M Arbyn,et al.  Obstetric outcomes after conservative treatment for intraepithelial or early invasive cervical lesions: systematic review and meta-analysis , 2006, The Lancet.

[11]  J. Stockmaniii Treatment for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and risk of preterm delivery , 2004 .

[12]  A. Glass,et al.  Diagnoses and outcomes in cervical cancer screening: a population-based study. , 2004, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[13]  J. Whittaker,et al.  Treatment for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and risk of preterm delivery. , 2004, JAMA.

[14]  M. Fambrini,et al.  Laser CO2 vaporization for high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: a long-term follow-up series. , 2003, Gynecologic oncology.

[15]  Michel Roy,et al.  Long-term outcome of a randomized study comparing three techniques of conization: cold knife, laser, and LEEP. , 2003, European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology.

[16]  M. Krouse,et al.  New Technology for Deep Light Distribution in Tissue for Phototherapy , 2002, Cancer journal.

[17]  A. Herbert,et al.  Cervical screening in England and Wales: its effect has been underestimated , 2000, Cytopathology : official journal of the British Society for Clinical Cytology.

[18]  A. Lie,et al.  Residual and Recurrent Disease After Laser Conization for Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia , 1997, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[19]  M. Cruickshank,et al.  The 1993 British Society for Colposcopy and Cervical Pathology/National Coordinating Network United Kingdom Colposcopy Survey , 1995, British journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[20]  I. Miller,et al.  A population-based study of microinvasive disease of the cervix--a colposcopic and cytologic analysis. , 1992, Gynecologic oncology.

[21]  W. Prendiville,et al.  Large loop excision of the transformation zone (LLETZ). A new method of management for women with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia , 1989, British journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.