Wavelet-based algorithm for auto-detection of daily living activities of older adults captured by multiple inertial measurement units (IMUs)

A recent trend in human motion capture is the use of inertial measurement units (IMUs) for monitoring and performance evaluation of mobility in the natural living environment. Although the use of such systems have grown significantly, the development of methods and algorithms to process IMU data for clinical purposes is still limited. The aim of this work is to develop algorithms based on wavelet transform and discrete-time detection of events for the automatic segmentation of tasks related activities of daily living (ADL) from body worn IMUs. Seven healthy older adults (73  ±  4 years old) performed 10 ADL tasks in a simulated apartment during trials of different durations (3, 4, and 5 min). They wore a suit (Synertial UK Ltd IGS-180) comprised of 17 IMUs positioned strategically on body segments to capture full body motion. The proposed method automatically detected the number of template waveforms (representing each movement separately) using discrete wavelet transform (DWT) and discrete-time detection of events based on angular velocity, linear acceleration and 3D orientation data of pertinent IMUs. The sensitivity (Se.) and specificity (Sp.) of detection for the proposed method was established using time stamps of10tasks obtained from visual segmentation of each trial using the video records and the avatar provided by the system's software. At first, we identified six pertinent sensors that were strongly associated to different activities (at most two sensors/task) that allowed detection of tasks with high accuracy. The proposed algorithm exhibited significant global accuracy (N events  =  1999, Se.  =  97.5%, Sp.  =  94%), despite the variation in the occurrences of the performed tasks (free living). The Se. varied from 94% to 100% for all the detected ADL tasks and Sp. ranged from 90% to 100% with the worst Sp.  =  85 and 87% for Release_mid (reaching for object held just beyond reach at chest height) and Turning_Left tasks, respectively. This study demonstrated that DWT in conjunction with a nonlinear transform and auto-adaptive thresholding process for decision rules are highly efficient in detecting and segmenting tasks performed during free-living activities. This study also helped to determine the optimal number of sensors, and their location to detect such activities. This work lays the foundation for the automatic assessment of mobility performance within the segmented signals, as well as potentially helps differentiate populations based on their mobility patterns and symptomatology.

[1]  Merryn J Mathie,et al.  Accelerometry: providing an integrated, practical method for long-term, ambulatory monitoring of human movement , 2004, Physiological measurement.

[2]  Kamiar Aminian,et al.  Ambulatory system for human motion analysis using a kinematic sensor: monitoring of daily physical activity in the elderly , 2003, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[3]  J. D. Janssen,et al.  A triaxial accelerometer and portable data processing unit for the assessment of daily physical activity , 1997, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[4]  G. Schmidt,et al.  Inertial sensor technology trends , 2001 .

[5]  Marko Munih,et al.  Toward Real-Time Automated Detection of Turns during Gait Using Wearable Inertial Measurement Units , 2014, Sensors.

[6]  Jeroen H. M. Bergmann,et al.  Exploring the Use of Sensors to Measure Behavioral Interactions: An Experimental Evaluation of Using Hand Trajectories , 2014, PloS one.

[7]  Patrick Boissy,et al.  Auto detection and segmentation of physical activities during a Timed-Up-and-Go (TUG) task in healthy older adults using multiple inertial sensors , 2015, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[8]  H. Adeli,et al.  Analysis of EEG records in an epileptic patient using wavelet transform , 2003, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[9]  Sean Pearson,et al.  Continuous Monitoring of Turning in Patients with Movement Disability , 2013, Sensors.

[10]  Stéphane Mallat,et al.  A Theory for Multiresolution Signal Decomposition: The Wavelet Representation , 1989, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[11]  Joelle Pineau,et al.  Automatic Detection and Classification of Unsafe Events During Power Wheelchair Use , 2014, IEEE Journal of Translational Engineering in Health and Medicine.

[12]  A Moncada-Torres,et al.  Activity classification based on inertial and barometric pressure sensors at different anatomical locations , 2014, Physiological measurement.

[13]  D. Roetenberg,et al.  Xsens MVN: Full 6DOF Human Motion Tracking Using Miniature Inertial Sensors , 2009 .

[14]  M N Nyan,et al.  A wearable system for pre-impact fall detection. , 2008, Journal of biomechanics.

[15]  Hongnian Yu,et al.  Elderly activities recognition and classification for applications in assisted living , 2013, Expert Syst. Appl..

[16]  Robert Riener,et al.  Control strategies for active lower extremity prosthetics and orthotics: a review , 2015, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[17]  M. Mathie,et al.  Detection of daily physical activities using a triaxial accelerometer , 2003, Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing.

[18]  Patrick Boissy,et al.  User-based motion sensing and fuzzy logic for automated fall detection in older adults. , 2007, Telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association.

[19]  Fethi Bereksi-Reguig,et al.  QRS complex detection based on multi wavelet packet decomposition , 2011, Appl. Math. Comput..

[20]  Huosheng Hu,et al.  Human motion tracking for rehabilitation - A survey , 2008, Biomed. Signal Process. Control..

[21]  Szi-Wen Chen,et al.  A moving average based filtering system with its application to real-time QRS detection , 2003, Computers in Cardiology, 2003.

[22]  J. Allum,et al.  Gait event detection using linear accelerometers or angular velocity transducers in able-bodied and spinal-cord injured individuals. , 2006, Gait & posture.

[23]  K. Westerterp,et al.  Physical Activity Assessment With Accelerometers: An Evaluation Against Doubly Labeled Water , 2007, Obesity.

[24]  Daniele Giansanti,et al.  New neural network classifier of fall-risk based on the Mahalanobis distance and kinematic parameters assessed by a wearable device , 2008, Physiological measurement.

[25]  F. Horak,et al.  Role of Body-Worn Movement Monitor Technology for Balance and Gait Rehabilitation , 2014, Physical Therapy.

[26]  A K Bourke,et al.  Activity classification using a single chest mounted tri-axial accelerometer. , 2011, Medical engineering & physics.

[27]  Montse Pardàs,et al.  Activity Classification , 2009, Computers in the Human Interaction Loop.

[28]  Christopher R. Harris,et al.  Accurate and Reliable Gait Cycle Detection in Parkinson's Disease , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[29]  Rafael C González,et al.  Real-time gait event detection for normal subjects from lower trunk accelerations. , 2010, Gait & posture.

[30]  A K Bourke,et al.  Evaluation of a threshold-based tri-axial accelerometer fall detection algorithm. , 2007, Gait & posture.