Assessing the Effects of Data Selection with the DAO Physical-Space Statistical Analysis System*

Conventional optimal interpolation (OI) analysis systems solve the standard statistical analysis equations approximately, by invoking a local approximation and a data selection procedure. Although solution of the analysis equations is essentially exact in the recent generation of global spectral variational analysis systems, these new systems also include substantial changes in error covariance modeling, making it difficult to discern whether improvements in analysis and forecast quality are due to exact, global solution of the analysis equations, or to changes in error covariance modeling. The formulation and implementation of a new type of global analysis system at the Data Assimilation Office, termed the Physical-space Statistical Analysis System (PSAS), is described in this article. Since this system operates directly in physical space, it is capable of employing error covariance models identical to those of the predecessor OI system, as well as more advanced models. To focus strictly on the effect of global versus local solution of the analysis equations, a comparison between PSAS and OI analyses is carried out with both systems using identical error covariance models and identical data. Spectral decomposition of the analysis increments reveals that, relative to the PSAS increments, the OI increments have too little power at large horizontal scales and excessive power at small horizontal scales. The OI increments also display an unrealistically large ratio of divergence to vorticity. Dynamical imbalances in the OI-analyzed state can therefore be attributed in part to the approximate local method of solution, and are not entirely due to the simple geostrophic constraint built into the forecast error covariance model. Root-mean-square observation minus 6-h forecast errors in the zonal wind component are substantially smaller for the PSAS system than for the OI system.

[1]  A. Jazwinski Stochastic Processes and Filtering Theory , 1970 .

[2]  T. Kailath,et al.  An innovations approach to least-squares estimation--Part III: Nonlinear estimation in white Gaussian noise , 1971 .

[3]  Richard Asselin,et al.  Frequency Filter for Time Integrations , 1972 .

[4]  R. Sadourny The Dynamics of Finite-Difference Models of the Shallow-Water Equations , 1975 .

[5]  R. McPherson,et al.  The NMC Operational Global Data Assimilation System , 1979 .

[6]  Kenneth H. Bergman,et al.  Multivariate Analysis of Temperatures and Winds Using Optimum Interpolation , 1979 .

[7]  A. Lorenc A Global Three-Dimensional Multivariate Statistical Interpolation Scheme , 1981 .

[8]  A. Arakawa,et al.  Vertical Differencing of the Primitive Equations in Sigma Coordinates , 1983 .

[9]  A. Hollingsworth,et al.  The statistical structure of short-range forecast errors as determined from radiosonde data Part II: The covariance of height and wind errors , 1986 .

[10]  Anthony Hollingsworth,et al.  The statistical structure of short-range forecast errors as determined from radiosonde data , 1986 .

[11]  E. Brin,et al.  Experiments with a Three-Dimensional Statistical Objective Analysis Scheme Using FGGE Data , 1987 .

[12]  J. Labraga,et al.  Design of a Nonsingular Level 2.5 Second-Order Closure Model for the Prediction of Atmospheric Turbulence , 1988 .

[13]  Y. Sud,et al.  The roles of dry convection, cloud-radiation feedback processes and the influence of recent improvements in the parameterization of convection in the GLA GCM , 1988 .

[14]  John Derber,et al.  A Global Oceanic Data Assimilation System , 1989 .

[15]  Eric C. Hackert,et al.  Data Assimilation Applied to the Temperature and Circulation in the Tropical Atlantic, 1983–84 , 1990 .

[16]  R. Daley Atmospheric Data Analysis , 1991 .

[17]  S. Moorthi,et al.  Relaxed Arakawa-Schubert - A parameterization of moist convection for general circulation models , 1992 .

[18]  John Derber,et al.  The National Meteorological Center's spectral-statistical interpolation analysis system , 1992 .

[19]  R. Daley The Lagged Innovation Covariance: A Performance Diagnostic for Atmospheric Data Assimilation , 1992 .

[20]  Siegfried D. Schubert,et al.  Estimates of monthly mean soil moisture for 1979-1989 , 1992 .

[21]  J. R. Eyre,et al.  Assimilation of TOVS radiance information through one-dimensional variational analysis , 1993 .

[22]  Richard B. Rood,et al.  An assimilated dataset for Earth science applications , 1993 .

[23]  Andrea Molod,et al.  Technical report series on global modeling and data assimilation. Volume 1: Documentation of the Goddard Earth Observing System (GEOS) General Circulation Model, version 1 , 1994 .

[24]  P. Courtier,et al.  A strategy for operational implementation of 4D‐Var, using an incremental approach , 1994 .

[25]  Ricardo Todling,et al.  A fixed-lag Kalman smoother for retrospective data assimilation , 1994 .

[26]  James Pfaendtner,et al.  Inclusion of Special Sensor Microwave/imager (SSM/I) Total Precipitable Water Estimates into the GEOS-1 Data Assimilation System , 1995 .

[27]  Michael Seablom,et al.  Technical report series on global modeling and data assimilation. Volume 4: Documentation of the Goddard Earth Observing System (GEOS) data assimilation system, version 1 , 1995 .

[28]  Lawrence L. Takacs,et al.  Data Assimilation Using Incremental Analysis Updates , 1996 .

[29]  R. Todling,et al.  Approximate Data Assimilation Schemes for Stable and Unstable Dynamics , 1996 .

[30]  Philippe Courtier,et al.  Dynamical structure functions in a four‐dimensional variational assimilation: A case study , 1996 .

[31]  Philippe Courtier,et al.  Dual formulation of four‐dimensional variational assimilation , 1997 .

[32]  S. Cohn,et al.  An Introduction to Estimation Theory , 1997 .

[33]  P. Courtier,et al.  The ECMWF implementation of three‐dimensional variational assimilation (3D‐Var). II: Structure functions , 1998 .

[34]  Ricardo Todling,et al.  Suboptimal Schemes for Retrospective Data Assimilation Based on the Fixed-Lag Kalman Smoother , 1998 .

[35]  P. Courtier,et al.  The ECMWF implementation of three‐dimensional variational assimilation (3D‐Var). I: Formulation , 1998 .

[36]  J. Joiner,et al.  Efficient methods to Assimilate Satellite Retrievals Based on Information Content, Part 2: Suboptimal Retrieval Assimilation , 1998 .

[37]  Philippe Courtier,et al.  The ECMWF implementation of three-dimensional variational assimilation ( 3 D-Var ) . 111 : Experimental results , 2006 .

[38]  H. Q. Ding,et al.  An 18 GFLOPS parallel climate data assimilation PSAS package , 1998 .

[39]  John Derber,et al.  The Use of TOVS Cloud-Cleared Radiances in the NCEP SSI Analysis System , 1998 .

[40]  Arlindo da Silva,et al.  Data assimilation in the presence of forecast bias , 1998 .

[41]  James Demmel,et al.  LAPACK Users' Guide, Third Edition , 1999, Software, Environments and Tools.

[42]  S. Cohn,et al.  Ooce Note Series on Global Modeling and Data Assimilation Construction of Correlation Functions in Two and Three Dimensions and Convolution Covariance Functions , 2022 .

[43]  C.,et al.  Analysis methods for numerical weather prediction , 2022 .