Utilities of gossip across organizational levels

Gossip is a subject that has been studied by researchers from an array of disciplines with various foci and methods. We measured the content of language use by members of a competitive sports team across 18 months, integrating qualitative ethnographic methods with quantitative sampling and analysis. We hypothesized that the use of gossip will vary significantly depending on whether it is used for self-serving or group-serving purposes. Our results support a model of gossip derived from multilevel selection theory that expects gossip to serve group-beneficial rules when rewards are partitioned at the group level on a scale that permits mutual monitoring. We integrate our case study with earlier studies of gossip conducted by anthropologists, psychologists, and management researchers.

[1]  E. Smith.  Why do good hunters have higher reproductive success? , 2004, Human nature.

[2]  H. Gintis,et al.  The evolution of strong reciprocity: cooperation in heterogeneous populations. , 2004, Theoretical population biology.

[3]  D. Wilson,et al.  Gossip and other aspects of language as group-level adaptations , 2000 .

[4]  P. Griffiths,et al.  Review: Unto Others: The Evolution and Psychology of Unselfish Behavior , 2002 .

[5]  C. Boehm,et al.  Impact of the Human Egalitarian Syndrome on Darwinian Selection Mechanics , 1997, The American Naturalist.

[6]  Rick Delbridge,et al.  News From Behind My Hand: Gossip in Organizations , 1993 .

[7]  J. Pennebaker,et al.  The sounds of social life: a psychometric analysis of students' daily social environments and natural conversations. , 2003, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[8]  Steve Rayner,et al.  Egalitarian Behavior and Reverse Dominance Hierarchy [and Comments and Reply] , 1993, Current Anthropology.

[9]  John B. Haviland,et al.  Gossip, Reputation, and Knowledge in Zinacantan , 1977 .

[10]  R. Paine.  What is Gossip About? An Alternative Hypothesis , 1967 .

[11]  B. Hamilton,et al.  Team Incentives and Worker Heterogeneity: An Empirical Analysis of the Impact of Teams on Productivity and Participation , 2001 .

[12]  J. Mann,et al.  Time sampling: a methodological critique. , 1991, Child development.

[13]  I. Mysterud.  Unto others: The evolution and psychology of unselfish behavior , 1999 .

[14]  M. Gluckman,et al.  Papers in Honor of Melville J. Herskovits: Gossip and Scandal , 1963, Current Anthropology.

[15]  L. Cosmides,et al.  The Adapted mind : evolutionary psychology and the generation of culture , 1992 .

[16]  D. Wilson,et al.  Emotions and actions associated with norm-breaking events , 2003, Human nature.

[17]  D. Simester,et al.  Firm-Wide Incentives and Mutual Monitoring at Continental Airlines , 2001 .

[18]  Robin I. M. Dunbar.  Grooming, Gossip and the Evolution of Language , 1996 .

[19]  C. Boehm,et al.  The natural selection of altruistic traits , 1999, Human nature.

[20]  U. Fischbacher,et al.  Strong reciprocity, human cooperation, and the enforcement of social norms , 2002, Human nature.

[21]  Nancy B. Kurland,et al.  Passing the Word: Toward a Model of Gossip and Power in the Workplace , 2000 .

[22]  M Acheson James.  The lobster gangs of Maine. , 1990 .

[23]  Sally Engle Merry,et al.  Rethinking Gossip and Scandal , 1984 .

[24]  Robin I. M. Dunbar.  Coevolution of neocortical size, group size and language in humans , 1993, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[25]  J. Bowlby.  Attachment and loss: retrospect and prospect. , 1969, The American journal of orthopsychiatry.

[26]  I. Eibl-Eibesfeldt,et al.  Emergency Decisions, Cultural-Selection Mechanics, and Group Selection [and Comments and Reply] , 1996, Current Anthropology.

[27]  Francis T. McAndrew,et al.  Of Tabloids and Family Secrets: The Evolutionary Psychology of Gossip1 , 2002 .

[28]  Robin I. M. Dunbar,et al.  Human conversational behavior , 1997, Human nature.

[29]  L. Glover.  Communication and consultation in a greenfield site company , 2001 .

[30]  W. Muir,et al.  Group selection for adaptation to multiple-hen cages: selection program and direct responses. , 1996, Poultry science.

[31]  O. Leimar,et al.  The evolution of cooperation in mobile organisms , 1993, Animal Behaviour.

[32]  D. Wilson,et al.  Artificial selection of microbial ecosystems for 3-chloroaniline biodegradation. , 2000, Environmental microbiology.

[33]  Robert A. Foley,et al.  The adaptive legacy of human evolution: A search for the environment of evolutionary adaptedness , 2005 .

[34]  R. Boyd,et al.  The evolution of altruistic punishment , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[35]  D. Wilson,et al.  Altruism from an Evolutionary Perspective , 2003 .

[36]  Robin I. M. Dunbar,et al.  Social network size in humans , 2003, Human nature.

[37]  C. Goodnight,et al.  Experimental Studies of Group Selection: What Do They Tell US About Group Selection in Nature? , 1997, The American Naturalist.

[38]  D. Wilson.  Darwin's Cathedral: Evolution, Religion, and the Nature of Society , 2002 .

[39]  D. Wilson,et al.  Multilevel selection and the social transmission of behavior , 1999, Human nature.

[40]  L. Cosmides,et al.  The psychological foundations of culture. , 1992 .

[41]  Robert C. Ellickson.  Order without law : how neighbors settle disputes , 2009 .

[42]  J.J.H. Bartholomée,et al.  Campell, Donald T. , 2005 .

[43]  David Sloan Wilson,et al.  The Effect of Nonphysical Traits on the Perception of Physical Attractiveness: Three Naturalistic Studies , 2004 .

[44]  E. Ostrom,et al.  Rules, Games, and Common-Pool Resources , 1994 .

[45]  Michael J. Prietula,et al.  Advice, Trust, and Gossip Among Artificial Agents , 2000 .

[46]  Mobbing: Emotional Abuse in the American Workplace , 1999 .

[47]  Robert C. Ellickson,et al.  Order Without Law: How Neighbors Settle Disputes , 1991 .

[48]  H. Giles,et al.  The New Handbook of Language and Social Psychology , 2001 .