Simulating F-22 Heavy Maintenance and Modifications workforce multi-skilling

The U.S. Air Force aircraft maintenance depots face complex operating environments due to the diversity of aircraft or mission design series (MDS) maintained by each depot and the variability of maintenance requirements for each MDS. Further complicating their operations is the variability of maintenance actions required from one aircraft to another within each MDS and a highly specialized workforce that has inherent inflexibility to compensate for the workload variability. Air Force Materiel Command is reviewing maintenance personnel multi-skilling as a method to efficiently absorb the variability of workload and maintenance requirements between aircraft. Using a simulation built in ARENA 14®, we studied the F-22 Heavy Maintenance Modification Program through a series of designed experiments. Our study analyzes whether using a multi-skilled workforce impacts the productivity of depot maintenance personnel through simulation of several multi-skilling policies.

[1]  Enid Mumford,et al.  Reengineering the Corporation: A Manifesto for Business Revolution , 1995 .

[2]  F. Al-Shamali,et al.  Author Biographies. , 2015, Journal of social work in disability & rehabilitation.

[3]  Susan M. Sanchez,et al.  Work smarter, not harder: guidelines for designing simulation experiments , 2005, Proceedings of the Winter Simulation Conference, 2005..

[4]  Thomas W. Lucas,et al.  Efficient Nearly Orthogonal and Space-Filling Latin Hypercubes , 2007, Technometrics.

[5]  Margaret J. Robertson,et al.  Design and Analysis of Experiments , 2006, Handbook of statistics.

[6]  Tovey C. Bachman,et al.  Optimizing Spares Support: The Aircraft Sustainability Model. , 1996 .

[7]  J.S. Carson,et al.  Model verification and validation , 2002, Proceedings of the Winter Simulation Conference.

[8]  S. Covey.  The seven habits of highly effective people : restoring the character ethic , 1989 .

[9]  John O. Miller,et al.  An analytical approach to Low Observable maintenance practices using simulation and marginal analysis , 2011, Proceedings of the 2011 Winter Simulation Conference (WSC).

[10]  J. Carson.  Introduction to modeling and simulation , 2005, Proceedings of the Winter Simulation Conference, 2005..

[11]  P. S. Park,et al.  The examination of worker cross-training in a dual resource constrained job shop , 1991 .

[12]  Mark R. Grabau,et al.  Tips for Successful Practice of Simulation , 2005, Proceedings of the Winter Simulation Conference, 2005..

[13]  Averill Law.  Simulation Modeling and Analysis with Expertfit Software , 2006 .

[14]  James P. Womack,et al.  Lean Thinking: Banish Waste and Create Wealth in Your Corporation , 1996 .

[15]  J. Banks,et al.  Discrete-Event System Simulation , 1995 .

[16]  Averill M. Law,et al.  Simulation Modeling & Analysis , 1991 .

[17]  John D. C. Little,et al.  Models and Managers: The Concept of a Decision Calculus , 2016, Manag. Sci..

[18]  Richard de Neufville,et al.  Applied systems analysis , 1990 .

[19]  Julie L. Swann,et al.  Simple Procedures for Selecting the Best Simulated System When the Number of Alternatives is Large , 2001, Oper. Res..