An integro-differential non-local model for cell migration and its efficient numerical solution

Abstract Cell migration is fundamental in a wide variety of physiological and pathological phenomena, being exploited in biomedical engineering as well. In this respect, we here present a hybrid non-local integro-differential model where a representative cell, reproduced by a point particle with an orientation, moves on a planar domain upon signals coming from environmental variables. From a numerical point of view, non-locality implies the need to evaluate integral terms which may present non-regular integrand functions because of heterogeneities in the environmental conditions and/or in cell sensing region. Having in mind multicellular applications, we here propose a robust computational method able to handle such non-regularities. The procedure is based on low order Runge–Kutta methods and on an ad hoc application of the Gauss–Legendre quadrature rule. The accuracy and efficiency of the resulting computational method is then tested by selected benchmark settings. In this context, the ad hoc application of the quadrature rule reveals to be crucial to obtain a high accuracy with a remarkably low number of quadrature nodes with respect to the standard Gauss–Legendre quadrature formula, and which thus results in a reduced overall computational cost. Finally, the proposed method is further coupled with the cubic spline interpolation scheme which allows to deal also with possible poor (i.e., point-wise defined) molecular spatial information. The performed simulations (which accounts also for different scenarios) show how the interpolation of the molecular variables affects the efficiency of the overall method and further justify the proposed procedure.

[1]  Marco Scianna,et al.  Adhesion and volume constraints via nonlocal interactions determine cell organisation and migration profiles. , 2018, Journal of theoretical biology.

[2]  S. Etienne-Manneville,et al.  Cdc42 - the centre of polarity , 2004, Journal of Cell Science.

[3]  Anne J. Ridley,et al.  The small GTP-binding protein rac regulates growth factor-induced membrane ruffling , 1992, Cell.

[4]  K. Painter,et al.  Modelling chase-and-run migration in heterogeneous populations , 2019, Journal of Mathematical Biology.

[5]  Erik Sahai,et al.  Illuminating the metastatic process , 2007, Nature Reviews Cancer.

[6]  S. Goodman,et al.  The E8 subfragment of laminin promotes locomotion of myoblasts over extracellular matrix , 1989, The Journal of cell biology.

[7]  L. Preziosi,et al.  A Cellular Potts Model of single cell migration in presence of durotaxis. , 2016, Mathematical biosciences.

[8]  M. Chaplain,et al.  MATHEMATICAL MODELLING OF CANCER INVASION: THE IMPORTANCE OF CELL–CELL ADHESION AND CELL–MATRIX ADHESION , 2011 .

[9]  Massimo Fornasier,et al.  Particle, kinetic, and hydrodynamic models of swarming , 2010 .

[10]  Ronald N Germain,et al.  Stromal cell networks regulate lymphocyte entry, migration, and territoriality in lymph nodes. , 2006, Immunity.

[11]  Micah Dembo,et al.  Influence of type I collagen surface density on fibroblast spreading, motility, and contractility. , 2003, Biophysical journal.

[12]  L Greengard,et al.  Fast Algorithms for Classical Physics , 1994, Science.

[13]  K. Painter Modelling cell migration strategies in the extracellular matrix , 2009, Journal of mathematical biology.

[14]  M. Stack,et al.  Multi-step pericellular proteolysis controls the transition from individual to collective cancer cell invasion , 2007, Nature Cell Biology.

[15]  Roberto Natalini,et al.  A hybrid mathematical model of collective motion under alignment and chemotaxis , 2015, ArXiv.

[16]  P. Friedl,et al.  The Journal of Cell Biology , 2002 .

[17]  R T Tranquillo,et al.  Neuronal contact guidance in magnetically aligned fibrin gels: effect of variation in gel mechano-structural properties. , 2001, Biomaterials.

[18]  Lorenzo Pareschi,et al.  Binary Interaction Algorithms for the Simulation of Flocking and Swarming Dynamics , 2012, Multiscale Model. Simul..

[19]  Colin McCann,et al.  Cell speed, persistence and information transmission during signal relay and collective migration , 2010, Journal of Cell Science.

[20]  A. Bertozzi,et al.  Two-species particle aggregation and stability of co-dimension one solutions , 2014 .

[21]  Eric Theveneau,et al.  Chase-and-run between adjacent cell populations promotes directional collective migration , 2013, Nature Cell Biology.

[22]  Vittorio Cristini,et al.  Patient-calibrated agent-based modelling of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS): from microscopic measurements to macroscopic predictions of clinical progression. , 2012, Journal of theoretical biology.

[23]  Benjamin Geiger,et al.  Cell spreading and focal adhesion dynamics are regulated by spacing of integrin ligands. , 2007, Biophysical journal.

[24]  Dirk Drasdo,et al.  On Selected Individual-based Approaches to the Dynamics in Multicellular Systems , 2003 .

[25]  Luigi Preziosi,et al.  Multiscale Developments of the Cellular Potts Model , 2012, Multiscale Model. Simul..

[26]  P. Friedl,et al.  Collective cell migration in morphogenesis, regeneration and cancer , 2009, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[27]  Philip Rabinowitz,et al.  Methods of Numerical Integration , 1985 .

[28]  M. Dembo,et al.  Cell movement is guided by the rigidity of the substrate. , 2000, Biophysical journal.

[29]  Richard A. Firtel,et al.  Spatial and Temporal Regulation of 3-Phosphoinositides by PI 3-Kinase and PTEN Mediates Chemotaxis , 2002, Cell.

[30]  A. Fiorio Pla,et al.  Endothelial calcium machinery and angiogenesis: understanding physiology to interfere with pathology. , 2009, Current medicinal chemistry.

[31]  Alan Hall,et al.  Rho GTPases Control Polarity, Protrusion, and Adhesion during Cell Movement , 1999, The Journal of cell biology.

[32]  A. Kashina,et al.  Cell biology of embryonic migration. , 2008, Birth defects research. Part C, Embryo today : reviews.

[33]  Carl de Boor,et al.  A Practical Guide to Splines , 1978, Applied Mathematical Sciences.

[34]  R. Natalini,et al.  A hybrid model of collective motion of discrete particles under alignment and continuum chemotaxis , 2020, Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B.

[35]  J. Segall,et al.  Intravital imaging of cell movement in tumours , 2003, Nature Reviews Cancer.

[36]  Leslie Greengard,et al.  A fast algorithm for particle simulations , 1987 .

[37]  Sean P. Palecek,et al.  Integrin-ligand binding properties govern cell migration speed through cell-substratum adhesiveness , 1997, Nature.

[38]  Jacco van Rheenen,et al.  Collagen-based cell migration models in vitro and in vivo. , 2009, Seminars in cell & developmental biology.

[39]  Alissa M. Weaver,et al.  Tumor Morphology and Phenotypic Evolution Driven by Selective Pressure from the Microenvironment , 2006, Cell.

[40]  K. Painter,et al.  A continuum approach to modelling cell-cell adhesion. , 2006, Journal of theoretical biology.

[41]  Dennis Discher,et al.  Substrate compliance versus ligand density in cell on gel responses. , 2004, Biophysical journal.

[42]  R. Mayor,et al.  In vivo confinement promotes collective migration of neural crest cells , 2022 .

[43]  P. Friedl,et al.  Tumour-cell invasion and migration: diversity and escape mechanisms , 2003, Nature Reviews Cancer.

[44]  Richard B. Dickinson,et al.  Biased cell migration of fibroblasts exhibiting contact guidance in oriented collagen gels , 1994, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[45]  Li Chen,et al.  Mathematical models for cell migration: a non-local perspective , 2019, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B.

[46]  L. Preziosi,et al.  A hybrid mathematical model for self-organizing cell migration in the zebrafish lateral line , 2013, Journal of mathematical biology.

[47]  J. Lambert Numerical Methods for Ordinary Differential Systems: The Initial Value Problem , 1991 .