References Subscriptions Permissions Email Alerts Direct Ex Vivo Analysis of Human CD4+ Memory T Cell Activation Requirements at the Single Clonotype Level

CD4+ memory T cells continuously integrate signals transmitted through the TCR and costimulatory molecules, only responding when the intensity of such signals exceeds an intrinsic activation threshold. Recent data suggest that these activation thresholds can be regulated independently of TCR specificity, and that threshold tuning may constitute a major mechanism for controlling T cell effector activity. In this work we take advantage of the profound clonotypic hierarchies of the large human CD4+ T cell response to CMV to study activation thresholds of fresh (unexpanded) memory T cells at the clonotypic level. We identified dominant responses to CMV matrix determinants mediated by single TCRB sequences within particular TCR-Vβ families. The specific response characteristics of these single, Ag-specific, TCRB-defined clonotypes could be unequivocally determined in fresh PBMC preparations by cytokine flow cytometry with gating on the appropriate Vβ family. These analyses revealed 1) optimal peptides capable of eliciting specific responses by themselves at doses as low as 2 pg/ml, with each log increase in dose eliciting ever-increasing frequencies of responding cells over a 4- to 5-log range; 2) significant augmentation of response frequencies at all submaximal peptide doses by CD28- and CD49d-mediated costimulation; 3) differential dose response and costimulatory characteristics for IFN-γ and IL-2 responses; and 4) no association of activation requirements with the CD27-defined CD4+ T cell memory differentiation pathway. Taken together these data confirm that triggering heterogeneity exists within individual CD4+ memory T cell clonotypes in vivo and demonstrate that such single clonotypes can manifest qualitatively different functional responses depending on epitope dose and relative levels of costimulation.

[1]  D. Vignali,et al.  T cell receptor recognition of MHC class II-bound peptide flanking residues enhances immunogenicity and results in altered TCR V region usage. , 1997, Immunity.

[2]  E. Wierenga,et al.  Different Levels of T-Cell Receptor Triggering Induce Distinct Functions in Hepatitis B and Hepatitis C Virus-Specific Human CD4+ T-Cell Clones , 2001, Journal of Virology.

[3]  F. Sallusto,et al.  Dynamics of T lymphocyte responses: intermediates, effectors, and memory cells. , 2000, Science.

[4]  Z. Grossman,et al.  Autoreactivity, dynamic tuning and selectivity. , 2001, Current opinion in immunology.

[5]  E. Bröcker,et al.  Antigen presentation in extracellular matrix: interactions of T cells with dendritic cells are dynamic, short lived, and sequential. , 2000, Immunity.

[6]  Antonio Lanzavecchia,et al.  T Cell Activation Determined by T Cell Receptor Number and Tunable Thresholds , 1996, Science.

[7]  M. Trucco,et al.  Analysis of the alpha/beta T-cell receptor repertoire by competitive and quantitative family-specific PCR with exogenous standards and high resolution fluorescence based CDR3 size imaging. , 1997, Journal of immunological methods.

[8]  G. Freeman,et al.  Changes in the strength of co-stimulation through the B7/CD28 pathway alter functional T cell responses to altered peptide ligands. , 1999, International immunology.

[9]  Antonio Lanzavecchia,et al.  Regulation of T Cell Immunity by Dendritic Cells , 2001, Cell.

[10]  Andrew W. Liu,et al.  Distinct T Cell Interactions with HLA Class II Tetramers Characterize a Spectrum of TCR Affinities in the Human Antigen-Specific T Cell Response1 , 2000, The Journal of Immunology.

[11]  L. Nicholson,et al.  Tuning T cell activation threshold and effector function with cross-reactive peptide ligands. , 2000, International immunology.

[12]  T. Mak,et al.  Distinct roles for LFA-1 and CD28 during activation of naive T cells: adhesion versus costimulation. , 1997, Immunity.

[13]  Z. Grossman,et al.  Cellular Tolerance as a Dynamic State of the Adaptable Lymphocyte , 1993, Immunological reviews.

[14]  R. Schwartz,et al.  Adaptive Tolerance of CD4+ T Cells In Vivo: Multiple Thresholds in Response to a Constant Level of Antigen Presentation , 2001, The Journal of Immunology.

[15]  J. McCune,et al.  Restoration of cytomegalovirus-specific CD4+ T-lymphocyte responses after ganciclovir and highly active antiretroviral therapy in individuals infected with HIV-1 , 1998, Nature Medicine.

[16]  C. Pitcher,et al.  Determination of antigen-specific memory/effector CD4+ T cell frequencies by flow cytometry: evidence for a novel, antigen-specific homeostatic mechanism in HIV-associated immunodeficiency. , 1997, The Journal of clinical investigation.

[17]  R. Germain,et al.  Single Cell Analysis Reveals Regulated Hierarchical T Cell Antigen Receptor Signaling Thresholds and Intraclonal Heterogeneity for Individual Cytokine Responses of CD4+ T Cells , 1997, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[18]  Z. Grossman,et al.  Adaptive cellular interactions in the immune system: the tunable activation threshold and the significance of subthreshold responses. , 1992, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[19]  Boris Barbour,et al.  Functional antigen-independent synapses formed between T cells and dendritic cells , 2001, Nature Immunology.

[20]  Roland Martin,et al.  Dendritic cells signal T cells in the absence of exogenous antigen , 2001, Nature Immunology.

[21]  A. Lanzavecchia,et al.  Expression of two T cell receptor alpha chains: dual receptor T cells. , 1993, Science.

[22]  C. Pitcher,et al.  Use of overlapping peptide mixtures as antigens for cytokine flow cytometry. , 2001, Journal of immunological methods.

[23]  D. Metcalfe,et al.  Flow cytometric analysis for cytokine production identifies T helper 1, T helper 2, and T helper 0 cells within the human CD4+CD27- lymphocyte subpopulation. , 1995, Journal of immunology.

[24]  F. Sallusto,et al.  Antigen decoding by T lymphocytes: from synapses to fate determination , 2001, Nature Immunology.

[25]  R. V. van Lier,et al.  Regulation of CD27 expression on subsets of mature T-lymphocytes. , 1993, Journal of immunology.

[26]  Eric J. Kunkel,et al.  CCR7 Expression and Memory T Cell Diversity in Humans1 , 2001, The Journal of Immunology.

[27]  Hans-Georg Rammensee,et al.  MHC Ligands and Peptide Motifs , 1998, Molecular Biology Intelligence Unit.

[28]  Z. Grossman,et al.  Self-tolerance: context dependent tuning of T cell antigen recognition. , 2000, Seminars in immunology.

[29]  P. Kourilsky,et al.  T-cell repertoire diversity and clonal expansions in normal and clinical samples. , 1995, Immunology today.

[30]  Bernhard O. Boehm,et al.  A T Cell Clone’s Avidity Is a Function of Its Activation State1 , 2001, The Journal of Immunology.

[31]  F. Sallusto,et al.  Two subsets of memory T lymphocytes with distinct homing potentials and effector functions , 1999, Nature.

[32]  J. Strominger,et al.  Amino acid residues that flank core peptide epitopes and the extracellular domains of CD4 modulate differential signaling through the T cell receptor , 1994, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[33]  A. Smolyar,et al.  The crystal structure of a T cell receptor in complex with peptide and MHC class II. , 1999, Science.

[34]  V. Maino,et al.  Normal human CD4+ memory T cells display broad heterogeneity in their activation threshold for cytokine synthesis. , 1998, Journal of immunology.

[35]  R. Koup,et al.  Analysis of Total Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV)-Specific CD4+ and CD8+ T-Cell Responses: Relationship to Viral Load in Untreated HIV Infection , 2001, Journal of Virology.

[36]  C. Pitcher,et al.  HIV-1-specific CD4+ T cells are detectable in most individuals with active HIV-1 infection, but decline with prolonged viral suppression , 1999, Nature Medicine.

[37]  T. Mak,et al.  T cell responses are governed by avidity and co‐stimulatory thresholds , 1996, European journal of immunology.

[38]  M. Rep,et al.  Heterogeneity of the circulating human CD4+ T cell population. Further evidence that the CD4+CD45RA-CD27- T cell subset contains specialized primed T cells. , 1995, Journal of immunology.

[39]  H. Kalbacher,et al.  Activation of T cells by the ragged tail of MHC class II-presented peptides of the measles virus fusion protein. , 1996, International immunology.

[40]  J. Elliott Dual Vα T cells , 1999, Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences CMLS.

[41]  A. Khoruts,et al.  Visualizing the generation of memory CD4 T cells in the whole body , 2001, Nature.

[42]  C. Goodnow Balancing immunity and tolerance: deleting and tuning lymphocyte repertoires. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[43]  Mark M. Davis,et al.  The Avidity Spectrum of  T Cell Receptor Interactions Accounts for T Cell Anergy in a Double Transgenic Model , 1999, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[44]  Andreas Radbruch,et al.  Regulation of expression of IL-4 alleles: analysis using a chimeric GFP/IL-4 gene. , 2001, Immunity.

[45]  R. Germain,et al.  Relationships among TCR ligand potency, thresholds for effector function elicitation, and the quality of early signaling events in human T cells. , 1998, Journal of immunology.

[46]  A. Lanzavecchia,et al.  Migration and Function of Antigen-Primed Nonpolarized T Lymphocytes in Vivo , 2001, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[47]  W. Paul,et al.  Lymphocyte responses and cytokines , 1994, Cell.

[48]  L. Davis,et al.  Expression of CD45RB and CD27 identifies subsets of CD4+ memory T cells with different capacities to induce B cell differentiation. , 1995, Journal of immunology.

[49]  C. Pitcher,et al.  Clonotypic Structure of the Human CD4+ Memory T Cell Response to Cytomegalovirus1 , 2001, The Journal of Immunology.