Abstract Peak vertical accelerations from a suite of 585 strong ground motion records from 76 worldwide earthquakes are fit to an attenuation model that has a magnitude dependent shape. The regression uses a two-step procedure that is a hybrid of the Joyner and Boore (1981) and Campbell (1981) regression methods. The resulting vertical attenuation relation is log 10 a v ( g ) = − 1.15 + 0.245 M − 1.096 log 10 ( r + e 0.256 M ) + 0.096 F − 0.0011 E r , where M is magnitude, r is the distance in kilometers to the closest approach of the zone of energy release, F is a dummy variable that is 1 for reverse or reverse oblique events and 0 otherwise, and E is a dummy variable that is 1 for interplate events and 0 for intraplate events. The standard error of log 10 a v is 0.296. Because the vertical to horizontal acceleration ratio is also sought, the attenuation of the horizontal peaks from the same suite of records is also obtained using the same regression procedure. The resulting horizontal attenuation relation is log 10 a H ( g ) = − 0.62 + 0.177 M − 0.982 log 10 ( r + e 0.284 M ) + 0.132 F − 0.0008 E r , where a H is the peak acceleration of the larger of the two horizontal components. The standard error of log 10 a H is 0.277. The expected ratio of peak vertical to peak horizontal strong ground motion predicted by these equations is enveloped by the widely used rule-of-thrumb value of two-thirds for earthquakes with magnitudes less than 7.0 and distances greater than 20 km. The expected ratio exceeds 1.0 for earthquakes with magnitudes greater than 8.0 at very short distances. The standard error of log 10 ( V/H ) is 0.20, which is less than the standard error of either the vertical or horizontal acceleration. Therefore, the peak vertical and horizontal accelerations for a given record are strongly correlated and we can have more confidence in the predicted ratio than in either the predicted vertical or horizontal peaks.
[1]
N. Abrahamson.
Statistical properties of peak ground accelerations recorded by the SMART 1 array
,
1988
.
[2]
J. Enrique Luco.
On strong ground motion estimates based on models of the radiated spectrum
,
1985
.
[3]
Norman A. Abrahamson,et al.
The SMART I Accelerograph Array (1980-1987): A Review
,
1987
.
[4]
W. B. Joyner,et al.
Measurement, Characterization, and Prediction of Strong Ground Motion
,
1988
.
[5]
Kenneth W. Campbell,et al.
Strong Motion Attenuation Relations: A Ten-Year Perspective
,
1985
.
[6]
A new attenuation relationship for peak ground accelerations derived from strong-motion accelerograms.
,
1989
.
[7]
Gail M. Atkinson,et al.
STOCHASTIC PREDICTION OF GROUND MOTION AND SPECTRAL RESPONSE PARAMETERS AT HARD-ROCK SITES IN EASTERN NORTH AMERICA
,
1987
.
[8]
David M. Boore,et al.
Peak horizontal acceleration and velocity from strong motion records including records from the 1979 Imperial Valley, California, earthquake
,
1981
.
[9]
Antonio Pugliese,et al.
Attenuation of peak horizontal acceleration and velocity from italian strong-motion records
,
1987
.
[10]
Kenneth W. Campbell,et al.
Near-source attenuation of peak horizontal acceleration
,
1981
.
[11]
W. J. Hall,et al.
Earthquake spectra and design
,
1982
.
[12]
Robin K. McGuire,et al.
AN INVESTIGATION INTO EARTHQUAKE GROUND MOTION CHARACTERISTICS IN EASTERN NORTH AMERICA
,
1987
.