Design Study Comparison of Plain Finned Versus Louvered Finned-Tube Condenser Heat Exchangers

Enhanced fins are widely used in residential air conditioning system finned-tube condenser designs. While this heat transfer augmentation technique increases the heat transfer coefficient in the heat exchanger, it also increases the air side frictional pressure drop. These two effects compete with each other, making it difficult to determine the relative goodness between plain fin versus enhanced fin designs with realistic constraints. In the past, this design tradeoff has been largely determined by experimental trial and error or heuristic figures of merit. No studies are available showing the effect of fin augmentation on overall system performance under consistent cost and frontal area constraints. The residential air conditioning system model calculates all component and system performance parameters. The condenser design requires the specification of approximately ten design parameters. A search method is used to vary these ten parameters and reach an optimum design based on a COP (efficiency) figure-of-merit with condenser cost and other appropriate constraints. It was found that when optimized, louvered fin designs always show better system performance than the optimum plain fin design for the cases studied. However a decrease in system efficiency can result if louvers are merely added to a plain fin optimum design.© 2003 ASME

[1]  Urmila M. Diwekar,et al.  Optimal Design of Heat Exchangers: A Genetic Algorithm Framework , 1999 .

[2]  Chi-Chuan Wang,et al.  A comparative study of compact enhanced fin-and-tube heat exchangers , 2001 .

[3]  Chi-Chuan Wang,et al.  Some Aspects of Plate Fin-and-Tube Heat Exchangers: With and Without Louvers , 1999 .

[4]  L. Friedel.  Improved Friction Pressure Drop Correlation for Horizontal and Vertical Two-Phase Pipe Flow , 1979 .

[5]  Kwan-Soo Lee,et al.  Influence of design parameters on the heat transfer and flow friction characteristics of the heat exchanger with slit fins , 2000 .

[6]  Ralph L. Webb,et al.  Performance Comparison of Enhanced Fin Geometries Used in Fin-and-Tube Heat Exchangers , 1998 .

[7]  Jerald D. Parker,et al.  Heating, Ventilating, and Air Conditioning: Analysis and Design , 1977 .

[8]  Chi-Chuan Wang,et al.  A generalized friction correlation for louver fin geometry , 2000 .

[9]  Jeffrey C. Lagarias,et al.  Convergence Properties of the Nelder-Mead Simplex Method in Low Dimensions , 1998, SIAM J. Optim..

[10]  M. F. Wright,et al.  Plate-Fin-And-Tube condenser perfomance and design for a refrigerant R-410A air-conditioner , 2000 .

[11]  Chi-Chuan Wang,et al.  An investigation of the airside performance of the slit fin-and-tube heat exchangers. , 1999 .

[12]  Chi-Chuan Wang,et al.  An experimental study of the airside performance of the superslit fin-and-tube heat exchangers , 2000 .

[13]  J. W. Ramsey,et al.  Thermal Environmental Engineering , 1970 .

[14]  K. Aspelund,et al.  Optimization of plate-fin-and-tube condenser performance and design for refrigerant R-410A air-conditioner , 2001 .

[15]  D. Chisholm.  Two-Phase Flow in Pipelines and Heat Exchangers , 1983 .

[16]  Chi-Chuan Wang,et al.  Comprehensive Study of Convex-Louver and Wavy Fin-and-Tube Heat Exchangers , 1998 .

[17]  Chi-Chuan Wang,et al.  Heat transfer and friction characteristics of plain fin-and-tube heat exchangers, part I: new experimental data , 2000 .

[18]  Chi-Chuan Wang.  Technology Review - A Survey of Recent Patents of Fin-and-Tube Heat Exchangers , 2000 .

[19]  C F Colebrook,et al.  TURBULENT FLOW IN PIPES, WITH PARTICULAR REFERENCE TO THE TRANSITION REGION BETWEEN THE SMOOTH AND ROUGH PIPE LAWS. , 1939 .

[20]  Nae-Hyun Kim,et al.  HEAT TRANSFER AND FRICTION CORRELATIONS FOR WAVY PLATE FIN-AND-TUBE HEAT EXCHANGERS , 1996 .

[21]  John A. Nelder,et al.  A Simplex Method for Function Minimization , 1965, Comput. J..

[22]  Chi-Chuan Wang,et al.  Heat transfer and friction correlation for compact louvered fin-and-tube heat exchangers , 1999 .