Patterns of invasion in temperate nature reserves

The extent of plant invasions was studied in 302 nature reserves located in the Czech Republic, central Europe. Lists of vascular plant species were obtained for each reserve, alien species were divided into archaeophytes and neophytes (introduced before and after 1500, respectively). The statistical analysis using general linear models made it possible to identify the effects of particular variables. Flora representation by neophytes decreased with altitude (explained 23.8% of variance) while, with archaeophytes, the effect of altitude depended on their interaction with native species in particular vegetation types. The proportion of neophytes increased with increasing density of human population. Both the number and proportion of aliens plants significantly increased with increasing number of native species in a reserve. This relationship was affected by altitude, and after filtering out this variable, the effect remained positive for neophytes but became negative for archaeophytes in humid grasslands. The positive relationship between neophytes and native species is not a mere side effect of species–area relationship of native flora, but indicates that the two groups do not directly compete. Vegetation type alone explained 14.2 and 55.5% of variation in proportion of aliens in regions of mesophilous and mountain flora, respectively. Humid grasslands were the least invaded vegetation type. Positioning the reserve within large protected sections of landscape significantly decreases probability of it being invaded by potentially invasive alien species. Within the context of SLOSS debate, a new model — several small inside single large (SSISL) — is suggested as an appropriate solution from the viewpoint of plant invasions to nature reserves. # 2002 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.

[1]  F. Kruger,et al.  The ecology and management of biological invasions in southern Africa. , 1986 .

[2]  P. McCullagh,et al.  Generalized Linear Models , 1972, Predictive Analytics.

[3]  Jonathan M. Levine,et al.  Elton revisited: a review of evidence linking diversity and invasibility , 1999 .

[4]  Petr Pyšek,et al.  Invasion by Heracleum mantegazzianum in different habitats in the Czech Republic , 1995 .

[5]  M. Holdgate.  Summary and conclusions: characteristics and consequences of biological invasions , 1986 .

[6]  R. May,et al.  Stability and Complexity in Model Ecosystems , 1976, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[7]  W. M. Lonsdale,et al.  GLOBAL PATTERNS OF PLANT INVASIONS AND THE CONCEPT OF INVASIBILITY , 1999 .

[8]  E. Fuentes,et al.  Introduced species in nature reserves in Mediterranean-type climatic regions of the world , 1988 .

[9]  D. Gordon.  Effects of invasive, non-indigenous plant species on ecosystem processes: lessons from Florida. , 1998 .

[10]  Harold A. Mooney,et al.  EFFECTS OF SOIL RESOURCES ON PLANT INVASION AND COMMUNITY STRUCTURE IN CALIFORNIAN SERPENTINE GRASSLAND , 1990 .

[11]  Marcel Rejmánek,et al.  Invasive plant species and invasible ecosystems. , 1999 .

[12]  Richard L. Anderson,et al.  Biological invasions of arid land nature reserves , 1988 .

[13]  D. Simberloff.  Design of nature reserves , 1986 .

[14]  P. Pyšek,et al.  On the terminology used in plant invasion studies. , 1995 .

[15]  M. Usher,et al.  Biological invasions into tropical nature reserves. , 1991 .

[16]  D. Collett.  Modelling Binary Data , 1991 .

[17]  John J. Berger.  Ecological restoration and nonindigenous plant species: a review , 1993 .

[18]  Peter Kareiva,et al.  Conservation biology: for the coming decade. , 1998 .

[19]  R. Primack.  A Primer of Conservation Biology , 1995 .

[20]  M. Williamson,et al.  Quantitative Aspects of the Ecology of Biological Invasions , 1990 .

[21]  P. Pyšek,et al.  Plant invasions : general aspects and special problems , 1995 .

[22]  Anthony G. Rebelo,et al.  Where Should Nature Reserves Be Located in the Cape Floristic Region, South Africa? Models for the Spatial Configuration of a Reserve Network Aimed at Maximizing the Protection of Floral Diversity , 1992 .

[23]  Harold A. Mooney,et al.  Ecology of Biological Invasions of North America and Hawaii , 1986, Ecological Studies.

[24]  C. J. West,et al.  Naturalization and invasion of alien plants: concepts and definitions , 2000 .

[25]  M Rejmánek,et al.  Plant invasions — the role of mutualisms , 2000, Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[26]  C. Elton.  The Ecology of Invasions by Animals and Plants , 1960, Springer US.

[27]  Peter M. Vitousek,et al.  Biological invasions and ecosystem processes : towards an integration of population biology and ecosystem studies , 1990 .

[28]  R. Hobbs,et al.  Effect of disturbance and nutrient addition on native and introduced annuals in plant communities in the Western Australian wheatbelt , 1988 .

[29]  D. Tilman.  THE ECOLOGICAL CONSEQUENCES OF CHANGES IN BIODIVERSITY: A SEARCH FOR GENERAL PRINCIPLES101 , 1999 .

[30]  M. Usher,et al.  The ecology of biological invasions into nature reserves: An introduction , 1988 .

[31]  Mark A. Davis,et al.  Fluctuating resources in plant communities: a general theory of invasibility , 2000 .

[32]  P. M. Wade,et al.  Predicting the response of the introduced species Fallopia japonica and Impatiens glandulifera to global climatic change. , 1994 .

[33]  Dukes,et al.  Does global change increase the success of biological invaders? , 1999, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[34]  D. R. Cox,et al.  The analysis of binary data , 1971 .

[35]  T. Kučera,et al.  Plant species richness of nature reserves: the interplay of area, climate and habitat in a central European landscape , 2002, Global ecology and biogeography : a journal of macroecology.

[36]  David Tilman,et al.  COMMUNITY INVASIBILITY, RECRUITMENT LIMITATION, AND GRASSLAND BIODIVERSITY , 1997 .

[37]  J. P. Grime,et al.  An Experimental Study of Plant Community Invasibility , 1996 .

[38]  Charles C. Elton,et al.  The Ecology of Invasions by Animals and Plants. , 1959 .

[39]  S. M. Timmins,et al.  Weed numbers in New Zealand's forest and scrub reserves , 1991 .

[40]  F. Schroeder,et al.  Zur klassifizierung der Anthropochoren , 1968, Vegetatio.

[41]  Michael J. Crawley,et al.  GLIM for Ecologists , 1994 .

[42]  C. Schultz,et al.  Challenges in Insect Conservation: Managing Fluctuating Populations In Disturbed Habitats , 1998 .

[43]  M. Usher,et al.  Biological invasions of nature reserves: A search for generalisations , 1988 .

[44]  Thomas J. Stohlgren,et al.  EXOTIC PLANT SPECIES INVADE HOT SPOTS OF NATIVE PLANT DIVERSITY , 1999 .

[45]  James A. Drake,et al.  Biological invasions : a global perspective , 1989 .

[46]  David N. Cole,et al.  Threats to Wilderness Ecosystems: Impacts and Research Needs , 1996 .

[47]  Eric R. Ziegel,et al.  Generalized Linear Models , 2002, Technometrics.

[48]  M. Rejmánek.  A theory of seed plant invasiveness: The first sketch , 1996 .

[49]  D. A. Webb.  What are the criteria for presuming native status , 1985 .

[50]  P. Pyšek.  Alien and native species in Central European urban floras: a quantitative comparison , 1998 .

[51]  V. Pivello,et al.  Alien grasses in Brazilian savannas: a threat to the biodiversity , 1999, Biodiversity & Conservation.

[52]  Michael Green,et al.  The GLIM system : release 4 manual , 1993 .

[53]  P. Reich,et al.  Effects of plant species richness on invasion dynamics, disease outbreaks, insect abundances and diversity. , 1999, Ecology letters.