Uncertainty in biomass supply estimates: Lessons from a Yakama Nation case study

Abstract The increasing demand for bioenergy in the United States necessitates detailed case studies of cost and supply to assess its feasibility. We have developed supply curves based on six feedstocks in five counties surrounding the Yakama Nation in central Washington using spatially explicit estimates of supply and transportation cost. The supply curves were used to examine a base case supply for a bioenergy plant, to analyze the effects of land ownership, and examine the impacts of uncertainty in parameters used to determine cost and supply. The results show that existing industries produce the cheapest supply of feedstock as a byproduct of their operations, while supplies harvested specifically for bioenergy are considerably more expensive. Fragmented land ownerships lead to the necessity of cooperation between owners and highlight the importance of a strong anchor supply close to the plant. Lastly, uncertainty in supply and cost parameters leads to larger ranges in available biomass, leading to reluctant investment in large plants.

[1]  S. Polasky,et al.  Environmental, economic, and energetic costs and benefits of biodiesel and ethanol biofuels. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[2]  M. D. Nelson,et al.  Mapping U.S. forest biomass using nationwide forest inventory data and moderate resolution information , 2008 .

[3]  Satish Joshi,et al.  Biomass Supply for Biofuel Production: Estimates for the United States and Canada , 2009, BioResources.

[4]  Avinash Kumar Agarwal,et al.  Performance evaluation of a vegetable oil fuelled compression ignition engine , 2008 .

[5]  G. Morris The environmental costs and benefits of biomass energy use in California , 1997 .

[6]  Donald L. Grebner,et al.  Woody biomass availability for bioethanol conversion in Mississippi , 2009 .

[7]  Bryce J. Stokes,et al.  Biomass as Feedstock for A Bioenergy and Bioproducts Industry: The Technical Feasibility of a Billion-Ton Annual Supply , 2005 .

[8]  Robert D. Perlack,et al.  Feedstock cost analysis of corn stover residues for further processing , 2003 .

[9]  P. Flynn,et al.  Rail vs truck transport of biomass. , 2006, Applied biochemistry and biotechnology.

[10]  Francis M. Epplin,et al.  Economics of a coordinated biorefinery feedstock harvest system: lignocellulosic biomass harvest cost , 2004 .

[11]  Bob Rummer,et al.  Assessing the cost of fuel reduction treatments: a critical review , 2008 .

[12]  Brian Polagye,et al.  An economic analysis of bio-energy options using thinnings from overstocked forests , 2007 .

[13]  Akwasi A. Boateng,et al.  Assessment of straw biomass feedstock resources in the Pacific Northwest. , 2008 .

[14]  P. Tittmann,et al.  Development of a biorefinery optimized biofuel supply curve for the western United States , 2010 .

[15]  B. E. Vaughan,et al.  Ethanol as Fuel: Energy, Carbon Dioxide Balances, and Ecological Footprint , 2005 .

[16]  C. Field,et al.  Greater Transportation Energy and GHG Offsets from Bioelectricity Than Ethanol , 2009, Science.

[17]  Bryce J. Stokes,et al.  A strategic assessment of forest biomass and fuel reduction treatments in western states , 2003 .