The analyst's visual images and the child analyst's trap.
暂无分享,去创建一个
The analyst's experience is different with an adult and a child. One element that constitutes the difference is that the analyst while listening to the adult can become aware of visual images which are created as a continuous commentary to the analysand's material, while the corresponding phenomenon in the child analyst is an emotional commentary. The child can break through the analyst's defenses and catch him in a trap consisting of his own unintegrated, phase-specific emotions and at the same time inhibited ability to introspect. Case material from adult and child analysis is presented to describe these phenomena and to demonstrate how the analyst's visual images in adult analysis and emotional states in child analysis can constitute a central element in the analyst's concept of the analysand.
[1] H. Blum. Countertransference and the Theory of Technique: Discussion , 1986, Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association.
[2] S. Levy. Empathy and Psychoanalytic , 1985 .
[3] R. Tyson. Countertransference Evolution in Theory and Practice , 1986, Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association.
[4] R. Diatkine. The development of object relationships and effects. , 1978, The International journal of psycho-analysis.