Isotropic continuum damage/repair model for alveolar bone remodeling

Several authors have proposed mechanical models to predict long term tooth movement, considering both the tooth and its surrounding bone tissue as isotropic linear elastic materials coupled to either an adaptative elasticity behavior or an update of the elasticity constants with density evolution. However, tooth movements obtained through orthodontic appliances result from a complex biochemical process of bone structure and density adaptation to its mechanical environment, called bone remodeling. This process is far from linear reversible elasticity. It leads to permanent deformations due to biochemical actions. The proposed biomechanical constitutive law, inspired from Doblare and Garcia (2002) [30], is based on a elasto-viscoplastic material coupled with Continuum isotropic Damage Mechanics (Doblare and Garcia (2002) [30] considered only the case of a linear elastic material coupled with damage). The considered damage variable is not actual damage of the tissue but a measure of bone density. The damage evolution law therefore implies a density evolution. It is here formulated as to be used explicitly for alveolar bone, whose remodeling cells are considered to be triggered by the pressure state applied to the bone matrix. A 2D model of a tooth submitted to a tipping movement, is presented. Results show a reliable qualitative prediction of bone density variation around a tooth submitted to orthodontic forces.

[1]  G. Beaupré,et al.  An approach for time‐dependent bone modeling and remodeling—application: A preliminary remodeling simulation , 1990, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[2]  C. Provatidis,et al.  A comparative FEM-study of tooth mobility using isotropic and anisotropic models of the periodontal ligament. Finite Element Method. , 2000, Medical engineering & physics.

[3]  Martin Geiger,et al.  Numerical experiments on long-time orthodontic tooth movement. , 2002, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[4]  R. Masella,et al.  Current concepts in the biology of orthodontic tooth movement. , 2006, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[5]  W. Roberts Bone physiology of tooth movement, ankylosis, and osseointegration , 2000 .

[6]  Alan W Eberhardt,et al.  A nonlinear finite element analysis of the periodontal ligament under orthodontic tooth loading. , 2003, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[7]  Vinod Krishnan,et al.  Cellular, molecular, and tissue-level reactions to orthodontic force. , 2006, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[8]  S. Cowin,et al.  Bone remodeling I: theory of adaptive elasticity , 1976 .

[9]  Stephen C Cowin,et al.  Tissue growth and remodeling. , 2004, Annual review of biomedical engineering.

[10]  G S Beaupré,et al.  An approach for time‐dependent bone modeling and remodeling—theoretical development , 1990, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[11]  J. C. Simo,et al.  Adaptive bone remodeling incorporating simultaneous density and anisotropy considerations. , 1997, Journal of biomechanics.

[12]  Sarandeep S. Huja,et al.  Bone modeling: biomechanics, molecular mechanisms, and clinical perspectives , 2004 .

[13]  G. Beaupré,et al.  The influence of bone volume fraction and ash fraction on bone strength and modulus. , 2001, Bone.

[14]  B Melsen,et al.  Tissue reaction to orthodontic tooth movement--a new paradigm. , 2001, European journal of orthodontics.

[15]  B. Melsen,et al.  The Finite Element Method: a Tool to Study Orthodontic Tooth Movement , 2005, Journal of dental research.

[16]  Carlalberta Verna,et al.  Microcracks in the alveolar bone following orthodontic tooth movement: a morphological and morphometric study. , 2004, European journal of orthodontics.

[17]  J. Lemaître,et al.  Engineering Damage Mechanics: Ductile, Creep, Fatigue and Brittle Failures , 2005 .

[18]  Christoph Bourauel,et al.  Simulation of orthodontic tooth movements , 1999, Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics / Fortschritte der Kieferorthopädie.

[19]  L Keilig,et al.  Experimental-numerical analysis of minipig's multi-rooted teeth. , 2007, Journal of biomechanics.

[20]  Manuel Doblaré,et al.  Bone remodelling simulation: a tool for implant design , 2002 .

[21]  H. Fukui,et al.  A numerical simulation of tooth movement produced by molar uprighting spring. , 2007, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[22]  Christoph Bourauel,et al.  Application of Bone Remodeling Theories in the Simulation of Orthodontic Tooth Movements , 2000, Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics / Fortschritte der Kieferorthopädie.

[23]  J. Wolff Das Gesetz der Transformation der Knochen , 1893 .

[24]  J. M. Garcı́a,et al.  Anisotropic bone remodelling model based on a continuum damage-repair theory. , 2002, Journal of biomechanics.

[25]  Martin Rb Porosity and specific surface of bone. , 1984 .

[26]  Jean-Philippe Ponthot,et al.  Unified stress update algorithms for the numerical simulation of large deformation elasto-plastic and elasto-viscoplastic processes , 2002 .