Failure of current public educational campaigns to impact on the initial response of patients with possible heart attack

Abstract

[1]  C. Aroney,et al.  Use of an accelerated chest pain assessment protocol in patients at intermediate risk of adverse cardiac events , 2003, The Medical journal of Australia.

[2]  P. Touboul,et al.  Primary angioplasty versus prehospital fibrinolysis in acute myocardial infarction: a randomised study , 2002, The Lancet.

[3]  R. Norris,et al.  Myocardial infarction: is evidence-based medicine the best? , 2002, The Lancet.

[4]  A. Gitt,et al.  Qualitätssicherung beim akuten Myokardinfarkt , 2001, Medizinische Klinik.

[5]  T. Heer,et al.  [Quality assurance in acute myocardial infarct]. , 2001, Medizinische Klinik.

[6]  C. Morrison,et al.  Delay in calling for help during myocardial infarction: reasons for the delay and subsequent pattern of accessing care , 2000, Heart.

[7]  H A Feldman,et al.  Effect of a community intervention on patient delay and emergency medical service use in acute coronary heart disease: The Rapid Early Action for Coronary Treatment (REACT) Trial. , 2000, JAMA.

[8]  D. Moser,et al.  Treatment-seeking behavior for acute myocardial infarction symptoms in North America and Australia. , 2000, Heart & lung : the journal of critical care.

[9]  J. Birkhead,et al.  Trends in the provision of thrombolytic treatment between 1993 and 1997 , 1999, Heart.

[10]  JohnRawles.  Extended Mortality Benefit of Early Postinfarction Reperfusion , 1998 .

[11]  R. Schiele,et al.  The 60 Minutes Myocardial Infarction Project. Characteristics on admission and clinical outcome in patients with reinfarction compared to patients with a first infarction. , 1998, European heart journal.

[12]  J. Herlitz,et al.  Factors associated with pre‐hospital and in‐hospital delay time in acute myocardial infarction: a 6‐year experience , 1998, Journal of internal medicine.

[13]  H. Suryapranata,et al.  Clinical presentation and outcome of patients with early, intermediate and late reperfusion therapy by primary coronary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction. , 1998, European heart journal.

[14]  J. Ornato,et al.  The Physician's Role in Minimizing Prehospital Delay in Patients at High Risk for Acute Myocardial Infarction: Recommendations from the National Heart Attack Alert Program , 1997, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[15]  R. Luepker,et al.  An evaluation of the results of media and educational campaigns designed to shorten the time taken by patients with acute myocardial infarction to decide to go to hospital. , 1996, Heart.

[16]  F Van de Werf,et al.  Time from symptom onset to treatment and outcomes after thrombolytic therapy. GUSTO-1 Investigators. , 1996, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[17]  F. Balestra,et al.  Epidemiology of avoidable delay in the care of patients with acute myocardial infarction in Italy. A GISSI-generated study. GISSI--Avoidable Delay Study Group. , 1995, Archives of internal medicine.

[18]  P. Thompson,et al.  Delays preceding admission to hospital and treatment with thrombolytic agents of patients with possible heart attack. , 1993, Australian and New Zealand journal of medicine.

[19]  P. Thompson,et al.  Impact of a national educational campaign to reduce patient delay in possible heart attack. , 1993, Australian and New Zealand journal of medicine.

[20]  J. Herlitz,et al.  Delay time between onset of myocardial infarction and start of thrombolysis in relation to prognosis. , 1993, Cardiology.

[21]  R. Luepker,et al.  Reaction to a media campaign focusing on delay in acute myocardial infarction. , 1991, Heart & lung : the journal of critical care.

[22]  J. Herlitz,et al.  Components of delay time in suspected acute myocardial infarction with particular emphasis on patient delay , 1990, Journal of internal medicine.