Stated preference and choice models applied to recreation research : a review

Abstract This article discusses the use and usefulness of stated preference and choice models in recreation/leisure research. Stated preference and choice models require one to design decision experiments to study recreational and leisure decisions made in hypothetical or simulated markets. Historically, such experiments were uncommon in recreation and leisure research; therefore we pay particular attention to comparisons of the stated preference modeling approaches with modeling approaches based on observations of choices made in real markets, such as the analysis of discrete choices using conditional and nested multinomial logit models. The conceptual and theoretical bases of stated preference and choice models are discussed; and procedures for developing such models, including different design strategies, are outlined. Potential uses of these models in recreation research are illustrated with reference to several recent empirical applications.

[1]  Philippe Cattin,et al.  Commercial Use of Conjoint Analysis: An Update , 1989 .

[2]  Richard R. Batsell,et al.  A Monté Carlo Comparison of Estimators for the Multinomial Logit Model , 1989 .

[3]  H. Timmermans,et al.  The Spatial Transferability of a Decompositional Multiattribute Preference Model , 1988 .

[4]  Jordan J. Louviere,et al.  Analyzing Decision Making: Metric Conjoint Analysis , 1988 .

[5]  H. Timmermans,et al.  Choice model specification, substitution and spatial structure effects: A simulation experiment , 1987 .

[6]  D. Fesenmaier,et al.  Physical and Social Conditions Affecting Recreation Site Preferences , 1985 .

[7]  Hjp Harry Timmermans,et al.  Specification of Individual Residential Utility Functions: A Comparative Analysis of Three Measurement Procedures , 1984 .

[8]  Daniel J. Stynes,et al.  A Review of Logit Models with Implications for Modeling Recreation Choices. , 1984 .

[9]  Harry Timmermans,et al.  Decompositional Multiattribute Preference Models in Spatial Choice Analysis: A Review of Some Recent Developments , 1984 .

[10]  H. Timmermans,et al.  Decisionmaking between Multiattribute Choice Alternatives: A Model of Spatial Shopping-Behaviour Using Conjoint Measurements , 1984 .

[11]  D. Fesenmaier,et al.  Modelling recreation choice: A case study of management alternatives in Chicago , 1984 .

[12]  Jordan J. Louviere,et al.  Design and Analysis of Simulated Consumer Choice or Allocation Experiments: An Approach Based on Aggregate Data , 1983 .

[13]  Jordan J. Louviere,et al.  External validity tests of laboratory studies of information integration , 1983 .

[14]  Vijay Mahajan,et al.  A Conjoint Model for Measuring Self- and Cross-Price/Demand Relationships , 1982 .

[15]  Lee G. Cooper,et al.  Technical Note---Simplified Estimation Procedures for MCI Models , 1982 .

[16]  H. Timmermans Consumer choice of shopping centre: an information integration approach , 1982 .

[17]  Naresh K. Malhotra,et al.  Structural Reliability and Stability of Nonmetric Conjoint Analysis , 1982 .

[18]  Robert J. Meyer,et al.  Context-Induced Parameter Instability in a Disaggregate-Stochastic Model of Store Choice , 1982 .

[19]  D. Wittink,et al.  Commercial Use of Conjoint Analysis: A Survey , 1982 .

[20]  Jordan J. Louviere,et al.  A composite attitude-behavior model of traveler decision making , 1981 .

[21]  Hjp Harry Timmermans,et al.  Multiattribute Shopping Models and Ridge Regression Analysis , 1981 .

[22]  D. Hensher,et al.  Intra metropolitan transferability of mode choice models , 1980 .

[23]  R. Duncan Luce,et al.  Individual Choice Behavior: A Theoretical Analysis , 1979 .

[24]  D. Hensher,et al.  Behavioural intentions as predictors of very specific behaviour , 1979 .

[25]  H. J. Schuler A DISAGGREGATE STORE-CHOICE MODEL OF SPATIAL DECISION-MAKING , 1979 .

[26]  Roger J. Best,et al.  Conjoint Measurement: Temporal Stability and Structural Reliability , 1979 .

[27]  D. Kirshner,et al.  Specification, transferability and the effect of data outliers in modeling the choice of mode in urban travel , 1978 .

[28]  Paul E. Green,et al.  Additive Decomposition of Perceptions Data Via Conjoint Analysis , 1978 .

[29]  Paul E. Green,et al.  Robustness of Conjoint Analysis: Some Monté Carlo Results , 1978 .

[30]  V. Srinivasan,et al.  A Consumer Preference Approach to the Planning of Rural Primary Health-Care Facilities , 1976, Oper. Res..

[31]  Carol A. Scott The Effects of Trial and Incentives on Repeat Purchase Behavior , 1976 .

[32]  Lee G. Cooper,et al.  Parameter Estimation for a Multiplicative Competitive Interaction Model—Least Squares Approach , 1974 .

[33]  Yoram Wind,et al.  Subjective evaluation models and conjoint measurement , 1972 .

[34]  T. B. Knopp Environmental Determinants of Recreation Behavior , 1972 .

[35]  R. Luce,et al.  Individual Choice Behavior: A Theoretical Analysis. , 1960 .

[36]  Hjp Harry Timmermans,et al.  Multipurpose trips and individual choice behaviour : an analysis using experimental design data , 1988 .

[37]  Hjp Harry Timmermans,et al.  A context-sensitive model of spatial choice behaviour , 1988 .

[38]  Jordan J. Louviere,et al.  Analyzing Decision Making , 1988 .

[39]  H. Timmermans Hybrid and non-hybrid evaluation models for predicting outdoor recreation behavior : a test of predictive ability , 1987 .

[40]  Jordan J. Louviere,et al.  A Conjoint Model For Analyzing New Product Positions in a Differentiated Market With Price Competition , 1986 .

[41]  Hjp Harry Timmermans,et al.  The predictive ability of alternative decision rules in decompositional multiattribute preference models , 1984 .

[42]  Jordan J. Louviere,et al.  Hierarchical Information Integration: a New Method For the Design and Analysis of Complex Multlattribute Judgment Problems , 1984 .

[43]  Jordan J. Louviere,et al.  Using discrete choice experiments and multinomial logit choice models to forecast trial in a competitive retail environment: A fast food restaurant illustration. , 1984 .

[44]  S. Lieber,et al.  Attributes of Chicago trail areas , 1983 .

[45]  Jordan J. Louviere,et al.  DESIGN AND ANALYSIS OF SIMULATED CHOICE OR ALLOCATION EXPERIMENTS IN TRAVEL CHOICE MODELING , 1982 .

[46]  W. Hyman,et al.  WISCONSIN WORK MODE-CHOICE MODELS BASED ON FUNCTIONAL MEASUREMENT AND DISAGGREGATE BEHAVIORAL DATA , 1982 .

[47]  Jordan J. Louviere,et al.  LABORATORY-SIMULATION VERSUS REVEALED-PREFERENCE METHODS FOR ESTIMATING TRAVEL DEMAND MODELS , 1981 .

[48]  Jordan J. Louviere,et al.  USING FUNCTIONAL MEASUREMENT TO IDENTIFY THE FORM OF UTILITY FUNCTIONS IN TRAVEL DEMAND MODELS , 1978 .

[49]  Jordan J. Louviere,et al.  FUNCTIONAL ANALYSIS OF MODE CHOICE , 1978 .

[50]  Leigh McAlister,et al.  Choosing Multiple Items From A Product Class , 1978 .

[51]  Moshe Ben-Akiva,et al.  TRANSFERABILITY AND UPDATING OF DISAGGREGATE TRAVEL DEMAND MODELS , 1976 .

[52]  H. Theil Principles of econometrics , 1971 .