A RESTful proxy and data model for linked sensor data

Abstract The vision of a Digital Earth calls for more dynamic information systems, new sources of information, and stronger capabilities for their integration. Sensor networks have been identified as a major information source for the Digital Earth, while Semantic Web technologies have been proposed to facilitate integration. So far, sensor data are stored and published using the Observations & Measurements standard of the Open Geospatial Consortium (OGC) as data model. With the advent of Volunteered Geographic Information and the Semantic Sensor Web, work on an ontological model gained importance within Sensor Web Enablement (SWE). In contrast to data models, an ontological approach abstracts from implementation details by focusing on modeling the physical world from the perspective of a particular domain. Ontologies restrict the interpretation of vocabularies toward their intended meaning. The ongoing paradigm shift to Linked Sensor Data complements this attempt. Two questions have to be addressed: (1) how to refer to changing and frequently updated data sets using Uniform Resource Identifiers, and (2) how to establish meaningful links between those data sets, that is, observations, sensors, features of interest, and observed properties? In this paper, we present a Linked Data model and a RESTful proxy for OGC's Sensor Observation Service to improve integration and inter-linkage of observation data for the Digital Earth.

[1]  Roy Fielding,et al.  Architectural Styles and the Design of Network-based Software Architectures"; Doctoral dissertation , 2000 .

[2]  Amit P. Sheth,et al.  Linked sensor data , 2010, 2010 International Symposium on Collaborative Technologies and Systems.

[3]  Deborah L. McGuinness,et al.  When owl: sameAs Isn't the Same: An Analysis of Identity in Linked Data , 2010, SEMWEB.

[4]  S. Lehar The World in Your Head : A Gestalt View of the Mechanism of Conscious Experience , 2003 .

[5]  Amit P. Sheth,et al.  Semantic Sensor Web , 2008, IEEE Internet Computing.

[6]  Carsten Keßler,et al.  Bottom-Up Gazetteers: Learning from the Implicit Semantics of Geotags , 2009, GeoS.

[7]  Krzysztof Janowicz,et al.  Linking Sensor Data - Why, to What, and How? , 2010, SSN.

[8]  Michael F. Goodchild,et al.  Please Scroll down for Article International Journal of Digital Earth Crowdsourcing Geographic Information for Disaster Response: a Research Frontier Crowdsourcing Geographic Information for Disaster Response: a Research Frontier , 2022 .

[9]  Gerhard Navratil Research trends in geographic information science , 2009 .

[10]  Patrick J. Hayes,et al.  When owl: sameAs isn't the Same: An Analysis of Identity Links on the Semantic Web , 2010, LDOW.

[11]  Terence L. van Zyl,et al.  The Sensor Web: systems of sensor systems , 2009, Int. J. Digit. Earth.

[12]  Florian Probst,et al.  Giving Meaning to GI Web Service Descriptions , 2004, WSMAI.

[13]  J. A. Glennona Crowdsourcing geographic information for disaster response: a research , 2010 .

[14]  Scott Bell,et al.  Introduction to Scientific Research Methods in Geography , 2007 .

[15]  Krzysztof Janowicz,et al.  The role of space and time for knowledge organization on the Semantic Web , 2010, Semantic Web.

[16]  Christoph Stasch,et al.  New Generation Sensor Web Enablement , 2011, Sensors.

[17]  Christoph Stasch,et al.  Development of sensor web applications with open source software , 2009 .

[18]  Sven Schade,et al.  Linked Data in SDI or How GML is not about Trees , 2010 .

[19]  Óscar Corcho,et al.  Linked Stream Data: A Position Paper , 2009, SSN.

[20]  David M. Mark,et al.  Next-Generation Digital Earth: A position paper from the Vespucci Initiative for the Advancement of Geographic Information Science , 2008, Int. J. Spatial Data Infrastructures Res..

[21]  Daniel Nüst,et al.  Semantically-Enabled Sensor Plug & Play for the Sensor Web , 2011, Sensors.

[22]  Christoph Stasch,et al.  Semantic Challenges for Sensor Plug and Play , 2009, W2GIS.

[23]  John Davidson,et al.  Ogc® sensor web enablement:overview and high level achhitecture. , 2007, 2007 IEEE Autotestcon.

[24]  Christoph Stasch,et al.  Semantic Enablement for Spatial Data Infrastructures , 2010, Trans. GIS.

[25]  Daniel R. Montello,et al.  Spatial Information Theory A Theoretical Basis for GIS , 1995, Lecture Notes in Computer Science.

[26]  Michael Compton,et al.  The Semantic Sensor Network Ontology: A Generic Language to Describe Sensor Assets , 2009 .

[27]  J Harlan,et al.  Research and Theory in Advancing Spatial Data Infrastructure Concepts , 2007 .

[28]  Krzysztof Janowicz,et al.  The Stimulus-Sensor-Observation Ontology Design Pattern and its Integration into the Semantic Sensor Network Ontology , 2010, SSN.

[29]  Schade Sven Ontology-Driven Translation of Geospatial Data , 2010 .

[30]  Tim Berners-Lee,et al.  Linked Data - The Story So Far , 2009, Int. J. Semantic Web Inf. Syst..

[31]  Werner Kuhn,et al.  Semantic reference systems , 2003, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[32]  Amit P. Sheth,et al.  A Survey of the Semantic Specification of Sensors , 2009, SSN.

[33]  David De Roure,et al.  Linked Sensor Data: RESTfully serving RDF and GML , 2009, SSN.

[34]  Michael F. Goodchild,et al.  Where's Downtown?: Behavioral Methods for Determining Referents of Vague Spatial Queries , 2003 .

[35]  Sven Schade,et al.  Digital Earth's Nervous System for crisis events: real-time Sensor Web Enablement of Volunteered Geographic Information , 2010, Int. J. Digit. Earth.

[36]  Sam Ruby,et al.  RESTful Web Services , 2007 .

[37]  Danh Le Phuoc,et al.  Linked Open Data in Sensor Data Mashups, , 2009, SSN.

[38]  E. Prud hommeaux,et al.  SPARQL query language for RDF , 2011 .

[39]  A. Gore The Digital Earth , 2012 .

[40]  Vlad Trifa,et al.  Towards the Web of Things: Web Mashups for Embedded Devices , 2009 .

[41]  Amit P. Sheth,et al.  Provenance Aware Linked Sensor Data , 2010 .

[42]  Lauren Wood 技術解説 IEEE Internet Computing , 1999 .

[43]  David M. Mark,et al.  Toward a Theoretical Framework for Geographic Entity Types , 1993, COSIT.

[44]  Krzysztof Janowicz,et al.  Grounding Geographic Categories in the Meaningful Environment , 2009, COSIT.

[45]  Frank van Harmelen,et al.  Finding the Achilles Heel of the Web of Data: Using Network Analysis for Link-Recommendation , 2010, SEMWEB.

[46]  Mark Gahegan,et al.  Experiments to Examine the Situated Nature of Geoscientific Concepts , 2007, Spatial Cogn. Comput..

[47]  A. Gore The digital earth : Understanding our planet in the 21st century , 1998 .

[48]  Tim Berners-Lee,et al.  Linked data , 2020, Semantic Web for the Working Ontologist.

[49]  M. Goodchild Citizens as sensors: the world of volunteered geography , 2007 .

[50]  Nicola Guarino,et al.  Formal Ontology and Information Systems , 1998 .

[51]  Sven Schade,et al.  Ontology-driven translation of geospatial data , 2010 .

[52]  Christoph Stasch,et al.  Towards meaningful URIs for linked sensor data , 2010 .

[53]  Stefano Nativi,et al.  RESTful implementation of geospatial services for Earth and Space Science applications , 2009, Int. J. Digit. Earth.

[54]  Amit P. Sheth,et al.  Linked Data Is Merely More Data , 2010, AAAI Spring Symposium: Linked Data Meets Artificial Intelligence.

[55]  Barry Smith,et al.  Do Mountains Exist? Towards an Ontology of Landforms , 2003 .