Residency and movement patterns of yellowfin bream (Acanthopagrus australis) released at natural and artificial reef sites

The present study investigated the long-term (>2 years) site fidelity, residency and movement patterns of Acanthopagrus australis (Sparidae) at artificial (AR) and natural reef (NR) sites. Acoustic telemetry was used to assess movement patterns of 39 fish released at NR and AR locations and other habitat types within the study area. Detection periods ranged from 1 day to a maximum of 912 days, with 36% of fish detected by the array for >1 year and a further 7% detected for >2 years. Results indicate that tagged fish tended to remain associated with the release site; however, AR fish were detected for considerably longer periods with greater numbers of fish identified as resident within the AR system. AR-released fish were also identified more frequently across the entire array, with the majority (90%) of detections between receiver stations located within the AR system. Results were affected by short detection periods ( 200km were also detected, but there was no obvious trend with release location. The results of the present study indicate interactions between existing and introduced artificial habitat are more complex than a ‘draw-down’ effect and provide further evidence that AR systems provide suitable habitat for a variety of species, as well as further support for the use of AR systems in fisheries enhancement initiatives. The results also have important implications for understanding the effect of AR systems and indicate that the size of the reef system may be an important factor in controlling for levels of fishing-related mortality.

[1]  S. Jennings,et al.  Human effects on ecological connectivity in aquatic ecosystems: Integrating scientific approaches to support management and mitigation. , 2015, The Science of the total environment.

[2]  James A. Smith,et al.  Fish attraction to artificial reefs not always harmful: a simulation study , 2015, Ecology and evolution.

[3]  Matthew D. Taylor,et al.  Fine-scale movements, site fidelity and habitat use of an estuarine dependent sparid , 2015, Environmental Biology of Fishes.

[4]  P. Brehmer,et al.  Implementation of artificial habitats: Inside or outside the marine protected areas? Insights from a mathematical approach , 2015 .

[5]  M. Steele,et al.  Fish growth, reproduction, and tissue production on artificial reefs relative to natural reefs , 2014 .

[6]  Jonathan P. Williams,et al.  Oil platforms off California are among the most productive marine fish habitats globally , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[7]  M. Harmelin-Vivien,et al.  Artificial reefs do increase secondary biomass production: mechanisms evidenced by stable isotopes , 2014 .

[8]  S. Szedlmayer,et al.  Fine‐Scale Movements and Home Ranges of Red Snapper around Artificial Reefs in the Northern Gulf of Mexico , 2014 .

[9]  B. Koeck,et al.  Functional differences between fish communities on artificial and natural reefs: a case study along the French Catalan coast , 2014 .

[10]  S. Vagle,et al.  A review of detection range testing in aquatic passive acoustic telemetry studies , 2014, Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries.

[11]  I. Suthers,et al.  Response of fish communities to the deployment of estuarine artificial reefs for fisheries enhancement , 2014 .

[12]  C. A. Gray,et al.  Interactive Drivers of Activity in a Free-Ranging Estuarine Predator , 2013, PloS one.

[13]  Josep Alós,et al.  Contrasting Fish Behavior in Artificial Seascapes with Implications for Resources Conservation , 2013, PloS one.

[14]  J. H. Cowan,et al.  Effects of an Inshore Artificial Reef on the Trophic Dynamics of Three Species of Estuarine Fish , 2013 .

[15]  D. Abecasis,et al.  Residency, movements and habitat use of adult white seabream (Diplodus sargus) between natural and artificial reefs , 2013 .

[16]  Matthew D. Taylor,et al.  Rain reverses diel activity rhythms in an estuarine teleost , 2013, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[17]  Ross G. Dwyer,et al.  V-Track: software for analysing and visualising animal movement from acoustic telemetry detections , 2012 .

[18]  Fiona J. Valesini,et al.  Potential effects of climate change on Australian estuaries and fish utilising estuaries: a review , 2011 .

[19]  Fabio Badalamenti,et al.  Movement pattern of white seabream, Diplodus sargus (L., 1758) (Osteichthyes, Sparidae) acoustically tracked in an artificial reef area , 2011 .

[20]  K Hiscock,et al.  Colonization of an artificial reef in south-west England—ex-HMS ‘Scylla’ , 2010, Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom.

[21]  F. Leitão,et al.  Fish assemblages and rapid colonization after enlargement of an artificial reef off the Algarve coast (Southern Portugal) , 2008 .

[22]  M. Chapman,et al.  Fish assemblages associated with urban structures and natural reefs in Sydney, Australia , 2008 .

[23]  I. Zalmon,et al.  Epibenthic colonization on an artificial reef in a stressed environment off the north coast of the Rio de Janeiro State, Brazil , 2008 .

[24]  B. Clynick.  Characteristics of an urban fish assemblage: distribution of fish associated with coastal marinas. , 2008, Marine environmental research.

[25]  William Seaman,et al.  Artificial habitats and the restoration of degraded marine ecosystems and fisheries , 2007, Hydrobiologia.

[26]  N Shashar,et al.  Can artificial reefs mimic natural reef communities? The roles of structural features and age. , 2006, Marine environmental research.

[27]  Richard C. Thompson,et al.  An ecological perspective on the deployment and design of low-crested and other hard coastal defence structures , 2005 .

[28]  Y. Benayahu,et al.  Recruitment of benthic organisms onto a planned artificial reef: shifts in community structure one decade post-deployment. , 2005, Marine environmental research.

[29]  S. Szedlmayer,et al.  Long-Term Residence of Red Snapper on Artificial Reefs in the Northeastern Gulf of Mexico , 2005 .

[30]  Dominique Pelletier,et al.  Marine protected areas and artificial reefs: A review of the interactions between management and scientific studies , 2004 .

[31]  Jonathan H. Grabowski,et al.  Estimating enhancement of fish production by offshore artificial reefs: uncertainty exhibited by divergent scenarios , 2003 .

[32]  G. Rilov,et al.  Fish assemblage on natural versus vertical artificial reefs: the rehabilitation perspective , 2000 .

[33]  T. Pitcher,et al.  Petrarch’s Principle: how protected human-made reefs can help the reconstruction of fisheries and marine ecosystems , 2000 .

[34]  S. Bortone.  Resolving the Attraction-Production Dilemma in Artificial Reef Research: Some Yeas and Nays , 1998 .

[35]  R. Williams,et al.  Recruitment of juvenile marine fishes to seagrass habitat in a temperature Australian estuary , 1998 .

[36]  David Whitmarsh,et al.  Artificial reefs and fisheries exploitation: a review of the ‘attraction versus production’ debate, the influence of design and its significance for policy , 1997 .

[37]  Mark H. Carr,et al.  Artificial Reefs: The Importance of Comparisons with Natural Reefs , 1997 .

[38]  Geoff Jones,et al.  Do Artificial Reefs Increase Regional Fish Production? A Review of Existing Data , 1997 .

[39]  R. Hobbs.  The role of corridors in conservation: Solution or bandwagon? , 1992, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[40]  R. Hobbs,et al.  Biological Consequences of Ecosystem Fragmentation: A Review , 1991 .

[41]  B. R. Pollock,et al.  Movements and migrations of yellowfin bream, Acanthopagrus australis (Günther), in Moreton Bay, Queensland as determined by tag recoveries , 1982 .

[42]  N. Payne,et al.  Feels like home: homing of mature large‐bodied fish following translocation from a power‐station canal , 2017 .

[43]  I. Suthers,et al.  Colonization and community development of fish assemblages associated with estuarine artificial reefs , 2011 .

[44]  J. Montgomery,et al.  Habitat complexity and predation risk determine juvenile snapper (Pagrus auratus) and goatfish (Upeneichthys lineatus) behaviour and distribution , 2007 .

[45]  C. Osenberg,et al.  A quantitative framework to evaluate the attraction-production controversy , 2002 .

[46]  C. A. Gray,et al.  Intra- and inter-estuary differences in assemblages of fishes associated with shallow seagrass and bare sand , 1996 .