Securing Liberty in the Face of Terror: Reflections from Criminal Justice

Post-9/11 the equilibrium between security and liberty has been subject to intense political and philosophical interrogation. The metaphor of balance, although perilous, is so pervasive as to demand scrutiny of what lies in the scales, what tips them, and in whose interest. Though international and constitutional lawyers have dominated the debate about balance, the experience of criminal justice suggests that articulating a principled approach provides greater prospects of protecting rights against unwarranted erosion. This more modest approach imposes structural and procedural safeguards through the twin engines of judicial oversight and unremitting defence of due process. In this way it may be possible to enhance collective security against terrorism without diminishing individual security against the state.

[1]  V. Lowe.  Shorter Articles, Comments, and Notes: ‘Clear and Present Danger’: Responses to Terrorism , 2005, International and Comparative Law Quarterly.

[2]  J. Huysmans.  Minding Exceptions: The Politics of Insecurity and Liberal Democracy , 2004 .

[3]  L. H. Tribe,et al.  The Anti-Emergency Constitution , 2004 .

[4]  M. Innes.  Reinventing Tradition? , 2004 .

[5]  Lucia Zedner,et al.  Too much security , 2003 .

[6]  J. Waldron,et al.  Security and Liberty: The Image of Balance* , 2003 .

[7]  Lucia Zedner,et al.  The concept of security: an agenda for comparative analysis , 2003, Legal Studies.

[8]  O. Gross,et al.  Chaos and Rules: Should Responses to Violent Crises Always Be Constitutional? , 2003 .

[9]  H. Fenwick.  The Anti-Terrorism, Crime and Security Act 2001: A Proportionate Response to 11 September? , 2002 .

[10]  L. Tribe,et al.  Waging War, Deciding Guilt: Trying the Military Tribunals , 2002 .

[11]  P. Heymann.  Civil Liberties and Human Rights in the Aftermath of September 11 , 2002 .

[12]  N. Feldman.  Choices of Law, Choices of War , 2002 .

[13]  R. Hood,et al.  Sex Offenders Emerging from Long-Term Imprisonment. A Study of Their Long-term Reconviction Rates and of Parole Board Members' Judgements of Their Risk , 2002 .

[14]  William J. Stuntz.  Local Policing After the Terror , 2002 .

[15]  Oren Gross,et al.  From Discretion to Scrutiny: Revisiting the Application of the Margin of Appreciation Doctrine in the Context of Article 15 of the European Convention on Human Rights , 2001 .

[16]  C. Gearty.  Terrorism and human rights: a case study in impending legal realities , 1999, Legal Studies.

[17]  Ian Loader,et al.  Consumer Culture and the Commodification of Policing and Security , 1999 .

[18]  R. Duff.  Penal Communications: Recent Work in the Philosophy of Punishment , 1996, Crime and Justice.

[19]  P. Thomas,et al.  The Prevention of Terrorism Act: Normalising the Politics of Repression , 1983 .

[20]  R. Brownsword,et al.  THE DANGEROUSNESS DEBATE AFTER THE FLOUD REPORT , 1982 .

[21]  B. Ackerman.  The Emergency Constitution , 2004 .

[22]  Saul Smilansky.  The Time to Punish , 1994 .

[23]  Russell Christopher,et al.  Time and punishment , 1992 .