Evaluation of Airspace Complexity and Dynamic Density Metrics Derived from Operational Data

Mental workload experienced by air traffic controllers cannot be measured directly but may be inferred from observable performance or task load imposed on them by volume and complexity of traffic. This research evaluated several measures used to quantify the aforementioned variables. Data were obtained from Indianapolis (ZID) and Kansas City (ZKC) centers and processed by a modified objective activity and task load assessment program, POWER. We compared sectors with different characteristics to measures of pilot-controller communications and to sector complexity metrics, derived from the POWER output. Results from ZKC data were evaluated against subjective workload ratings. The ZID results were consistent with the different characteristics of the selected sectors. Dynamic density correlated with subjective workload estimates and controller transmission durations, known to be a workload indicator. This research demonstrated the viability of extracting metrics relevant to controller task load from operational data and the practicability of implementing additional algorithm st o the POWER program for derivation of new metrics.

[1]  R M Rose,et al.  Objective workload and behavioural response in airport radar control rooms. , 1978, Ergonomics.

[2]  I. Scheffler.  Science And Subjectivity , 1967 .

[3]  Kip Smith,et al.  An Index of Dynamic Density , 1998, Hum. Factors.

[4]  Robert T. Hennessy.  Practical Human Performance Testing and Evaluation , 1990 .

[5]  W. Knecht,et al.  A Dynamic Conflict Probe and Index of Collision Risk , 1996 .

[6]  Douglas H. Porterfield.  Evaluating Controller Communication Time As a Measure of Workload , 1997 .

[7]  Christopher D. Wickens,et al.  An introduction to human factors engineering , 1997 .

[8]  Peter Kosso,et al.  Science and Objectivity , 1989 .

[9]  Daniel G. Morrow,et al.  Mixed-Media Communication on the Flight Deck: A Comparison of Voice, Data Link, and Mixed ATC Environments , 1998 .

[10]  W. Wierwille,et al.  A Comparison of Rating Scale, Secondary-Task, Physiological, and Primary-Task Workload Estimation Techniques in a Simulated Flight Task Emphasizing Communications Load , 1983, Human factors.

[11]  Mark H. Chignell,et al.  Mental workload dynamics in adaptive interface design , 1988, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern..

[12]  Esa M. Rantanen,et al.  Hierarchical Conflict Detection in Air Traffic Control , 2005 .

[13]  Esa M. Rantanen,et al.  Time-Based Modeling of Human Performance , 2005 .

[14]  Koen de Jong,et al.  Medium term conflict detection in EATCHIP phase III , 1997, 16th DASC. AIAA/IEEE Digital Avionics Systems Conference. Reflections to the Future. Proceedings.

[15]  V. A. M. Hunt,et al.  The Future of Air Traffic Control , 1961, The Journal of the Royal Aeronautical Society.

[16]  Paul Milgram,et al.  Combining Time and Intensity Effects in Assessing Operator Information-Processing Load , 1997, Hum. Factors.

[17]  Nancy G. Leveson,et al.  ELIMINATING HAZARDS FROM A MEDIUM TERM CONFLICT DETECTION TOOL , 2003 .

[18]  James K. Kuchar,et al.  A review of conflict detection and resolution modeling methods , 2000, IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst..

[19]  K. S. Lindsay,et al.  Assessment of field trials, algorithmic performance, and benefits of the User Request Evaluation Tool (URET) conflict probe , 1997, 16th DASC. AIAA/IEEE Digital Avionics Systems Conference. Reflections to the Future. Proceedings.

[20]  David Meister.  Basic premises and principles of human factors measurement , 2001 .

[21]  Daniel G. Morrow,et al.  Analysis of Problems in Routine Controller-Pilot Communication , 1993 .

[22]  D. J. Brudnicki,et al.  USER REQUEST EVALUATION TOOL (URET) CONFLICT PROBE PERFORMANCE AND BENEFITS ASSESSMENT , 2004 .

[23]  I V Laudeman,et al.  Quantitative measurement of observed workload in the analysis of aircrew performance. , 1995, The International journal of aviation psychology.

[24]  N. Meshkati,et al.  Toward development of a cohesive model of workload , 1988 .

[25]  William S. Pawlak,et al.  A FRAMEWORK FOR THE EVALUATION OF AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL COMPLEXITY , 1996 .

[26]  V. David Hopkin.  Human Factors In Air Traffic Control , 1995 .

[27]  S. Magyarits,et al.  Dynamic density: measuring and predicting sector complexity [ATC] , 2002, Proceedings. The 21st Digital Avionics Systems Conference.