Delayed suppression shapes disparity selective responses in monkey V1.

The stereo correspondence problem poses a challenge to visual neurons because localized receptive fields potentially cause false responses. Neurons in the primary visual cortex (V1) partially resolve this problem by combining excitatory and suppressive responses to encode binocular disparity. We explored the time course of this combination in awake, monkey V1 neurons using subspace mapping of receptive fields. The stimulus was a binocular noise pattern constructed from discrete spatial frequency components. We forward correlated the firing of the V1 neuron with the occurrence of binocular presentations of each spatial frequency component. The forward correlation yielded a complete set of response time courses to every combination of spatial frequency and interocular phase difference. Some combinations produced suppressive responses. Typically, if an interocular phase difference for a given spatial frequency produced strong excitation, we saw suppression in response to the opposite interocular phase difference at lower spatial frequencies. The suppression was delayed relative to the excitation, with a median difference in latency of 7 ms. We found that the suppressive mechanism explains a well-known mismatch of monocular and binocular signals. The suppressive components increased power at low spatial frequencies in disparity tuning, whereas they reduced the monocular response to low spatial frequencies. This long-recognized mismatch of binocular and monocular signals reflects a suppressive mechanism that helps reduce the response to false matches.

[1]  D Marr,et al.  A computational theory of human stereo vision. , 1979, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[2]  J. P. Jones,et al.  The two-dimensional spatial structure of simple receptive fields in cat striate cortex. , 1987, Journal of neurophysiology.

[3]  A. Parker,et al.  Quantitative analysis of the responses of V1 neurons to horizontal disparity in dynamic random-dot stereograms. , 2002, Journal of neurophysiology.

[4]  I. Ohzawa,et al.  Encoding of binocular disparity by complex cells in the cat's visual cortex. , 1996, Journal of neurophysiology.

[5]  Eero P. Simoncelli,et al.  How MT cells analyze the motion of visual patterns , 2006, Nature Neuroscience.

[6]  Eero P. Simoncelli,et al.  Spatiotemporal Elements of Macaque V1 Receptive Fields , 2005, Neuron.

[7]  R. Shapley,et al.  Receptive field mechanisms of cat X and Y retinal ganglion cells , 1979, The Journal of general physiology.

[8]  B. Cumming,et al.  Suppressive Mechanisms in Monkey V1 Help to Solve the Stereo Correspondence Problem , 2011, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[9]  B. Cumming,et al.  Testing quantitative models of binocular disparity selectivity in primary visual cortex. , 2003, Journal of neurophysiology.

[10]  Eero P. Simoncelli,et al.  Spike-triggered neural characterization. , 2006, Journal of vision.

[11]  Bruce G Cumming,et al.  Sensors for impossible stimuli may solve the stereo correspondence problem , 2007, Nature Neuroscience.

[12]  G C DeAngelis,et al.  The physiology of stereopsis. , 2001, Annual review of neuroscience.

[13]  William Bialek,et al.  Real-time performance of a movement-sensitive neuron in the blowfly visual system: coding and information transfer in short spike sequences , 1988, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[14]  H. Wilson,et al.  Coarse spatial scales constrain the range of binocular fusion on fine scales. , 1991, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[15]  J. Touryan,et al.  Isolation of Relevant Visual Features from Random Stimuli for Cortical Complex Cells , 2002, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[16]  R. Shapley,et al.  The use of m-sequences in the analysis of visual neurons: Linear receptive field properties , 1997, Visual Neuroscience.

[17]  R. Freeman,et al.  Stereoscopic depth processing in the visual cortex: a coarse-to-fine mechanism , 2003, Nature Neuroscience.

[18]  I. Ohzawa,et al.  Stereoscopic depth discrimination in the visual cortex: neurons ideally suited as disparity detectors. , 1990, Science.

[19]  R. Shapley,et al.  Dynamics of orientation tuning in macaque V1: the role of global and tuned suppression. , 2003, Journal of neurophysiology.

[20]  Takahisa M. Sanada,et al.  Contributions of excitation and suppression in shaping spatial frequency selectivity of V1 neurons as revealed by binocular measurements. , 2012, Journal of neurophysiology.

[21]  David J. Fleet,et al.  Neural encoding of binocular disparity: Energy models, position shifts and phase shifts , 1996, Vision Research.

[22]  C. Blakemore,et al.  The neural mechanism of binocular depth discrimination , 1967, The Journal of physiology.

[23]  I. Ohzawa,et al.  Neural mechanisms for processing binocular information I. Simple cells. , 1999, Journal of neurophysiology.

[24]  P. O. Bishop,et al.  Binocular interaction on single units in cat striate cortex: Simultaneous stimulation by single moving slit with receptive fields in correspondence , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[25]  Ralph D Freeman,et al.  Temporal dynamics of binocular disparity processing in the central visual pathway. , 2004, Journal of neurophysiology.

[26]  Guillermo Sapiro,et al.  A subspace reverse-correlation technique for the study of visual neurons , 1997, Vision Research.

[27]  D. Ringach,et al.  Dynamics of Spatial Frequency Tuning in Macaque V1 , 2002, The Journal of Neuroscience.