Practices to Improve Group Creativity: A Longitudinal Field Investigation

Emergent teams are ad hoc part-time teams of strangers with very different perspectives who are asked by their company to come together and solve novel strategic problems. Most research on creativity has focused on individuals, with relatively little research on practices to improve group creativity. In this study we build upon our earlier qualitative research and longitudinally surveyed members of 31 different teams varying in the level of emergence. At three points in time, we asked team members about the practices they used to manage their creative process, focusing particularly on two practices: maintaining engagement, and co-creating shared boundary objects. We found that, these practices affected the customer's assessment of the team's innovativeness, but the timing of when these practices were introduced was critical. Implications for design of information systems includes 1) allowing members to maintain their engagement with the team's process even as they leave to attend to other activities and then rejoin the team, and 2) facilitate the co-creation of shared boundary objects early in the team's process. For managers, this research suggests the need to train team members in these two practices in order to further the innovative process.

[1]  A. Isen,et al.  The influence of positive affect on the unusualness of word associations. , 1985, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[2]  T. Baker,et al.  Creating Something from Nothing: Resource Construction through Entrepreneurial Bricolage , 2005 .

[3]  Jeffrey T. Polzer,et al.  Should we create a niche or fall in line? Identity negotiation and small group effectiveness. , 2000, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[4]  Beth A. Bechky,et al.  When Collections of Creatives Become Creative Collectives: A Field Study of Problem Solving at Work , 2006, Organ. Sci..

[5]  A. Edmondson Psychological Safety and Learning Behavior in Work Teams , 1999 .

[6]  Haridimos Tsoukas,et al.  A Dialogical Approach to the Creation of New Knowledge in Organizations , 2009, Organ. Sci..

[7]  S. Taggar Individual Creativity and Group Ability to Utilize Individual Creative Resources: A Multilevel Model , 2002 .

[8]  Benjamin F. Jones,et al.  Supporting Online Material Materials and Methods Figs. S1 to S3 References the Increasing Dominance of Teams in Production of Knowledge , 2022 .

[9]  Janice R. Kelly,et al.  The Effects of Time Pressure and Task Differences on Influence Modes and Accuracy in Decision-Making Groups , 1997 .

[10]  George P. Huber,et al.  Cross-Understanding: Implications for Group Cognition and Performance , 2010 .

[11]  Ann Majchrzak,et al.  Transcending Knowledge Differences in Cross-Functional Teams , 2012, Organ. Sci..

[12]  Debra L. Shapiro,et al.  Maximizing cross-functional new product teams' innovativeness and constraint adherence: A conflict communications perspective. , 2001 .

[13]  P. Carnevale,et al.  Social values and social conflict in creative problem solving and categorization. , 1998 .

[14]  Donald A. Schön Metaphor and Thought: Generative metaphor: A perspective on problem-setting in social policy , 1993 .

[15]  Kevin C. Stagl,et al.  Understanding team adaptation: a conceptual analysis and model. , 2006, The Journal of applied psychology.

[16]  Leigh Thompson,et al.  Creativity and innovation in organizational teams , 2005 .

[17]  Teresa M. Amabile,et al.  Assessing the Work Environment for Creativity , 1996 .

[18]  L. James,et al.  Estimating within-group interrater reliability with and without response bias. , 1984 .

[19]  N. Anderson,et al.  Innovation in top management teams , 1996 .

[20]  Steven J. Karau,et al.  Entrainment of Creativity in Small Groups , 1993 .

[21]  D. Dougherty Interpretive Barriers to Successful Product Innovation in Large Firms , 1992 .

[22]  L. Weingart,et al.  Representational gaps, information processing, and conflict in functionally diverse teams , 2007 .

[23]  Jeffrey T. Polzer,et al.  Capitalizing on Diversity: Interpersonal Congruence in Small Work Groups , 2001 .

[24]  Ute R. Hülsheger,et al.  Team-level predictors of innovation at work: a comprehensive meta-analysis spanning three decades of research. , 2009, The Journal of applied psychology.

[25]  C. Shalley,et al.  The emergence of team creative cognition: the role of diverse outside ties, sociocognitive network centrality, and team evolution , 2008 .

[26]  L. Mann,et al.  The relationship between individual creativity and team creativity: aggregating across people and time , 2004 .

[27]  Susan Leigh Star,et al.  Institutional Ecology, `Translations' and Boundary Objects: Amateurs and Professionals in Berkeley's Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907-39 , 1989 .

[28]  Jennifer M. George,et al.  Personality, affect, and behavior in groups. , 1990 .

[29]  Kalle Lyytinen,et al.  Boundary Objects in Design: An Ecological View of Design Artifacts , 2007, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[30]  S. Mohammed,et al.  Cognitive Diversity and Consensus in Group Decision Making: The Role of Inputs, Processes, and Outcomes. , 2001, Organizational behavior and human decision processes.

[31]  S. Karau,et al.  The effects of time scarcity and time abundance on group performance quality and interaction process. , 1992 .

[32]  R CarlilePaul A Pragmatic View of Knowledge and Boundaries , 2002 .

[33]  S. Vosburg The Effects of Positive and Negative Mood on Divergent-Thinking Performance , 1998 .

[34]  Kevin J. Dooley,et al.  The Effects of Repeat Collaboration on Creative Abrasion , 2010 .

[35]  Roderick M. Kramer,et al.  Swift trust and temporary groups. , 1996 .

[36]  Paul R. Carlile,et al.  A Pragmatic View of Knowledge and Boundaries: Boundary Objects in New Product Development , 2002, Organ. Sci..

[37]  Charles C. Snow,et al.  When Groups Consist of Multiple Nationalities: Towards a New Understanding of the Implications , 1998 .

[38]  C. Gersick Time and Transition in Work Teams: Toward a New Model of Group Development , 1988 .

[39]  Jennifer L. Gibbs,et al.  Unpacking the Concept of Virtuality: The Effects of , 2022 .

[40]  Teresa M. Amabile,et al.  From Guilford to Creative Synergy: Opening the Black Box of Team-Level Creativity , 2001 .

[41]  M. Lorenzen Creativity in context : Content, cost, chance and collection in the organization of the film industry , 2009 .

[42]  Beth A. Bechky Sharing Meaning Across Occupational Communities: The Transformation of Understanding on a Production Floor , 2003, Organ. Sci..

[43]  H. Gardner,et al.  Knowledge-Based Innovation: Emergence and Embedding of New Practice Areas in Management Consulting Firms , 2007 .

[44]  Terri R. Kurtzberg Feeling Creative, Being Creative: An Empirical Study of Diversity and Creativity in Teams , 2005 .

[45]  Teresa M. Amabile,et al.  Meeting the Challenges of a Person-Centric Work Psychology , 2011, Industrial and Organizational Psychology.

[46]  P. Paulus,et al.  Idea Generation in Groups : A Basis for Creativity in Organizations , 1994 .