Modified vegetation indices for estimating crop fraction of absorbed photosynthetically active radiation

The fraction of absorbed photosynthetically active radiation (FPAR) is an important biophysical parameter of vegetation. It is often estimated using vegetation indices (VIs) derived from remote-sensing data, such as the normalized difference VI (NDVI). Ideally a linear relationship is used for the estimation; however, most conventional VIs are affected by canopy background reflectance and their sensitivity to FPAR declines at high biomass. In this study, a multiplier, the ratio of the green to the red reflectance, was introduced to improve the linear relationship between VIs and crop FPAR. Three widely used VIs – NDVI, the green normalized difference VI (GNDVI), and the renormalized difference VI (RDVI) – were modified this way and were called modified NDVI (MNDVI), modified GNDVI (MGNDVI), and modified RDVI (MRDVI), respectively. A sensitivity study was applied to analyse the correlation between the three modified indices and the leaf area index (LAI) using the reflectance data simulated by the combined PROSPECT leaf optical properties model and SAIL canopy bidirectional reflectance model (PROSAIL model). The results revealed that these new indices reduced the saturation trend at high LAI and achieved better linearity with crop LAI at low-to-medium biomass when compared with their corresponding original versions. This has also been validated using in situ FPAR measurements over wheat and maize crops. In particular, estimation using MNDVI achieved a coefficient of determination (R2) of 0.97 for wheat and 0.86 for maize compared to 0.90 and 0.82 for NDVI, respectively, while MGNDVI achieved 0.97 for wheat and 0.88 for maize, compared to 0.90 and 0.81 for GNDVI, respectively. Algorithms based on the VIs when applied to both wheat and maize showed that MNDVI and MGNDVI achieved a better linearity relationship with FPAR (R2 = 0.92), in comparison with NDVI (R2 = 0.85) and GNDVI (R2 = 0.82). The study demonstrated that applying the green to red reflectance ratio can improve the accuracy of FPAR estimation.

[1]  A. Gitelson,et al.  Detection of Red Edge Position and Chlorophyll Content by Reflectance Measurements Near 700 nm , 1996 .

[2]  A. Viña,et al.  Comparison of different vegetation indices for the remote assessment of green leaf area index of crops , 2011 .

[3]  W. Verhoef,et al.  PROSPECT+SAIL models: A review of use for vegetation characterization , 2009 .

[4]  Bo-Cai Gao,et al.  Using EO-1 Hyperion to Simulate HyspIRI Products for a Coniferous Forest: The Fraction of PAR Absorbed by Chlorophyll $(\hbox{fAPAR}_{\rm chl})$ and Leaf Water Content (LWC) , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[5]  Liu Qinhuo,et al.  Research on Remote Sensing Model for FPAR Absorbed by Chlorophyll , 2006 .

[6]  Bingfang Wu,et al.  Quantifying winter wheat residue biomass with a spectral angle index derived from China Environmental Satellite data , 2014, Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinformation.

[7]  S. Goward,et al.  Vegetation canopy PAR absorptance and NDVI: An assessment for ten tree species with the SAIL model , 1997 .

[8]  Chaoyang Wu,et al.  Estimating chlorophyll content from hyperspectral vegetation indices : Modeling and validation , 2008 .

[9]  John R. Miller,et al.  Integrated narrow-band vegetation indices for prediction of crop chlorophyll content for application to precision agriculture , 2002 .

[10]  S. Running,et al.  Global products of vegetation leaf area and fraction absorbed PAR from year one of MODIS data , 2002 .

[11]  R. Myneni,et al.  On the relationship between FAPAR and NDVI , 1994 .

[12]  Bingfang Wu,et al.  Sensitivity analysis of retrieving fraction of absorbed photosynthetically active radiation (FPAR) using remote sensing data , 2016 .

[13]  P. Pinter.  Solar angle independence in the relationship between absorbed PAR and remotely sensed data for Alfalfa , 1993 .

[14]  Yujie Wang,et al.  Estimation of crop gross primary production ( GPP ) : fAPARchl versus MOD 15 A 2 FPAR , 2014 .

[15]  Roberta E. Martin,et al.  PROSPECT-4 and 5: Advances in the leaf optical properties model separating photosynthetic pigments , 2008 .

[16]  F. Baret,et al.  Neural network estimation of LAI, fAPAR, fCover and LAI×Cab, from top of canopy MERIS reflectance data : Principles and validation , 2006 .

[17]  Jadunandan Dash,et al.  An algorithm to derive the fraction of photosynthetically active radiation absorbed by photosynthetic elements of the canopy (FAPAR(ps)) from eddy covariance flux tower data. , 2013, The New phytologist.

[18]  A. Gitelson,et al.  Remote estimation of crop fractional vegetation cover: the use of noise equivalent as an indicator of performance of vegetation indices , 2013 .

[19]  M. Vincini,et al.  A broad-band leaf chlorophyll vegetation index at the canopy scale , 2008, Precision Agriculture.

[20]  John R. Miller,et al.  Remote Estimation of Crop Chlorophyll Content Using Spectral Indices Derived From Hyperspectral Data , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[21]  吴炳方 Wu Bingfang,et al.  overview on methods of deriving fraction of absorbed photosynthetically active radiation (FPAR) using remote sensing , 2012 .

[22]  A. Gitelson,et al.  Use of a green channel in remote sensing of global vegetation from EOS- MODIS , 1996 .

[23]  F. Baret,et al.  Potentials and limits of vegetation indices for LAI and APAR assessment , 1991 .

[24]  A. Viña,et al.  Green leaf area index estimation in maize and soybean: Combining vegetation indices to achieve maximal sensitivity , 2012 .

[25]  J. A. Schell,et al.  Monitoring vegetation systems in the great plains with ERTS , 1973 .

[26]  S. Goward,et al.  Vegetation canopy PAR absorptance and the normalized difference vegetation index - An assessment using the SAIL model , 1992 .

[27]  A. Gitelson,et al.  Novel algorithms for remote estimation of vegetation fraction , 2002 .

[28]  Katsuaki Koike,et al.  Applying vegetation indices to detect high water table zones in humid warm-temperate regions using satellite remote sensing , 2012, Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinformation.

[29]  D. Diner,et al.  Estimation of vegetation canopy leaf area index and fraction of absorbed photosynthetically active radiation from atmosphere‐corrected MISR data , 1998 .

[30]  W. Verhoef.  Light scattering by leaf layers with application to canopy reflectance modelling: The SAIL model , 1984 .

[31]  O. Hagolle,et al.  LAI, fAPAR and fCover CYCLOPES global products derived from VEGETATION: Part 1: Principles of the algorithm , 2007 .

[32]  Yoram J. Kaufman,et al.  MODIS NDVI Optimization To Fit the AVHRR Data Series—Spectral Considerations , 1998 .

[33]  Zheng Niu,et al.  The potential of the satellite derived green chlorophyll index for estimating midday light use efficiency in maize, coniferous forest and grassland , 2012 .

[34]  E. Kanemasu.  Seasonal canopy reflectance patterns of wheat, sorghum, and soybean , 1974 .

[35]  A. Gitelson.  Wide Dynamic Range Vegetation Index for remote quantification of biophysical characteristics of vegetation. , 2004, Journal of plant physiology.

[36]  A. Huete,et al.  Dependence of NDVI and SAVI on sun/sensor geometry and its effect on fAPAR relationships in Alfalfa , 1995 .

[37]  Jin Chen,et al.  A simple method for reconstructing a high-quality NDVI time-series data set based on the Savitzky-Golay filter , 2004 .

[38]  Prasad S. Thenkabail,et al.  Remote Sensing Estimation of Crop Biophysical Characteristics at Various Scales , 2016 .

[39]  G. Asner,et al.  Scaling PAR absorption from the leaf to landscape level in spatially heterogeneous ecosystems , 1997 .

[40]  Anatoly A. Gitelson,et al.  Remote estimation of gross primary productivity in crops using MODIS 250m data , 2013 .

[41]  Moon S. Kim,et al.  Estimating Corn Leaf Chlorophyll Concentration from Leaf and Canopy Reflectance , 2000 .

[42]  蒙继华,et al.  基于遥感的光合有效辐射吸收比率(FPAR) 估算方法综述 , 2012 .

[43]  J. Roujean,et al.  Estimating PAR absorbed by vegetation from bidirectional reflectance measurements , 1995 .

[44]  F. Baret,et al.  Effect of senescent leaves on NDVI-based estimates of fAPAR: Experimental and modelling evidences , 2004 .

[45]  Nadine Gobron,et al.  Monitoring FAPAR over land surfaces with remote sensing data , 2004, SPIE Remote Sensing.

[46]  A. Gitelson,et al.  Vegetation and soil lines in visible spectral space: A concept and technique for remote estimation of vegetation fraction , 2002 .

[47]  E. Ridao,et al.  Estimating fAPAR from nine vegetation indices for irrigated and nonirrigated faba bean and semileafless pea canopies , 1998 .

[48]  Anatoly A. Gitelson,et al.  Relationship between fraction of radiation absorbed by photosynthesizing maize and soybean canopies and NDVI from remotely sensed data taken at close range and from MODIS 250 m resolution data , 2014 .

[49]  Ranga B. Myneni,et al.  Estimation of global leaf area index and absorbed par using radiative transfer models , 1997, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[50]  S. Nilsson,et al.  Comparison of four global FAPAR datasets over Northern Eurasia for the year 2000 , 2010 .

[51]  A. Gitelson,et al.  Remote estimation of crop gross primary production with Landsat data , 2012 .

[52]  J. G. Lyon,et al.  Hyperspectral Vegetation Indices , 2016 .

[53]  James R. Kiniry,et al.  Ceptometer Deployment Method Affects Measurement of Fraction of Intercepted Photosynthetically Active Radiation , 2010 .

[54]  Aleixandre Verger,et al.  Optimal modalities for radiative transfer-neural network estimation of canopy biophysical characteristics: Evaluation over an agricultural area with CHRIS/PROBA observations , 2011 .

[55]  A. Savitzky,et al.  Smoothing and Differentiation of Data by Simplified Least Squares Procedures. , 1964 .

[56]  N. Goel,et al.  Influences of canopy architecture on relationships between various vegetation indices and LAI and Fpar: A computer simulation , 1994 .

[57]  N. Gobron,et al.  Designing optimal spectral indices: A feasibility and proof of concept study , 1999 .

[58]  C. D. Di Bella,et al.  Uncertainties in fPAR estimation of grass canopies under different stress situations and differences in architecture , 2010 .

[59]  F. Gao,et al.  Estimation of Crop Gross Primary Production (GPP): Fapar(sub Chl) Versus MOD15A2 FPAR , 2014 .

[60]  A. Viña,et al.  New developments in the remote estimation of the fraction of absorbed photosynthetically active radiation in crops , 2005 .

[61]  T. A. Black,et al.  Can a satellite-derived estimate of the fraction of PAR absorbed by chlorophyll (FAPARchl) improve predictions of light-use efficiency and ecosystem photosynthesis for a boreal aspen forest? , 2009 .