The Scientific Measurement System of the Gravity Recovery and Interior Laboratory (GRAIL) Mission

The Gravity Recovery and Interior Laboratory (GRAIL) mission to the Moon utilized an integrated scientific measurement system comprised of flight, ground, mission, and data system elements in order to meet the end-to-end performance required to achieve its scientific objectives. Modeling and simulation efforts were carried out early in the mission that influenced and optimized the design, implementation, and testing of these elements. Because the two prime scientific observables, range between the two spacecraft and range rates between each spacecraft and ground stations, can be affected by the performance of any element of the mission, we treated every element as part of an extended science instrument, a science system. All simulations and modeling took into account the design and configuration of each element to compute the expected performance and error budgets. In the process, scientific requirements were converted to engineering specifications that became the primary drivers for development and testing. Extensive simulations demonstrated that the scientific objectives could in most cases be met with significant margin. Errors are grouped into dynamic or kinematic sources and the largest source of non-gravitational error comes from spacecraft thermal radiation. With all error models included, the baseline solution shows that estimation of the lunar gravity field is robust against both dynamic and kinematic errors and a nominal field of degree 300 or better could be achieved according to the scaled Kaula rule for the Moon. The core signature is more sensitive to modeling errors and can be recovered with a small margin.

[1]  Jeongrae Kim,et al.  Error Analysis of a Low-Low Satellite-to-Satellite Tracking Mission , 2002 .

[2]  Hiroshi Kinoshita,et al.  Note on the relation between the equinox and Guinot's non-rotating origin , 1983 .

[3]  Fred T. Krogh,et al.  Changing stepsize in the integration of differential equations using modified divided differences , 1974 .

[4]  Slava G. Turyshev,et al.  General relativistic observables of the GRAIL mission , 2012, Physical Review D.

[5]  Sami W. Asmar,et al.  Gravity Recovery and Interior Laboratory Simulations of Static and Temporal Gravity Field , 2012 .

[6]  Eugene Gregory Fahnestock Comprehensive Gravity and Dynamics Model Determination of Binary Asteroid Systems , 2009 .

[7]  Ralph B. Roncoli,et al.  GRAIL Trajectory Design: Lunar Orbit Insertion through Science , 2010 .

[8]  David E. Smith,et al.  Gravity Recovery and Interior Laboratory (GRAIL): Mapping the Lunar Interior from Crust to Core , 2013, Space Science Reviews.

[9]  Luciano Iess,et al.  Spacecraft Doppler tracking: Noise budget and accuracy achievable in precision radio science observations , 2005 .

[10]  J. B. Thomas,et al.  Instrument of Grace: GPS augments gravity measurements , 2003 .

[11]  M. Watkins,et al.  The gravity recovery and climate experiment: Mission overview and early results , 2004 .

[12]  J. Guinn,et al.  TOPEX/POSEIDON Operational Orbit Determination Results Using Global Positioning Satellites , 1994 .

[13]  P. K. Seidelmann,et al.  The new definition of universal time , 1982 .

[14]  J. B. Thomas An Analysis of Gravity-Field Estimation Based on Intersatellite Dual-1-Way Biased Ranging , 1999 .

[15]  Z. Altamimi,et al.  Results and analysis of the ITRF94. , 1996 .

[16]  Sami W. Asmar Radio as a Science Tool [Point of View] , 2010, Proc. IEEE.

[17]  T. Lederle,et al.  Expressions for the precession quantities based upon the IAU /1976/ system of astronomical constants , 1977 .

[18]  X. X. Newhall,et al.  Estimation of the lunar physical librations , 1996 .

[19]  Richard G. Gordon,et al.  No-net-rotation model of current plate velocities incorporating plate motion model NUVEL-1 , 1991 .

[20]  Joseph G. Beerer,et al.  Operating the Dual-Orbiter GRAIL Mission to Measure the Moon's Gravity , 2012 .

[21]  W. M. Folkner,et al.  DSN Station Locations and Uncertainties , 1997 .

[22]  David L. Valentine,et al.  Seismic Detection of the Lunar Core , 2011 .

[23]  T. D. Moyer Formulation for Observed and Computed Values of Deep Space Network Data Types for Navigation , 2003 .

[24]  Jeongrae Kim,et al.  Simulation study of a low-low satellite-to-satellite tracking mission , 2000 .

[25]  John M. Wahr,et al.  The forced nutations of an elliptical, rotating, elastic and oceanless earth , 1981 .

[26]  Samuel Pines,et al.  Uniform Representation of the Gravitational Potential and its Derivatives , 1973 .

[27]  Rune Floberghagen,et al.  Lunar albedo force modeling and its effect on low lunar orbit and gravity field determination , 1999 .

[28]  P. K. Seidelmann,et al.  1980 IAU Theory of Nutation: The final report of the IAU Working Group on Nutation , 1982 .

[29]  Anthony J. Mannucci,et al.  A global mapping technique for GPS‐derived ionospheric total electron content measurements , 1998 .

[30]  W. M. Kaula Theory of satellite geodesy , 1966 .

[31]  Charles L. Lawson,et al.  Solving least squares problems , 1976, Classics in applied mathematics.

[32]  B. Tapley,et al.  Statistical Orbit Determination , 2004 .

[33]  Rabi T. Wang,et al.  The Lunar Gravity Ranging System for the Gravity Recovery and Interior Laboratory (GRAIL) Mission , 2013 .

[34]  Dah-Ning Yuan,et al.  Spacecraft Thermal and Optical Modeling Impacts on Estimation of the GRAIL Lunar Gravity Field , 2012 .

[35]  R. Roncoli,et al.  Mission Design Overview for the Gravity Recovery and Interior Laboratory (GRAIL) Mission , 2010 .

[36]  A. Konopliv,et al.  Recent Gravity Models as a Result of the Lunar Prospector Mission , 2001 .

[37]  Tom L. Hoffman,et al.  GRAIL: Gravity mapping the moon , 2009, 2009 IEEE Aerospace conference.

[38]  Dah-Ning Yuan,et al.  Gravity field of Mars: A 75th Degree and Order Model , 2001 .

[39]  James G. Williams,et al.  A scheme for lunar inner core detection , 2007 .