Detecting hidden targets: a procedure for studying performance in a mine-detection-like task

We report preliminary results from an experiment designed to study the perceptual and learning processes involved in the detection of land mines. Subjects attempted to identify the location of spatially distributed targets identified by a sweeping a cursor across a computer screen. Each point on the screen was associated with a certain tone intensity; targets were louder than 'distractor' objects. We looked at the effects on target detection and false-alarm rates of the intensity difference between target and distractor signals, the number of distractor signals, the number of distractors and training order. The time to detect 50 percent of targets was measured by a rapid adaptive technique which generated reliable thresholds within few trials. The result are consistent with a simple model for the detection of cryptic prey by foraging predators: search was slower with more distractors, and the effect of distractors was greater when S/N ratio was lower. Although subjects got no accuracy feedback, performance improved somewhat with experience and was slightly better in the low S/N condition when it followed the high S/N condition. The procedure seems to be a useful one for studying more complex mine-related detection tasks with a range of signal types and numbers of concurrent detection signals.

[1]  J. Staddon,et al.  Searching for Cryptic Prey: The Effect of Search Rate , 1983, The American Naturalist.

[2]  H. Terrace,et al.  OF THE EXPERIMENTAL ANALYSIS OF BEHAVIOR DISCRIMINATION LEARNING WITH AND WITHOUT " ERRORS " ' , 2005 .

[3]  T. Guilford,et al.  Search image versus search rate: Two different ways to enhance prey capture , 1989, Animal Behaviour.

[4]  S. Shettleworth,et al.  Detection of cryptic prey: search image or search rate? , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[5]  A Pentland,et al.  Maximum likelihood estimation: The best PEST , 1980, Perception & psychophysics.

[6]  Robert P. Gendron,et al.  A Laboratory Simulation of Foraging Behavior: The Effect of Search Rate on the Probability of Detecting Prey , 1984, The American Naturalist.

[7]  J. Staddon,et al.  Optimal Detection of Cryptic Prey May Lead to Predator Switching , 1983, The American Naturalist.

[8]  M. Sidman,et al.  The effectiveness of fading in programming a simultaneous form discrimination for retarded children. , 1967, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[9]  D S Blough Effects of the number and form of stimuli on visual search in the pigeon. , 1979, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[10]  B. Treutwein Adaptive psychophysical procedures , 1995, Vision Research.

[11]  N. Mackintosh,et al.  Visual search for cryptic stimuli in pigeons: implications for the search image and search rate hypotheses , 1995, Animal Behaviour.