The scapulo-humeral rhythm: effects of 2-D roentgen projection.

Abstract Objective. The objective of this study is to illustrate the low accuracy of two-dimensional (2-D) X-ray projection methods for the quantification of the three-dimensional (3-D) shoulder motions. Background. The traditional method for the quantification of the gleno-humeral motion is by means of 2-D X-ray recording. The motion was characterized by the scapulo-humeral rhythm: the ratio of the nett humeral elevation over nett scapular rotation. The method was based on the quantification of the planar projection of the spatial positions of X-ray dense structures of the scapula. The deformations introduced by the central projection method, a feature of X-ray projection, cannot be compensated for by calibration: the position of the scapula with respect to the camera setting is unknown, and skeletal landmarks of the scapula cannot uniquely be identified. The transformation from 3-D orientations to 2-D angles will, therefore, be inaccurate. Methods. A 2-D X-ray projection of the scapula during a typical arm abduction was simulated. The 3-D motion was obtained by means of palpation and subsequent digitization of skeletal landmarks of the scapula. The 3-D positions of the recorded landmarks were projected on a plane by a simulation based on the parameters of the X-ray equipment. The scapulo-humeral rhythm was calculated for the different scapular landmarks, and for the orientation of the subject with respect to the projection axis. The results were compared with previous published scapulo-humeral rhythms. Results. The scapulo-humeral rhythm depends both on the choice of the skeletal landmarks, used to quantify the scapular rotations, and on the orientation of the subject in the X-ray setting. The full range of results obtained from earlier published experiments could be obtained from a simulation based on a single 3-D arm abduction. Conclusions. The 2-D scapulo-humeral rhythm, obtained from planar X-ray projection, is an inaccurate parameter to define the scapular motions.

[1]  L. Freedman,et al.  Abduction of the arm in the scapular plane: scapular and glenohumeral movements. A roentgenographic study. , 1966, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[2]  G R Johnson,et al.  A method for the measurement of three-dimensional scapular movement. , 1993, Clinical biomechanics.

[3]  B Peterson,et al.  Biomechanical model of the human shoulder joint--II. The shoulder rhythm. , 1991, Journal of biomechanics.

[4]  F. V. D. van der Helm,et al.  Three-dimensional recording and description of motions of the shoulder mechanism. , 1995, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[5]  A J Cox,et al.  Biomechanics of the patello-femoral joint. , 1990, Clinical biomechanics.

[6]  G R Johnson,et al.  Measurement of three-dimensional shoulder movement by an electromagnetic sensor. , 1990, Clinical biomechanics.

[7]  I Michiels,et al.  Kinematics of shoulder abduction in the scapular plane. On the influence of abduction velocity and external load. , 1995, Clinical biomechanics.

[8]  J. H. D. Groot,et al.  The shoulder: a kinematic and dynamic analysis of motion and loading , 1998 .

[9]  J. Saunders,et al.  Observations of the Function of the Shoulder Joint , 1996, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[10]  N. Poppen,et al.  Normal and abnormal motion of the shoulder. , 1976, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[11]  J. G. Bonnin The Shoulder Girdle , 1951 .

[12]  W. Forrest,et al.  A Biomechanical Analysis of Scapular Rotation during Arm Abduction in the Scapular Plane , 1988, American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation.

[13]  Jurriaan H. de Groot The variability of shoulder motions recorded by means of palpation. , 1997 .

[14]  J. C. Waterland,et al.  Shoulder movements during abduction in the scapular plane. , 1970, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.