A Process-Model Account of Task Interruption and Resumption: When Does Encoding of the Problem State Occur?

Memory for goals theory (Altmann & Trafton, 2002) describes how people suspend and resume an interrupted task by encoding, or rehearsing, the current problem state at the point of interruption and recalling this state after the interruption. In this work we investigated the timing of the encoding process, attempting to determine the most likely strategies for when to perform encoding of interrupted problem state. We examined several candidate encoding strategies and developed computational cognitive models to represent each strategy, embedding the models into a larger model of behavior in a interruption-tracking task. Comparison of the model simulations with recent empirical data suggests that encoding of problem state occurs for a short time at the start of the interruption period and is performed concurrently with the interrupting task.

[1]  A Latorella Kara,et al.  Investigating Interruptions: Implications for Flightdeck Performance , 1999 .

[2]  Dario D. Salvucci.  An integrated model of eye movements and visual encoding , 2001, Cognitive Systems Research.

[3]  J. Gregory Trafton,et al.  Memory for goals: an activation-based model , 2002, Cogn. Sci..

[4]  John R Anderson,et al.  An integrated theory of the mind. , 2004, Psychological review.

[5]  Brian P. Bailey,et al.  Understanding changes in mental workload during execution of goal-directed tasks and its application for interruption management , 2008, TCHI.

[6]  Dario D. Salvucci,et al.  Effects of Memory Rehearsal on Driver Performance: Experiment and Theoretical Account , 2008, Hum. Factors.

[7]  Jelmer P. Borst,et al.  The Costs of Multitasking in Threaded Cognition , 2007 .

[8]  W H Cordell,et al.  Work interrupted: a comparison of workplace interruptions in emergency departments and primary care offices. , 2001, Annals of emergency medicine.

[9]  J. Gregory Trafton,et al.  Preparing to resume an interrupted task: effects of prospective goal encoding and retrospective rehearsal , 2003, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[10]  E. M. Altmann,et al.  Timecourse of recovery from task interruption: Data and a model , 2006, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[11]  John Anderson,et al.  An integrated theory of prospective time interval estimation: the role of cognition, attention, and learning. , 2007, Psychological review.

[12]  J. Trafton,et al.  The effect of interruption duration and demand on resuming suspended goals. , 2008, Journal of experimental psychology. Applied.

[13]  Dario D. Salvucci,et al.  Threaded cognition: an integrated theory of concurrent multitasking. , 2008, Psychological review.

[14]  Robert L Sumwalt,et al.  Cockpit Interruptions and Distractions: Effective Management Requires a Careful Balancing Act , 1999 .

[15]  Ann Blandford,et al.  Further investigations into post-completion error : the effects of interruption position and duration , 2006 .

[16]  Dylan M. Jones,et al.  Interruption of the Tower of London task: support for a goal-activation approach. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[17]  Wayne D. Gray,et al.  An integrated model of cognitive control in task switching. , 2008, Psychological review.

[18]  Mary Czerwinski,et al.  Effects of instant messaging interruptions on computing tasks , 2000, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[19]  Christopher A. Monk,et al.  Recovering From Interruptions: Implications for Driver Distraction Research , 2004, Hum. Factors.