Excellent online friendships: an Aristotelian defense of social media

I defend social media’s potential to support Aristotelian virtue friendship against a variety of objections. I begin with Aristotle’s claim that the foundation of the best friendships is a shared life. Friends share the distinctively human and valuable components of their lives, especially reasoning together by sharing conversation and thoughts, and communal engagement in valued activities. Although some have charged that shared living is not possible between friends who interact through digital social media, I argue that social media preserves the relevantly human and valuable portions of life, especially reasoning, play, and exchange of ideas. I then consider several criticisms of social media’s potential to host friendships, and refute or weaken the force of these objections, using this conception of a distinctively human shared life. I conclude that we should use the shared life to evaluate features of social media and norms for users’ conduct.

[1]  斎藤 香,et al.  Friendship , 1998, Terror Capitalism.

[2]  Aristotle,et al.  THE NICOMACHEAN ETHICS , 1990 .

[3]  Michael Monsour.  Meanings of Intimacy in Cross- and Same-Sex Friendships , 1992 .

[4]  Barry Wellman,et al.  Strength of Internet Ties, The , 2006 .

[5]  Shannon Vallor,et al.  Flourishing on facebook: virtue friendship & new social media , 2012, Ethics and Information Technology.

[6]  Patricia Wallace.  The Psychology of the Internet , 1999 .

[7]  Cliff Lampe,et al.  The Benefits of Facebook "Friends: " Social Capital and College Students' Use of Online Social Network Sites , 2007, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[8]  Keith N. Hampton,et al.  Does the Internet Increase, Decrease, or Supplement Social Capital? , 2001 .

[9]  Joseph B. Walther,et al.  Selective self-presentation in computer-mediated communication: Hyperpersonal dimensions of technology, language, and cognition , 2007, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[10]  B. Bank,et al.  Gender and friendship: Why are men's best same‐sex friendships less intimate and supportive? , 2000 .

[11]  S. Roeser,et al.  Emotions and Ethical Considerations of Women Undergoing IVF-Treatments , 2011, HEC forum : an interdisciplinary journal on hospitals' ethical and legal issues.

[12]  Cliff Lampe,et al.  The "S" in Social Network Games: Initiating, Maintaining, and Enhancing Relationships , 2011, 2011 44th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[13]  Larry May,et al.  Male Friendship and Intimacy , 1992, Hypatia.

[14]  Adam Briggle,et al.  Real friends: how the Internet can foster friendship , 2008, Ethics and Information Technology.

[15]  Alexis M. Elder.  Why Bad People Can't be Good Friends , 2014 .

[16]  伊藤 瑞子.  Living and learning with new media : summary of findings from the digital youth project , 2009 .

[17]  Dean Cocking,et al.  Unreal Friends , 2001, Ethics and Information Technology.

[18]  Michael T. McFall.  Real character-friends: Aristotelian friendship, living together, and technology , 2012, Ethics and Information Technology.

[19]  Katelyn Y. A. McKenna,et al.  Oxford Handbook of Internet Psychology , 2007 .

[20]  Nicholas John Munn,et al.  The reality of friendship within immersive virtual worlds , 2012, Ethics and Information Technology.

[21]  Why virtual friendship is no genuine friendship , 2012, Ethics and Information Technology.

[22]  V. Derlega,et al.  Gender differences in the initiation and attribution of tactile intimacy , 1988 .

[23]  J. Søraker.  How shall i compare thee? Comparing the prudential value of actual virtual friendship , 2012, Ethics and Information Technology.