Impact reduction for redundant manipulators using augmented impedance control

In this article, the problem of controlling redundant manipulators to reduce collision impact effects is considered, and an augmented kinematics and impedance control scheme is proposed for its solution. The proposed scheme achieves satisfactory performance by minimizing the magnitudes of impulsive forces as well as reducing rebound effects of the end-effector. In the proposed control scheme, kinematic redundancy is resolved using an augmented kinematics approach where the augmentation of the Jacobian matrix is based on an impact model derived using the Cartesian-space dynamic model of the manipulator. The proposed impact controller uses a simplified impedance control scheme aimed at reducing impulsive forces as well as rebound effects. The performance of the proposed controller is illustrated by computer simulations. © 2995 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

[1]  Neville Hogan,et al.  Stable execution of contact tasks using impedance control , 1987, Proceedings. 1987 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[2]  Neville Hogan,et al.  Impedance Control: An Approach to Manipulation: Part I—Theory , 1985 .

[3]  Homayoun Seraji,et al.  Configuration control of redundant manipulators: theory and implementation , 1989, IEEE Trans. Robotics Autom..

[4]  Kamal Youcef-Toumi,et al.  Impact and force control , 1989, Proceedings, 1989 International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[5]  John Baillieul,et al.  Kinematic programming alternatives for redundant manipulators , 1985, Proceedings. 1985 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[6]  James K. Mills,et al.  Stability of robotic manipulators during transition to and from compliant motion , 1990, Autom..

[7]  Antti J. Koivo,et al.  Dynamic optimum control of redundant manipulators , 1991, Proceedings. 1991 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[9]  Yuan F. Zheng,et al.  Mathematical modeling of a robot collision with its environment , 1985, J. Field Robotics.

[10]  J. Y. S. Luh,et al.  Resolved-acceleration control of mechanical manipulators , 1980 .

[11]  A. A. Maciejewski,et al.  Obstacle Avoidance , 2005 .

[12]  Robert J. Anderson,et al.  Dynamic damping control: implementation issues and simulation results , 1990, Proceedings., IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[13]  R. Colbaugh,et al.  Improved configuration control for redundant robots , 1990, J. Field Robotics.

[14]  Pradeep K. Khosla,et al.  Experimental verification of a strategy for impact control , 1991, Proceedings. 1991 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[15]  Yu Wang,et al.  Modeling impact dynamics for robotic operations , 1987, Proceedings. 1987 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[16]  Ian D. Walker,et al.  The use of kinematic redundancy in reducing impact and contact effects in manipulation , 1990, Proceedings., IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[17]  Wyatt S. Newman,et al.  Augmented impedance control: an approach to compliant control of kinematically redundant manipulators , 1991, Proceedings. 1991 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.