Flexible intuitions of Euclidean geometry in an Amazonian indigene group

Kant argued that Euclidean geometry is synthesized on the basis of an a priori intuition of space. This proposal inspired much behavioral research probing whether spatial navigation in humans and animals conforms to the predictions of Euclidean geometry. However, Euclidean geometry also includes concepts that transcend the perceptible, such as objects that are infinitely small or infinitely large, or statements of necessity and impossibility. We tested the hypothesis that certain aspects of nonperceptible Euclidian geometry map onto intuitions of space that are present in all humans, even in the absence of formal mathematical education. Our tests probed intuitions of points, lines, and surfaces in participants from an indigene group in the Amazon, the Mundurucu, as well as adults and age-matched children controls from the United States and France and younger US children without education in geometry. The responses of Mundurucu adults and children converged with that of mathematically educated adults and children and revealed an intuitive understanding of essential properties of Euclidean geometry. For instance, on a surface described to them as perfectly planar, the Mundurucu's estimations of the internal angles of triangles added up to ∼180 degrees, and when asked explicitly, they stated that there exists one single parallel line to any given line through a given point. These intuitions were also partially in place in the group of younger US participants. We conclude that, during childhood, humans develop geometrical intuitions that spontaneously accord with the principles of Euclidean geometry, even in the absence of training in mathematics.

[1]  Frans A. J. Verstraten,et al.  Does monocular visual space contain planes? , 2010, Acta psychologica.

[2]  Pierre Pica,et al.  Log or Linear? Distinct Intuitions of the Number Scale in Western and Amazonian Indigene Cultures , 2008, Science.

[3]  R. Shepard Perceptual-cognitive universals as reflections of the world. , 2001, The Behavioral and brain sciences.

[4]  Valeria Anna Sovrano,et al.  Doing Socrates experiment right: controlled rearing studies of geometrical knowledge in animals , 2009, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[5]  R. Wehner,et al.  Path integration in a three-dimensional maze: ground distance estimation keeps desert ants Cataglyphis fortis on course , 2005, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[6]  Pierre Pica,et al.  Core knowledge of geometry in an Amazonian indigene group. , 2006, Science.

[7]  L. Rips,et al.  Conceptual Change in Non-Euclidean Mathematics , 2006 .

[8]  Stella F. Lourenco,et al.  The Representation of Geometric Cues in Infancy. , 2008, Infancy : the official journal of the International Society on Infant Studies.

[9]  P. Day The Organisation of Learning , 1977 .

[10]  Barbara Landau,et al.  Early map use as an unlearned ability , 1986, Cognition.

[11]  H Gleitman,et al.  Spatial knowledge and geometric representation in a child blind from birth. , 1981, Science.

[12]  Emilio Kropff,et al.  Place cells, grid cells, and the brain's spatial representation system. , 2008, Annual review of neuroscience.

[13]  N. Chapuis,et al.  Short Cuts by Dogs in Natural Surroundings , 1987 .

[14]  R. Klatzky,et al.  PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE Research Article Use of Cognitive Versus Perceptual Heading During Imagined Locomotion Depends on the Response Mode , 2022 .

[15]  Paul M. Laporte,et al.  Mathematical Analysis of Binocular Vision , 1950 .

[16]  Anna Shusterman,et al.  Young children's spontaneous use of geometry in maps. , 2008, Developmental science.

[17]  Gary Hatfield,et al.  Representation and constraints: the inverse problem and the structure of visual space. , 2003, Acta psychologica.

[18]  Neil Burgess,et al.  Visual influence on path integration in darkness indicates a multimodal representation of large-scale space , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[19]  J. L. Gould The Locale Map of Honey Bees: Do Insects Have Cognitive Maps? , 1986, Science.

[20]  Jonathan W. Kelly,et al.  The shape of human navigation: How environmental geometry is used in maintenance of spatial orientation , 2008, Cognition.

[21]  N. Burgess Spatial Cognition and the Brain , 2008, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[22]  Almut Hupbach,et al.  Reorientation in a rhombic environment: No evidence for an encapsulated geometric module , 2005 .

[23]  T Indow,et al.  A critical review of Luneburg's model with regard to global structure of visual space. , 1991, Psychological review.

[24]  J. G. Bremner,et al.  Form perception at birth: Cohen and Younger (1984) revisited. , 1991, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[25]  Pierre Pica,et al.  Exact Equality and Successor Function: Two Key Concepts on the Path towards Understanding Exact Numbers , 2008, Philosophical psychology.

[26]  Sang Ah Lee,et al.  Beyond Core Knowledge: Natural Geometry , 2010, Cogn. Sci..

[27]  Elizabeth S Spelke,et al.  Development of Sensitivity to Geometry in Visual Forms. , 2009, Human evolution.

[28]  S. Dehaene,et al.  Exact and Approximate Arithmetic in an Amazonian Indigene Group , 2004, Science.

[29]  N. Newcombe,et al.  Is there a geometric module for spatial orientation? squaring theory and evidence , 2005, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[30]  E. Tolman Cognitive maps in rats and men. , 1948, Psychological review.

[31]  J. Huttenlocher,et al.  Making Space: The Development of Spatial Representation and Reasoning , 2000 .

[32]  L CHARNWOOD,et al.  Mathematical analysis of binocular vision. , 1948, The Optician.

[33]  Gary Hatfield The Natural and the Normative: Theories of Spatial Perception from Kant to Helmholtz , 1991 .