Qualidade do Posicionamento em Aplicativos VGI Obtido por Sensores de Localização em Smartphones

The paper presents the positioning quality evaluation acquired by localization sensors coupled in smartphones, verifying its performance for Volunteered Geographic Information (VGI) field surveys. The experiments were carried as a case study, in which the coordinates collected in a VGI application (Hidromapp) were compared with their respective reference counterparts. The samples were collected under different conditions: using 05 smartphones with different characteristics and configurations. Based on the discrepancies, the positional accuracy was calculated for each of the samples, using the statistical indicator RMSE, including the analysis of different factors observed in the experiment. Then, the positioning quality was evaluated from the data use perspective (fitness-for-purpose), and was observed if the calculated positional accuracy is satisfactory to the Hidromapp application purposes. In results, it was identified that smartphones make possible spatial data collect with planimetric positional accuracy between 5m and 20m (safe range observed), depending on the survey conditions, and on the characteristics and configurations of the devices used. For the Hidromapp application, which aims to provide observed data support for hydrodynamic models and flood simulation, the performance of smartphones was considered satisfactory according to the researchers consulted.

[1]  Vyron Antoniou,et al.  MEASURES AND INDICATORS OF VGI QUALITY: AN OVERVIEW , 2015 .

[2]  Geovano Pedro Hoffmann,et al.  O USO DE GEOTECNOLOGIAS LIVRES: QGIS E EPICOLLECT NO LEVANTAMENTO DE DADOS EM GEOCIÊNCIAS , 2018, GeoFocus Revista Internacional de Ciencia y Tecnología de la Información Geográfica.

[3]  Claudia Robbi Sluter,et al.  O PROBLEMA DA QUALIDADE DE DADOS ESPACIAIS NA ERA DAS INFORMAÇÕES GEOGRÁFICAS VOLUNTÁRIAS , 2015 .

[4]  M. Goodchild Citizens as sensors: the world of volunteered geography , 2007 .

[5]  Paul A. Zandbergen,et al.  Accuracy of iPhone Locations: A Comparison of Assisted GPS, WiFi and Cellular Positioning , 2009 .

[6]  Alexander Zipf,et al.  A taxonomy of quality assessment methods for volunteered and crowdsourced geographic information , 2018, Trans. GIS.

[7]  A. Esmaili,et al.  Quality Assessment of Volunteered Geographic Information , 2013 .

[8]  Maria A. Brovelli,et al.  A New Method for the Assessment of Spatial Accuracy and Completeness of OpenStreetMap Building Footprints , 2018, ISPRS Int. J. Geo Inf..

[10]  Sean J. Barbeau,et al.  Positional Accuracy of Assisted GPS Data from High-Sensitivity GPS-enabled Mobile Phones , 2011, Journal of Navigation.

[11]  Mauricio Galo,et al.  ACURÁCIA E PRECISÃO: REVENDO OS CONCEITOS DE FORMA ACURADA , 2009 .

[12]  M Brown,et al.  Usability of Geographic Information: current challenges and future directions. , 2013, Applied ergonomics.

[13]  Kaveh Pahlavan,et al.  Location awareness for everyday smart computing , 2009, 2009 International Conference on Telecommunications.

[14]  M. Haklay How Good is Volunteered Geographical Information? A Comparative Study of OpenStreetMap and Ordnance Survey Datasets , 2010 .

[15]  Pascal Neis,et al.  A Comprehensive Framework for Intrinsic OpenStreetMap Quality Analysis , 2014, Trans. GIS.

[16]  Julián Tomaštík,et al.  Horizontal accuracy and applicability of smartphone GNSS positioning in forests , 2016 .

[17]  Guy De Tré,et al.  Data quality assessment in volunteered geographic decision support , 2018 .

[18]  Kyandoghere Kyamakya,et al.  Mobile positioning technologies in cellular networks: an evaluation of their performance metrics , 2002, MILCOM 2002. Proceedings.

[19]  Yvan Bédard,et al.  SPATIAL DATA UNCERTAINTY IN THE VGI WORLD: GOING FROM CONSUMER TO PRODUCER , 2019 .