Characterising auditory filter nonlinearity

An important aspect of auditory nonlinearity is that psychoacoustically measured auditory filters broaden as the level at which they are measured increases. However, it is not yet clear whether the change in filter shape is controlled primarily by the level of the probe or that of the masker. We have therefore developed a new method for fitting filter shapes to notched-noise data in which filter parameters depend explicitly on signal level (either probe or masker). By applying this technique to a set of notched-noise data in which both fixed-probe and fixed-masker paradigms have been used at a range of levels, we have been able to show that models in which filter parameters depend on probe level are considerably more successful than models in which filter parameters depend upon masker level. The results from this new procedure have enabled us to describe the nonlinear changes in auditory filter shape at 2 kHz with only five parameters. Also discussed are the implications of these findings for the generation of excitation patterns and for the computational implementation of simple, yet reasonably realistic nonlinear auditory filters whose shape depends on their output.

[1]  E. Shaw Transformation of sound pressure level from the free field to the eardrum in the horizontal plane. , 1974, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[2]  R. Patterson,et al.  The deterioration of hearing with age: frequency selectivity, the critical ratio, the audiogram, and speech threshold. , 1982, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[3]  L. Carney,et al.  A model for the responses of low-frequency auditory-nerve fibers in cat. , 1993, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[4]  Julius L. Goldstein,et al.  Modeling rapid waveform compression on the basilar membrane as multiple-bandpass-nonlinearity filtering , 1990, Hearing Research.

[5]  J J Rosowski,et al.  The effects of external- and middle-ear filtering on auditory threshold and noise-induced hearing loss. , 1991, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[6]  R A Lutfi,et al.  On the growth of masking asymmetry with stimulus intensity. , 1984, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[7]  Julius L. Goldstein Updating Cochlear Driven Models of Auditory Perception: A New Model for Nonlinear Auditory Frequency Analysing Filters , 1989 .

[8]  W. S. Rhode Observations of the vibration of the basilar membrane in squirrel monkeys using the Mössbauer technique. , 1971, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[9]  Brian C. J. Moore,et al.  Formulae describing frequency selectivity as a function of frequency and level, and their use in calculating excitation patterns , 1987, Hearing Research.

[10]  Mario A. Ruggero,et al.  Basilar membrane responses to clicks , 1992 .

[11]  D L Weber,et al.  Growth of masking and the auditory filter. , 1977, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[12]  M R Leek,et al.  Auditory filter shapes of normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners in continuous broadband noise. , 1993, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[13]  L. Robles,et al.  Basilar membrane mechanics at the base of the chinchilla cochlea. I. Input-output functions, tuning curves, and response phases. , 1986, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[14]  Brian R Glasberg,et al.  Derivation of auditory filter shapes from notched-noise data , 1990, Hearing Research.

[15]  R. Patterson,et al.  Off-frequency listening and auditory-filter asymmetry. , 1980, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[16]  Stuart Rosen,et al.  Characterizing Changes in Auditory Filter Bandwidth as a Function of Level , 1992 .

[17]  S Rosen,et al.  Auditory filter bandwidths as a function of level at low frequencies (125 Hz-1 kHz) , 1992, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.