Characterizing Interdisciplinarity of Researchers and Research Topics Using Web Search Engines

Researchers' networks have been subject to active modeling and analysis. Earlier literature mostly focused on citation or co-authorship networks reconstructed from annotated scientific publication databases, which have several limitations. Recently, general-purpose web search engines have also been utilized to collect information about social networks. Here we reconstructed, using web search engines, a network representing the relatedness of researchers to their peers as well as to various research topics. Relatedness between researchers and research topics was characterized by visibility boost—increase of a researcher's visibility by focusing on a particular topic. It was observed that researchers who had high visibility boosts by the same research topic tended to be close to each other in their network. We calculated correlations between visibility boosts by research topics and researchers' interdisciplinarity at the individual level (diversity of topics related to the researcher) and at the social level (his/her centrality in the researchers' network). We found that visibility boosts by certain research topics were positively correlated with researchers' individual-level interdisciplinarity despite their negative correlations with the general popularity of researchers. It was also found that visibility boosts by network-related topics had positive correlations with researchers' social-level interdisciplinarity. Research topics' correlations with researchers' individual- and social-level interdisciplinarities were found to be nearly independent from each other. These findings suggest that the notion of “interdisciplinarity" of a researcher should be understood as a multi-dimensional concept that should be evaluated using multiple assessment means.

[1]  M. Newman Clustering and preferential attachment in growing networks. , 2001, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[2]  Mark E. J. Newman,et al.  Structure and Dynamics of Networks , 2009 .

[3]  Fredrik Åström,et al.  Changes in the LIS research front: Time-sliced cocitation analyses of LIS journal articles, 1990-2004 , 2007, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[4]  D J PRICE,et al.  NETWORKS OF SCIENTIFIC PAPERS. , 1965, Science.

[5]  Loet Leydesdorff,et al.  Betweenness centrality as an indicator of the interdisciplinarity of scientific journals , 2007, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[6]  Bart De Moor,et al.  Weighted hybrid clustering by combining text mining and bibliometrics on a large-scale journal database , 2010, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[7]  Kôiti Hasida,et al.  POLYPHONET: An advanced social network extraction system from the Web , 2007, J. Web Semant..

[8]  Stanley Wasserman,et al.  Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications , 1994, Structural analysis in the social sciences.

[9]  Mitsuru Ishizuka,et al.  Increasing scalability of researcher network extraction from the web , 2005 .

[10]  Katy Börner,et al.  Mapping knowledge domains , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[11]  Henk F. Moed,et al.  Mapping of Science by Combined Co-Citation and Word Analysis. I. Structural Aspects , 1991 .

[12]  Ismael Rafols,et al.  Diversity and network coherence as indicators of interdisciplinarity: case studies in bionanoscience , 2009, Scientometrics.

[13]  Pierre Lévy,et al.  Collective Intelligence: Mankind's Emerging World in Cyberspace , 1997 .

[14]  Hiroki Sayama,et al.  Reconstructing History of Social Network Evolution Using Web Search Engines , 2010, BIONETICS.

[15]  Bart De Moor,et al.  A hybrid mapping of information science , 2008, Scientometrics.

[16]  Peter H. Reingen,et al.  Structural Analysis of Co-Author Relationships and Author Productivity in Selected Outlets for Consumer Behavior Research , 1999 .

[17]  Albert,et al.  Emergence of scaling in random networks , 1999, Science.

[18]  Mitsuru Ishizuka,et al.  Keyword Extraction from the Web for Personal Metadata Annotation , 2004, SemAnnot@ISWC.

[19]  Alan L. Porter,et al.  Measuring researcher interdisciplinarity , 2007, Scientometrics.

[20]  M. Newman,et al.  The structure of scientific collaboration networks. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[21]  Chrysanthos Dellarocas,et al.  Harnessing Crowds: Mapping the Genome of Collective Intelligence , 2009 .

[22]  Hawoong Jeong,et al.  Googling Social Interactions: Web Search Engine Based Social Network Construction , 2007, PloS one.

[23]  Bart Selman,et al.  The Hidden Web , 1997, AI Mag..

[24]  Robert L. Goldstone,et al.  The simultaneous evolution of author and paper networks , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[25]  Kevin W. Boyack,et al.  Using global mapping to create more accurate document-level maps of research fields , 2011, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[26]  Aric Hagberg,et al.  Exploring Network Structure, Dynamics, and Function using NetworkX , 2008, Proceedings of the Python in Science Conference.

[27]  Kevin W. Boyack,et al.  Approaches to understanding and measuring interdisciplinary scientific research (IDR): A review of the literature , 2011, J. Informetrics.

[28]  M. Newman Coauthorship networks and patterns of scientific collaboration , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[29]  Henk F. Moed,et al.  Mapping of science by combined co-citation and word analysis, I. Structural aspects , 1991, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[30]  Shelley D. Dionne,et al.  Retrospective Relatedness Reconstruction , 2012 .

[31]  Noah E. Friedkin,et al.  University Social Structure and Social Networks Among Scientists , 1978, American Journal of Sociology.