On the Use of Feed-Forward Neural Networks to Discriminate between Models in Financial and Insurance Risk Frameworks

The problem of assessing if a sample is coming from one of two probability distributions is most likely one of the oldest problems in the field of testing statistical hypotheses and a number of papers has been produced over the years without finding a most powerful test for this goal. In financial and insurance risk modeling, this problem is often addressed to identify the best extreme values model in a battery of alternatives or to design the heaviness of the tail of the underlying distribution. Taking advantage of the well known performance in classificatory problems of neural networks, the use of feedforward neural networks for discrimination between two distributions is herein proposed and the power of a neural goodness-of-fit test is estimated for small, moderate and large sample sizes in a wide range of symmetric and skewed alternatives. The empirical power of the procedure described is compared to the power of eight classic and well known normality tests for a sample to come from a normal distribution against each of twelve close-to normal alternatives. The neural test resulted to be the most powerful in the whole battery and its behavior was consistent with the expected statistical properties.

[1]  David R. Cox,et al.  Further Results on Tests of Separate Families of Hypotheses , 1962 .

[2]  Charles E. Antle,et al.  Likelihood Ratio Test for DiscriminaGon Between Two Models with Unknown Location and Scale Parameters , 1973 .

[3]  R. F. Kappenman,et al.  On A method for selecting a distributional model , 1982 .

[4]  R. F. Kappenman,et al.  A simple method for choosing between the lognormal and weibull models , 1988 .

[5]  Ralph B. D'Agostino,et al.  Goodness-of-Fit-Techniques , 2020 .

[6]  A. V. D. Vaart,et al.  Asymptotic Statistics: Frontmatter , 1998 .

[7]  Richard Lippmann,et al.  Neural Network Classifiers Estimate Bayesian a posteriori Probabilities , 1991, Neural Computation.

[8]  E. Lehmann Testing Statistical Hypotheses , 1960 .

[9]  F. Longin,et al.  The choice of the distribution of asset returns: How extreme value theory can help? , 2005 .

[10]  D. Cox Tests of Separate Families of Hypotheses , 1961 .

[11]  G. S. Watson,et al.  Goodness-of-fit tests on a circle. II , 1961 .

[12]  W. Hoeffding Asymptotically Optimal Tests for Multinomial Distributions , 1965 .

[13]  Reza Pakyari,et al.  Discriminating between generalized exponential, geometric extreme exponential and Weibull distributions , 2010 .

[14]  S. Shapiro,et al.  An Analysis of Variance Test for Normality (Complete Samples) , 1965 .

[15]  S. Finch,et al.  Power of tests of normality for detecting scale contaminated normal samples , 1983 .

[16]  Nello Cristianini,et al.  An Introduction to Support Vector Machines and Other Kernel-based Learning Methods , 2000 .

[17]  J Bain Lee,et al.  Probability of correct selection of weibull versus gamma based on livelihood ratio , 1980 .

[18]  J. Filliben The Probability Plot Correlation Coefficient Test for Normality , 1975 .

[19]  C. R. Heathcote,et al.  Preemptive priority queueing , 1961 .

[20]  H. Chernoff A Measure of Asymptotic Efficiency for Tests of a Hypothesis Based on the sum of Observations , 1952 .

[21]  Y. Lepage,et al.  Empirical behavior of some tests for normality , 1992 .

[22]  F. Pesarin An Asymptotically Distribution-Free Goodness-of-Fit Test for Families of Statistical Distributions Depending on Two Parameters , 1981 .

[23]  Christopher M. Bishop,et al.  Neural networks for pattern recognition , 1995 .

[24]  Chris C. Heyde,et al.  On the Problem of Discriminating between the Tails of Distributions , 2006 .

[25]  R. D'Agostino An omnibus test of normality for moderate and large size samples , 1971 .

[26]  Charles E. Antle,et al.  Discrimination Between the Log-Normal and the Weibull Distributions , 1973 .

[27]  Kurt Hornik,et al.  Approximation capabilities of multilayer feedforward networks , 1991, Neural Networks.

[28]  D. Darling,et al.  A Test of Goodness of Fit , 1954 .

[29]  Kenneth Levenberg A METHOD FOR THE SOLUTION OF CERTAIN NON – LINEAR PROBLEMS IN LEAST SQUARES , 1944 .

[30]  C. J. Adcock,et al.  Asset pricing and portfolio selection based on the multivariate extended skew-Student-t distribution , 2010, Ann. Oper. Res..

[31]  Kurt Hornik,et al.  Multilayer feedforward networks are universal approximators , 1989, Neural Networks.

[32]  R. Huisman,et al.  Optimal Portfolio Selection in a Value-at-Risk Framework , 2001 .

[33]  Michael B. Gordy A Comparative Anatomy of Credit Risk Models , 1998 .

[34]  M. Stephens EDF Statistics for Goodness of Fit and Some Comparisons , 1974 .

[35]  Debasis Kundu,et al.  Discriminating Among the Log-Normal, Weibull, and Generalized Exponential Distributions , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Reliability.

[36]  H. White Maximum Likelihood Estimation of Misspecified Models , 1982 .

[37]  Te Sun Han,et al.  The strong converse theorem for hypothesis testing , 1989, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[38]  H. White,et al.  Regularity conditions for cox's test of non-nested hypotheses , 1982 .

[39]  Guoqiang Peter Zhang,et al.  Neural networks for classification: a survey , 2000, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part C.

[40]  S. Shapiro,et al.  A Comparative Study of Various Tests for Normality , 1968 .

[41]  D. Marquardt An Algorithm for Least-Squares Estimation of Nonlinear Parameters , 1963 .

[42]  H. L. Le Roy,et al.  Proceedings of the Fifth Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability; Vol. IV , 1969 .

[43]  A. V. D. Vaart,et al.  Asymptotic Statistics: U -Statistics , 1998 .