Internet uses and gratifications: A survey in the Indian context

Uses and gratifications (U&G) theory, aids in the assessment of peoples' motivations for media usage, access and to understand their attitude towards a particular medium. In this paper this theory has been applied to derive the Internet gratification structure of Internet users in the Indian context. This study proceeds in four stages. First, six gratifications for Internet use namely self development, wide exposure, user friendly, relaxation, career opportunities, and global exchange were identified using the exploratory factor analysis. Then the factors were subjected to confirmatory factor analysis. Next with the use of t-tests the study identified the gratifications on which males and females differ significantly. Finally, with the use of discriminant analysis it has been shown that the light and heavy users of Internet differ on some of the gratification factors obtained in the study.

[1]  John Eighmey,et al.  Adding Value in the Information Age: Uses and Gratifications of Sites on the World Wide Web , 1998 .

[2]  Wynne W. Chin.  Issues and Opinion on Structural Equation Modeling by , 2009 .

[3]  A. Rubin,et al.  Predictors of Internet Use , 2000 .

[4]  P. Korgaonkar.  A Multivariate Analysis of Web Usage , 1999 .

[5]  Richard J. Fox,et al.  On the Internal Organization of Consumers' Cognitive Schemata , 1989 .

[6]  J. Hair.  Multivariate data analysis , 1972 .

[7]  Thomas F. Stafford,et al.  Determining Uses and Gratifications for the Internet , 2004, Decis. Sci..

[8]  John Eighmey.  Profiling user responses to commercial web sites , 1997 .

[9]  Naresh K. Malhotra,et al.  Marketing Research: An Applied Orientation , 1993 .

[10]  Salim Qureshi,et al.  Profiling Computer Predispositions , 1995 .

[11]  James Lull,et al.  How families select television programs: A mass‐observational study , 1982 .

[12]  Malcolm R. Parks.  Making Friends in Cyberspace , 1996, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[13]  Magid Igbaria,et al.  An Examination of Gender Differences in the Determinants of Computer Anxiety and Attitudes Toward Microcomputers Among Managers , 1990, Int. J. Man Mach. Stud..

[14]  C. Fornell,et al.  Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. , 1981 .

[15]  Werner J. Severin,et al.  Communication Theories: Origins, Methods and Uses in the Mass Media , 1991 .

[16]  S. Mulaik,et al.  EVALUATION OF GOODNESS-OF-FIT INDICES FOR STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELS , 1989 .

[17]  Thompson S. H. Teo,et al.  Gender differences in internet usage and task preferences , 2000, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[18]  Hanjun Ko.  Internet Uses and Gratifications: Understanding Motivations for Using the Internet , 2000 .

[19]  Robert D. Smith,et al.  Computer anxiety in management: myth or reality? , 1986, CACM.

[20]  D. Altman,et al.  Multiple significance tests: the Bonferroni method , 1995, BMJ.

[21]  R. Kelly Rainer,et al.  The Influence of Individual Differences on Skill in End-User Computing , 1992, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[22]  R. LaRose,et al.  Understanding Internet Usage , 2001 .

[23]  C. Lin.  Online-Service Adoption Likelihood , 1999 .

[24]  Barbara M. Byrne,et al.  Structural equation modeling with EQS : basic concepts, applications, and programming , 2000 .

[25]  Carolyn A. Lin.  Modeling the Gratification‐Seeking Process of Television Viewing , 1993 .

[26]  Robert LaRose,et al.  Internet Gratifications and Internet Addiction: On the Uses and Abuses of New Media , 2004, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[27]  Fred D. Davis.  Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology , 1989, MIS Q..

[28]  Thompson S. H. Teo,et al.  Usage Patterns and Perceptions of the Internet: The Gender Gap , 1997 .

[29]  H. Ono,et al.  Gender and the Internet , 2003 .

[30]  Thomas E. Ruggiero.  Uses and Gratifications Theory in the 21st Century , 2000 .

[31]  Xueming Luo.  Uses and Gratifications Theory and E-Consumer Behaviors , 2002 .

[32]  L. Cronbach,et al.  Construct validity in psychological tests. , 1955, Psychological bulletin.

[33]  Chang-Hoan Cho,et al.  INTERNET USES AND GRATIFICATIONS: A Structural Equation Model of Interactive Advertising , 2005 .

[34]  Eric B. Weiser,et al.  Gender Differences in Internet Use Patterns and Internet Application Preferences: A Two-Sample Comparison , 2000, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[35]  Douglas A. Ferguson,et al.  The World Wide Web as a Functional Alternative to Television , 2000 .

[36]  Faith D. Gilroy,et al.  Computer Anxiety: Sex, Race and Age , 1986, Int. J. Man Mach. Stud..

[37]  James C. Anderson,et al.  STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING IN PRACTICE: A REVIEW AND RECOMMENDED TWO-STEP APPROACH , 1988 .

[38]  R. Bagozzi,et al.  On the evaluation of structural equation models , 1988 .

[39]  Magid Igbaria,et al.  Computer anxiety and attitudes towards microcomputer use , 1990 .

[40]  Sheizaf Rafaeli,et al.  The Electronic Bulletin Board: A Computer-Driven Mass Medium , 1984 .