Dentoskeletal effects and facial profile changes during activator therapy.
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] H. Pancherz,et al. Effective condylar growth and chin position changes in activator treatment: a cephalometric roentgenographic study. , 2009, The Angle orthodontist.
[2] D. Bearn,et al. Functional regulator treatment of Class II division 1 malocclusions. , 2001, European journal of orthodontics.
[3] J. McNamara,et al. Treatment effects produced by the twin-block appliance and the FR-2 appliance of Fränkel compared with an untreated Class II sample. , 1999, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.
[4] P. Cook,et al. Predicting functional appliance treatment outcome in Class II malocclusions--a review. , 1997, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.
[5] B. Ingervall,et al. Initial effects of treatment of Class II malocclusion with the Herren activator, activator-headgear combination, and Jasper Jumper. , 1997, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.
[6] M. Harkness,et al. Maxillary and cranial base changes during treatment with functional appliances. , 1996, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.
[7] L. Johnston,et al. Permanence of skeletal changes after function regulator (FR-2) treatment of patients with retrusive Class II malocclusions. , 1996, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.
[8] C. Nelson,et al. Mandibular changes during functional appliance treatment. , 1993, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.
[9] K. Derringer. A Cephalometric Study to Compare the Effects of Cervical Traction and Andresen Therapy in the Treatment of Class II Division 1 Malocclusion , 1990, British journal of orthodontics.
[10] S. Jakobsson,et al. The influence of activator treatment on skeletal growth in Angle Class II: 1 cases. A roentgenocephalometric study. , 1990, European journal of orthodontics.
[11] K. Derringer. A Cephalometric Study to Compare the Effects of Cervical Traction and Andresen Therapy in the Treatment of Class II Division 1 Malocclusion: Part 1—Skeletal Changes , 1990, British journal of orthodontics.
[12] R. N. Moore,et al. Vertical and horizontal components of functional appliance therapy. , 1989, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.
[13] Chen Kc,et al. Effects of activator treatment on Class II, division 1 malocclusion. , 1989 .
[14] S E Bishara,et al. Functional appliances: a review. , 1989, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.
[15] C. Charron. Recherche d'éléments pronostiques quant à l'efficacité de l'activateur en occlusion de Classe II d'Angle. , 1989 .
[16] H. F. Chang,et al. Effects of activator treatment on Class II, division 1 malocclusion. , 1989, Journal of clinical orthodontics : JCO.
[17] D. Woodside,et al. The influence of functional appliance therapy on glenoid fossa remodeling. , 1987, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.
[18] F. P. van der Linden,et al. Concepts on functional appliances' mode of action. , 1987, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.
[19] H. Pancherz,et al. Treatment with an orthopedic appliance system in relation to treatment intensity and growth periods. A study of initial effects. , 1987, American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics.
[20] W. S. Hunter,et al. Cephalometric changes associated with treatment using the activator, the Fränkel appliance, and the fixed appliance. , 1985, American journal of orthodontics.
[21] J. McNamara,et al. The functional regulator (FR-3) of Fränkel. , 1985, American journal of orthodontics.
[22] K. Vargervik,et al. Response to activator treatment in Class II malocclusions. , 1985, American journal of orthodontics.
[23] F. Bookstein,et al. Skeletal and dental changes following functional regulator therapy on class II patients. , 1985, American journal of orthodontics.
[24] H Pancherz,et al. A cephalometric analysis of skeletal and dental changes contributing to Class II correction in activator treatment. , 1984, American journal of orthodontics.
[25] N. Bass. Orthopedic coordination of dentofacial development in skeletal Class II malocclusion in conjunction with edgewise therapy. Part II. , 1983, American journal of orthodontics.
[26] N. Bass. Orthopedic coordination of dentofacial development in skeletal Class II malocclusion in conjunction with edgewise therapy. Part I. , 1983, American journal of orthodontics.
[27] G P Schmuth,et al. Milestones in the development and practical application of functional appliances. , 1983, American journal of orthodontics.
[28] N. Robertson. An examination of treatment changes in children treated with the function regulator of Fränkel. , 1983, American journal of orthodontics.
[29] T. Creekmore,et al. Fränkel appliance therapy: orthopedic or orthodontic? , 1983, American journal of orthodontics.
[30] T. Graber. Skeletal and soft tissue response to activator treatment , 1982 .
[31] H. Luder. Skeletal profile changes related to two patterns of activator effects. , 1982, American journal of orthodontics.
[32] B. Melsen,et al. Condylar development and mandibular rotation and displacement during activator treatment. An implant study. , 1982, American journal of orthodontics.
[33] J A McNamara,et al. Components of class II malocclusion in children 8-10 years of age. , 2009, The Angle orthodontist.
[34] A. H. Owen. Morphologic changes in the sagittal dimension using the Fränkel appliance. , 1981, American journal of orthodontics.
[35] L. Wieslander,et al. The effect of activator treatment on class II malocclusions. , 1979, American journal of orthodontics.
[36] J. Ahlgren,et al. Late Results of Activator-Treatment: A cephalometric study , 1976, British journal of orthodontics.
[37] A. Demisch. Effects of activator therapy on the craniofacial skeleton in class II, division 1 malocclusion. , 1972, Transactions. European Orthodontic Society.
[38] K. Vargervik,et al. Morphogenetic response to activator treatment. , 1971, American journal of orthodontics.
[39] C. Meach. A cephalometric comparison of bony profile changes in Class II, division 1 patients treated with extraoral force and functional jaw orthopedics. , 1966, American journal of orthodontics.
[40] Arne Bjöek. The principle of the Andresen method of orthodontic treatment, a discussion based on cephalometric x-ray analysis of treated cases , 1951 .
[41] A. Bjork. The principle of the Andresen method of orthodontic treatment a discussion based on cephalometric x-ray analysis of treated cases. , 1951, American journal of orthodontics.