Dentoskeletal effects and facial profile changes during activator therapy.

The aim of this retrospective study was to investigate cephalometrically the skeletal, dental, and soft tissue modifications induced by activator treatment in patients with Class II malocclusions caused by mandibular retrognathism. The subjects, all in the mixed dentition, were selected from a single centre and were divided into two groups: 40 patients treated with an incisor double capping activator (20 girls, 20 boys with a mean age of 10 years) and a control group of 30 subjects (15 girls, 15 boys with a mean age of 10 years). The dentoskeletal and aesthetic changes that occurred were compared on lateral cephalograms taken before treatment (T0) and after 18-24 months, when the activator was removed (T1). In the control group the radiographs were obtained before (T0) and after (T1) 21 months (standard deviation +/- 3 months). Activator treatment in these growing patients resulted in a correction of the Class II relationship (ANB -2.14 degrees), a restriction of maxillary growth (SNA -0.5 degrees), an advancement of the mandibular structures (SNB +1.64 degrees, FH--NPg +3.39 degrees; OLp-B +5.17 mm, OLp-Pg +5.14 mm, OLp-Go +2.44 mm), a correction of the overjet (-5.03 mm), an improvement in overbite (-1.17 mm) and uprighting of the maxillary incisors (1--FH -5.64 degrees). The activator appliance was effective in treating growing patients with mandibular deficiency: activator therapy corrected Class II malocclusions by a combination of skeletal and dental changes and improved the soft tissue facial profile.

[1]  H. Pancherz,et al.  Effective condylar growth and chin position changes in activator treatment: a cephalometric roentgenographic study. , 2009, The Angle orthodontist.

[2]  D. Bearn,et al.  Functional regulator treatment of Class II division 1 malocclusions. , 2001, European journal of orthodontics.

[3]  J. McNamara,et al.  Treatment effects produced by the twin-block appliance and the FR-2 appliance of Fränkel compared with an untreated Class II sample. , 1999, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[4]  P. Cook,et al.  Predicting functional appliance treatment outcome in Class II malocclusions--a review. , 1997, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[5]  B. Ingervall,et al.  Initial effects of treatment of Class II malocclusion with the Herren activator, activator-headgear combination, and Jasper Jumper. , 1997, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[6]  M. Harkness,et al.  Maxillary and cranial base changes during treatment with functional appliances. , 1996, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[7]  L. Johnston,et al.  Permanence of skeletal changes after function regulator (FR-2) treatment of patients with retrusive Class II malocclusions. , 1996, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[8]  C. Nelson,et al.  Mandibular changes during functional appliance treatment. , 1993, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[9]  K. Derringer A Cephalometric Study to Compare the Effects of Cervical Traction and Andresen Therapy in the Treatment of Class II Division 1 Malocclusion , 1990, British journal of orthodontics.

[10]  S. Jakobsson,et al.  The influence of activator treatment on skeletal growth in Angle Class II: 1 cases. A roentgenocephalometric study. , 1990, European journal of orthodontics.

[11]  K. Derringer A Cephalometric Study to Compare the Effects of Cervical Traction and Andresen Therapy in the Treatment of Class II Division 1 Malocclusion: Part 1—Skeletal Changes , 1990, British journal of orthodontics.

[12]  R. N. Moore,et al.  Vertical and horizontal components of functional appliance therapy. , 1989, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[13]  Chen Kc,et al.  Effects of activator treatment on Class II, division 1 malocclusion. , 1989 .

[14]  S E Bishara,et al.  Functional appliances: a review. , 1989, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[15]  C. Charron Recherche d'éléments pronostiques quant à l'efficacité de l'activateur en occlusion de Classe II d'Angle. , 1989 .

[16]  H. F. Chang,et al.  Effects of activator treatment on Class II, division 1 malocclusion. , 1989, Journal of clinical orthodontics : JCO.

[17]  D. Woodside,et al.  The influence of functional appliance therapy on glenoid fossa remodeling. , 1987, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[18]  F. P. van der Linden,et al.  Concepts on functional appliances' mode of action. , 1987, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[19]  H. Pancherz,et al.  Treatment with an orthopedic appliance system in relation to treatment intensity and growth periods. A study of initial effects. , 1987, American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics.

[20]  W. S. Hunter,et al.  Cephalometric changes associated with treatment using the activator, the Fränkel appliance, and the fixed appliance. , 1985, American journal of orthodontics.

[21]  J. McNamara,et al.  The functional regulator (FR-3) of Fränkel. , 1985, American journal of orthodontics.

[22]  K. Vargervik,et al.  Response to activator treatment in Class II malocclusions. , 1985, American journal of orthodontics.

[23]  F. Bookstein,et al.  Skeletal and dental changes following functional regulator therapy on class II patients. , 1985, American journal of orthodontics.

[24]  H Pancherz,et al.  A cephalometric analysis of skeletal and dental changes contributing to Class II correction in activator treatment. , 1984, American journal of orthodontics.

[25]  N. Bass Orthopedic coordination of dentofacial development in skeletal Class II malocclusion in conjunction with edgewise therapy. Part II. , 1983, American journal of orthodontics.

[26]  N. Bass Orthopedic coordination of dentofacial development in skeletal Class II malocclusion in conjunction with edgewise therapy. Part I. , 1983, American journal of orthodontics.

[27]  G P Schmuth,et al.  Milestones in the development and practical application of functional appliances. , 1983, American journal of orthodontics.

[28]  N. Robertson An examination of treatment changes in children treated with the function regulator of Fränkel. , 1983, American journal of orthodontics.

[29]  T. Creekmore,et al.  Fränkel appliance therapy: orthopedic or orthodontic? , 1983, American journal of orthodontics.

[30]  T. Graber Skeletal and soft tissue response to activator treatment , 1982 .

[31]  H. Luder Skeletal profile changes related to two patterns of activator effects. , 1982, American journal of orthodontics.

[32]  B. Melsen,et al.  Condylar development and mandibular rotation and displacement during activator treatment. An implant study. , 1982, American journal of orthodontics.

[33]  J A McNamara,et al.  Components of class II malocclusion in children 8-10 years of age. , 2009, The Angle orthodontist.

[34]  A. H. Owen Morphologic changes in the sagittal dimension using the Fränkel appliance. , 1981, American journal of orthodontics.

[35]  L. Wieslander,et al.  The effect of activator treatment on class II malocclusions. , 1979, American journal of orthodontics.

[36]  J. Ahlgren,et al.  Late Results of Activator-Treatment: A cephalometric study , 1976, British journal of orthodontics.

[37]  A. Demisch Effects of activator therapy on the craniofacial skeleton in class II, division 1 malocclusion. , 1972, Transactions. European Orthodontic Society.

[38]  K. Vargervik,et al.  Morphogenetic response to activator treatment. , 1971, American journal of orthodontics.

[39]  C. Meach A cephalometric comparison of bony profile changes in Class II, division 1 patients treated with extraoral force and functional jaw orthopedics. , 1966, American journal of orthodontics.

[40]  Arne Bjöek The principle of the Andresen method of orthodontic treatment, a discussion based on cephalometric x-ray analysis of treated cases , 1951 .

[41]  A. Bjork The principle of the Andresen method of orthodontic treatment a discussion based on cephalometric x-ray analysis of treated cases. , 1951, American journal of orthodontics.