FKF1 Conveys Timing Information for CONSTANS Stabilization in Photoperiodic Flowering

Spring Into Flower In spring, plants respond to increasing day length and shifts in the spectrum of solar irradiance by releasing the flowering induction pathway, which includes expression of the FLOWERING LOCUS T (FT) protein. Song et al. (p. 1045) have now identified a trio of controls brought to bear on FT gene expression by the FKF1 (FLAVIN-BINDING, KELCH REPEAT, F-BOX 1) protein. FKF1 removes a repressor and also stabilizes the activating CONSTANS (CO) protein in the afternoons through a binding interaction enhanced by blue light—an increasing component of solar irradiation during spring. Then FKF1 itself helps to activate transcription of the CO gene. Thus, by removing the repressor and shoring up the activator, FKF1 sets flowering on its way. A plant protein sensitive to blue light links longer afternoons to more flowering. Plants use day-length information to coordinate flowering time with the appropriate season to maximize reproduction. In Arabidopsis, the long day–specific expression of CONSTANS (CO) protein is crucial for flowering induction. Although light signaling regulates CO protein stability, the mechanism by which CO is stabilized in the long-day afternoon has remained elusive. Here, we demonstrate that FLAVIN-BINDING, KELCH REPEAT, F-BOX 1 (FKF1) protein stabilizes CO protein in the afternoon in long days. FKF1 interacts with CO through its LOV domain, and blue light enhances this interaction. In addition, FKF1 simultaneously removes CYCLING DOF FACTOR 1 (CDF1), which represses CO and FLOWERING LOCUS T (FT) transcription. Together with CO transcriptional regulation, FKF1 protein controls robust FT mRNA induction through multiple feedforward mechanisms that accurately control flowering timing.

[1]  R. Tóth,et al.  Plant development goes like clockwork. , 2010, Trends in genetics : TIG.

[2]  S. Kay,et al.  FKF1 F-Box Protein Mediates Cyclic Degradation of a Repressor of CONSTANS in Arabidopsis , 2005, Science.

[3]  Dmitri A. Nusinow,et al.  FKF1 and GIGANTEA Complex Formation Is Required for Day-Length Measurement in Arabidopsis , 2007, Science.

[4]  Mariko Sawa,et al.  GIGANTEA directly activates Flowering Locus T in Arabidopsis thaliana , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[5]  R. Rosenfeld Nature , 2009, Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery.

[6]  Young Hun Song,et al.  FLOWERING BHLH transcriptional activators control expression of the photoperiodic flowering regulator CONSTANS in Arabidopsis , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[7]  T. Kiyosue,et al.  Identification of LOV KELCH PROTEIN2 (LKP2)-interacting factors that can recruit LKP2 to nuclear bodies. , 2005, Plant & cell physiology.

[8]  宁北芳,et al.  疟原虫var基因转换速率变化导致抗原变异[英]/Paul H, Robert P, Christodoulou Z, et al//Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A , 2005 .

[9]  D. E. Somers,et al.  Formation of an SCF(ZTL) complex is required for proper regulation of circadian timing. , 2004, The Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology.

[10]  We thank S , 2010 .

[11]  B. Liu,et al.  Arabidopsis cryptochrome 1 interacts with SPA1 to suppress COP1 activity in response to blue light. , 2011, Genes & development.

[12]  M. Fromm,et al.  Improved tandem affinity purification tag and methods for isolation of protein heterocomplexes from plants. , 2004, The Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology.

[13]  Hitoshi Onouchi,et al.  CONSTANS mediates between the circadian clock and the control of flowering in Arabidopsis , 2001, Nature.

[14]  Y. Sang,et al.  COP1-Mediated Ubiquitination of CONSTANS Is Implicated in Cryptochrome Regulation of Flowering in Arabidopsis[W] , 2008, The Plant Cell Online.

[15]  Andrew J. Millar,et al.  Ubiquitin ligase switch in plant photomorphogenesis: A hypothesis , 2011, Journal of theoretical biology.

[16]  Jessika Adrian,et al.  Arabidopsis SPA proteins regulate photoperiodic flowering and interact with the floral inducer CONSTANS to regulate its stability , 2006, Development.

[17]  Peter Hajdukiewicz,et al.  The small, versatilepPZP family ofAgrobacterium binary vectors for plant transformation , 1994, Plant Molecular Biology.

[18]  Xuanming Liu,et al.  Blue Light-Dependent Interaction of CRY2 with SPA1 Regulates COP1 activity and Floral Initiation in Arabidopsis , 2011, Current Biology.

[19]  U. Alon Network motifs: theory and experimental approaches , 2007, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[20]  C. Pittendrigh,et al.  Circadian rhythms and the circadian organization of living systems. , 1960, Cold Spring Harbor symposia on quantitative biology.

[21]  Andrew J. Millar,et al.  Prediction of Photoperiodic Regulators from Quantitative Gene Circuit Models , 2009, Cell.

[22]  Dirk Inzé,et al.  GATEWAY vectors for Agrobacterium-mediated plant transformation. , 2002, Trends in plant science.

[23]  T. Mockler,et al.  Regulation of photoperiodic flowering by Arabidopsis photoreceptors , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[24]  S. Hendricks,et al.  Photoperiodism in Plants. , 1960, Science.

[25]  Young Hun Song,et al.  CONSTANS and ASYMMETRIC LEAVES 1 complex is involved in the induction of FLOWERING LOCUS T in photoperiodic flowering in Arabidopsis. , 2012, The Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology.

[26]  S. Kay,et al.  Molecular basis of seasonal time measurement in Arabidopsis , 2002, Nature.

[27]  A. Probst,et al.  Chromatin techniques for plant cells. , 2004, The Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology.

[28]  D. Ravenscroft,et al.  Photoreceptor Regulation of CONSTANS Protein in Photoperiodic Flowering , 2004, Science.

[29]  T. Mizuno,et al.  Genetic linkages of the circadian clock-associated genes, TOC1, CCA1 and LHY, in the photoperiodic control of flowering time in Arabidopsis thaliana. , 2007, Plant & cell physiology.

[30]  T. Mizuno,et al.  Arabidopsis clock-associated pseudo-response regulators PRR9, PRR7 and PRR5 coordinately and positively regulate flowering time through the canonical CONSTANS-dependent photoperiodic pathway. , 2007, Plant & cell physiology.

[31]  Young Hun Song,et al.  F-Box Proteins FKF1 and LKP2 Act in Concert with ZEITLUPE to Control Arabidopsis Clock Progression[C][W] , 2010, Plant Cell.

[32]  Haiyang Wang,et al.  Direct Interaction of Arabidopsis Cryptochromes with COP1 in Light Control Development , 2001, Science.

[33]  D. Weigel,et al.  Move on up, it's time for change--mobile signals controlling photoperiod-dependent flowering. , 2007, Genes & development.

[34]  G. Coupland,et al.  Arabidopsis DOF transcription factors act redundantly to reduce CONSTANS expression and are essential for a photoperiodic flowering response. , 2009, Developmental cell.

[35]  R. Amasino Seasonal and developmental timing of flowering. , 2010, The Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology.

[36]  J. Carrington,et al.  Bipartite signal sequence mediates nuclear translocation of the plant potyviral NIa protein. , 1991, The Plant cell.

[37]  X. Deng,et al.  Arabidopsis COP1 shapes the temporal pattern of CO accumulation conferring a photoperiodic flowering response , 2008, The EMBO journal.

[38]  S. Kay,et al.  FKF1 is essential for photoperiodic-specific light signalling in Arabidopsis , 2003, Nature.

[39]  Maksat Ashyraliyev,et al.  Systems biology: parameter estimation for biochemical models , 2009, The FEBS journal.

[40]  Z. Schwarz‐Sommer,et al.  Distinct roles of CONSTANS target genes in reproductive development of Arabidopsis. , 2000, Science.

[41]  O. Ratcliffe,et al.  The flowering time regulator CONSTANS is recruited to the FLOWERING LOCUS T promoter via a unique cis-element. , 2010, The New phytologist.