Statistical analysis of Salmonella test data and comparison to results of animal cancer tests.

A quantitative framework for the analysis of results of the Salmonella (Ames) test is presented, and the relationship between mutagenesis and carcinogenesis is examined. Color graphics are used for the Salmonella data to describe variability, and trends across multiple chemicals and test conditions. Positivity in the Salmonella test, using statistical criteria to classify results, is compared to positivity in carcinogenesis bioassays for 48 chemicals tested in NCI/NTP-sponsored programs. Sensitivity of the Salmonella test across 5 tester strains was 91% (21/23), while specificity was only 36% (9/25). Results were most concordant for TA100 Aroclor-induced rat S9: sensitivity was 87%, specificity 64%. The correlation of mutagenic potency and carcinogenic potency was 0.41 (p less than 0.001) for 80 chemicals, using results from both the general published literature and the NCI/NTP-sponsored programs. After removal of 3 extreme values, the correlation was 0.24 (p = 0.04).

[1]  Malcolm C. Pike,et al.  The TD50: a proposed general convention for the numerical description of the carcinogenic potency of chemicals in chronic-exposure animal experiments. , 1984 .

[2]  H S Rosenkranz,et al.  Short-term test results for NTP noncarcinogens: an alternate, more predictive battery. , 1986, Environmental mutagenesis.

[3]  J. Kaldor,et al.  A comparison of alternative measures of mutagenic potency in the Salmonella (Ames) test. , 1983, Mutation research.

[4]  W. W. Nichols,et al.  Short-term tests for carcinogens and mutagens. , 1979, Mutation research.

[5]  D. Clive A linear relationship between tumorigenic potency in vivo and mutagenic potency at the heterozygous thymidine kinase (TK+/−) locus of L5178Y mouse lymphoma cells coupled with mammalian metabolism , 1978 .

[6]  W. Lijinsky,et al.  Mutagenicity of N-nitrosopiperidines with Salmonella typhimurium/microsomal activation system ☆ , 1977 .

[7]  J. Kaldor,et al.  An empirical approach to the statistical analysis of mutagenesis data from the Salmonella test. , 1982, Mutation research.

[8]  H S Rosenkranz,et al.  Reproducibility of microbial mutagenicity assays: II. Testing of carcinogens and noncarcinogens in Salmonella typhimurium and Escherichia coli. , 1985, Environmental mutagenesis.

[9]  M. Coombs,et al.  Mutagenic and carcinogenic metabolites of the carcinogen 15,16-dihydro-11-methylcyclopenta[a]phenanthren-17-one. , 1980, Cancer research.

[10]  S. Stasiewicz,et al.  Chemicals showing no evidence of carcinogenicity in long-term, two-species rodent studies: the need for short-term test data. , 1984, Environmental mutagenesis.

[11]  L. Gold,et al.  Ranking possible carcinogenic hazards. , 1987, Science.

[12]  Richard Wilson,et al.  Use of Acute Toxicity to Estimate Carcinogenic Risk , 1984 .

[13]  M. Pike,et al.  Toxicity and carcinogenic potency. , 1985, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[14]  I. Purchase,et al.  Significance of the genotoxic activities observed in vitro for 35 of 70 NTP noncarcinogens. , 1985, Environmental mutagenesis.

[15]  E. Zeiger,et al.  The mutagenicity of N-nitrosopiperidines for Salmonella typhimurium. , 1978, Mutation research.

[16]  M. Pike,et al.  Some tautologous aspects of the comparison of carcinogenic potency in rats and mice. , 1985, Fundamental and applied toxicology : official journal of the Society of Toxicology.

[17]  B. Ames,et al.  Detection of carcinogens as mutagens in the Salmonella/microsome test: assay of 300 chemicals: discussion. , 1976, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[18]  H S Rosenkranz,et al.  Reproducibility of microbial mutagenicity assays: I. Tests with Salmonella typhimurium and Escherichia coli using a standardized protocol. , 1984, Environmental mutagenesis.

[19]  M. Mendelsohn Can Chemical Carcinogenicity Be Predicted by Short‐Term Tests? a , 1988, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[20]  David G. Hoel,et al.  Some Tautologous Aspects of the Comparison of Carcinogenic Potency in Rats and Mice , 1985 .

[21]  P. Russo,et al.  Quantitative predictivity of the transformation in vitro assay compared with the Ames test. , 1983, Journal of toxicology and environmental health.

[22]  R. Kapp,et al.  An evaluation of the mouse sperm morphology test and other sperm tests in nonhuman mammals. A report of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Gene-Tox Program. , 1983, Mutation research.

[23]  M. Pike,et al.  The TD50: a proposed general convention for the numerical description of the carcinogenic potency of chemicals in chronic-exposure animal experiments. , 1984, Environmental health perspectives.

[24]  B. Ames,et al.  Validation of the Salmonella test: a reply to Rinkus and Legator. , 1981, Cancer Research.

[25]  J. Epler,et al.  Mutagenicity of cyclic nitrosamines in Salmonella typhimurium: effect of ring size. , 1979, Mutation research.

[26]  E Crouch,et al.  Tautology or not tautology? , 1987, Journal of toxicology and environmental health.

[27]  A. Kinsella,et al.  Long Term and Short Term Screening Assays for Carcinogens: A Critical Appraisal , 1981, British Journal of Cancer.

[28]  J. Guttenplan,et al.  A correlation between mutagenic and carcinogenic potencies in a diverse group of N-nitrosamines: determination of mutagenic activities of weakly mutagenic N-nitrosamines. , 1981, Carcinogenesis.

[29]  H S Rosenkranz,et al.  The carcinogenicity prediction and battery selection (CPBS) method: a Bayesian approach. , 1985, Mutation research.

[30]  J Ashby,et al.  Comparisons between carcinogenic potency and mutagenic potency to Salmonella in a series of derivatives of 4-dimethylaminoazobenzene (DAB). , 1982, Mutation research.

[31]  H. Bartsch,et al.  Bacterial and mammalian mutagenicity tests: validation and comparative studies on 180 chemicals. , 1980, IARC scientific publications.

[32]  Rory A. Fisher,et al.  Statistical Methods for Research Workers. , 1956 .

[33]  W. Lutz,et al.  In vivo covalent binding of organic chemicals to DNA as a quantitative indicator in the process of chemical carcinogenesis. , 1979, Mutation research.

[34]  J. T. Macgregor,et al.  The induction of micronuclei as a measure of genotoxicity. A report of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Gene-Tox Program. , 1983, Mutation research.

[35]  M. Pike,et al.  A carcinogenic potency database of the standardized results of animal bioassays , 1984, Environmental health perspectives.

[36]  M. Pike,et al.  Calculation of carcinogenic potency from long-term animal carcinogenesis experiments. , 1984, Biometrics.

[37]  E. Zeiger,et al.  The mutagenicity of heterocyclic N-nitrosamines for Salmonella typhimurium. , 1976, Mutation research.

[38]  B. Ames,et al.  Third chronological supplement to the carcinogenic potency database: standardized results of animal bioassays published through December 1986 and by the National Toxicology Program through June 1987. , 1987, Environmental health perspectives.

[39]  S. Latt,et al.  Sister-chromatid exchanges: a report of the GENE-TOX program. , 1981, Mutation research.

[40]  W. Fritz WHO‐IARC Monographs on the evaluation of carcinogenic risk of chemicals to humans. Supplement 2: Long‐Term and Short‐Term Screening Assays for carcinogens: A critical appraisal. 426 Seiten. International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon 1980. Preis: 40,‐sfrs.; 25,‐US$ , 1982 .

[41]  A. Giuliani,et al.  Cluster analysis of short-term tests: a new methodological approach. , 1985, Mutation research.

[42]  S Parodi,et al.  Quantitative correlations amongst alkaline DNA fragmentation, DNA covalent binding, mutagenicity in the Ames test and carcinogenicity, for 21 compounds. , 1982, Mutation research.

[43]  E Farber,et al.  Cellular biochemistry of the stepwise development of cancer with chemicals: G. H. A. Clowes memorial lecture. , 1984, Cancer research.

[44]  H S Rosenkranz,et al.  Assembly and preliminary analysis of a genotoxicity data base for predicting carcinogens. , 1985, Mutation research.

[45]  D. Jerina,et al.  Mutagenicity and tumor-initiating activity of cyclopenta(c,d)pyrene and structurally related compounds. , 1980, Cancer research.

[46]  B. Ames,et al.  Second chronological supplement to the Carcinogenic Potency Database: standardized results of animal bioassays published through December 1984 and by the National Toxicology Program through May 1986. , 1987, Environmental health perspectives.

[47]  B. Ames,et al.  Detection of carcinogens as mutagens in the Salmonella/microsome test: assay of 300 chemicals. , 1975, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[48]  H S Rosenkranz,et al.  Application of the carcinogenicity prediction and battery selection (CPBS) method to the Gene-Tox data base. , 1985, Mutation research.

[49]  B. Ames,et al.  Chronological supplement to the Carcinogenic Potency Database: standardized results of animal bioassays published through December 1982. , 1986, Environmental health perspectives.

[50]  G. P. Ford,et al.  The influence of molecular size and partition coefficients on the predictability of tumor initiation in mouse skin from mutagenicity in Salmonella typhimurium. , 1980, Carcinogenesis.

[51]  J Kaldor,et al.  An evaluation of Salmonella (Ames) test data in the published literature: application of statistical procedures and analysis of mutagenic potency. , 1984, Mutation research.

[52]  M. Kendall Statistical Methods for Research Workers , 1937, Nature.